Tag Archives: leftwingers

Dessa judar har uppfunnit allting, Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo, mySpace, eBay . . .

Jag råkade ramla in på denna webbsida, 2 år gammal, och började en intressant läsning. Den ger en massa intressant information – grejen är att den är gjord enbart för att få folk att hata judar för att de har varit så framgångsrika!  Jag misstänker att de totalt misslyckas med sin uppgift om man inte redan är genuin antisemit.

En kopia av den gamla webbsidan följer eftersom den är rätt gammal och riskerar att falla bort.

En del visste jag – att judar låg bakom mycket av dagens mest populära program på Internet. Men läs med nöje, de har tagit fram mycket information! Allting kan man se från två håll – jag har varit på muslimska hatställen för att ladda ner Mein Kampf för att få en aning om vad den handlar om, inte för att jag kommit särskilt långt.

Man borde kanske påpeka lite oftare vad som är judiska uppfinningar. När rikemansbarn sitter i Kairo och Facebookar och försöker få världen att tro att de på något sätt representerar allmänheten i Egypten, där hälften inte kan läsa – kan man tala om att det är en judisk uppfinning. När Ahmadenijad vräker kärnvapen över nejden kan man påpeka att de flesta viktiga upptäckter inom atom- och kärnfysiken gjorts av judar. När den muslimska världen chattar mellan terrorister kan man försiktigt fråga varför de vill använda en uppfinning som fyra killar gjorde i Tel Aviv. Pratar de i mobiltelefon, använder de laptops – omöjligt utan judiska uppfinningar.

Svenska palestinagrupper har ju lagt ut utmärkta förteckningar  på israeliska varor man bör köpa – även om avsikten var tvärtom. Jag förstår inte varför de inte i stället lagt ut listor på palestinska varor som är köpvärda, men finns det inga så är det ju problem.

Det är direkt fascinerande att se deras förtvivlade försök att få folk att se att något positivt, driftiga människor, egentligen är något negativt och värt att hata, om man inte redan gör det av mera eteriska skäl. 

 Man har i årtusenden funderat på vad antisemitism är. Där har ju aldrig funnits någon som helst logik i det, så i stället har folk försökt uppfinna anledningar till deras ologiska hat. Det har funnits i tusentals år, se t.ex........

Wikipedian: History of Antisemitism.

Lista över händelser.

 


(“Freedom Research”, June, 2009)

 In the following document we will give an insight into the Jewish penetration of the Internet and also show the level of cooperation between leading Jewish Internet entrepreneurs and the racist Jewish Apartheid state of Israel.

The Jews – contrary to the “liberal” views they officially say they profess – in their suppressive acts practically demonstrate that they always seek to dominate the information flow, they don’t tolerate any dissent. It is just as when Israel says “Shalom” while Israel’s military at the very same time pounds its Arab neighbour states with bombs and missiles.

The Arabs have learnt the hard way the faleshood of these Jewish statements, it is now time for the rest of the non-Jewish world to get this right, and to see that the freedom of information on the Net is seriously threatened. 

This document will not cover the entire field. Also, as it is timebound to an an anlysis that is from a 2009 perspective – things will change. Companies will change names, new actors will appear. But still this piece of work is unique and will give a guide into the mechanisms behind the Net, mechanisms that will continue to act even in the future. And as many of these Jewish entrepreneurs are rather young and the Internet seems to be here to stay, we will hear from them for a long time onwards.

WARNING: Please note that the contents of some of the sites with revealing Jewish material we have linked to below, may be altered by the Jews in the future. Perhaps even information contrary to this document and Radio Islam will replace the original material we had linked to. This has happened before and for our part just illustrates the level of Jewish dishonesty.

Sections

 

Some Jewish “profiles” behind information on the Internet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Google´s Jew Sergey Brin
Wikipedia´s Jew Jim Wales

 

 

  


 

 

Google

(which in 2006 acquired Youtube)

 

  

 

Founders Brin and Page are Jewish

The Jewish site SomethingJewish.co.uk writes in a review by Marcus J. Freed of the book ”Richistan”, 05/09/2007 on “the Jewish boys from Google”:

The global economy is vastly different to 40 years ago and today’s new billionaires include the Jewish boys from Google, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, along with thousands of other ‘instapreneurs’.

Larry Page – who shares the title of Google President even has an Israeli family connection.

B´nai B´rith Magazine, paper of one of the mightiest Jewish organizations, writes in their article “The Searchmasters”, spring 2006, on“…Larry Page, whose mother Gloria is Jewish”. The Magazine continues:

Larry’s maternal grandfather, however, followed a much different path. He was an early settler in Israel, making aliyah in the spartan desert town of Arad.

  

 

Sergei Brin and Larry Page -“the Jewish boys from Google”

 

The Jewish entourage in Google

The Jew Craig Silverstein was the first employee hired by Google’s founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

The Jewish woman Susan Wojcicki was the one who gave Google office space to start the business. Susan Wojcicki has since become Vice President of Product Management at Google.

This while here likewise Jewish younger sister Anne Wojcicki, a biotechnology specialist, in May 2007 during ”a traditional Jewish wedding” ceremony (according to Israeli paper Ha´aretz, May 29, 2008) married the Google President Sergey Brin. Keeping everything neatly within the tribe. 

SomethingJewish.co.uk writes 24/05/2007:

Jewgle wedding

 

By: Leslie Bunder

The world’s wealthiest Jewish bachelor is no more. Sergey Brin, co-founder of search giant Google and worth over $16bn got hitched to his long-time love Anne Wojcicki earlier this month in the Bahamas, but so secret was the wedding, that it has only recently been confirmed.

According to a report in the San Jose Mercury News, the wedding took place under a chuppah with both Brin and Wojcicki confirming their commitment to the Jewish faith, though no rabbi is said to have officiated at the ceremony.

Wojcicki, is the sister of Susan Wojcicki who gave Google office space to start the business.

In 2001, Brin’s mother Eugenia commented she hoped he would find a Jewish bride. “I hope he would keep that in mind,” she said.

Wojcicki, who has a background in biotechnology, has been active in Jewish projects and currently sits on the board of Reboot, a venture that engages Jews to explore their culture.

Recently, Wojcicki launched a biotech company 23andMe which has seen Google itself invest several million dollars into it.

Justin Rosenstein was a top engineer at Google serving three years as Google´s Product Manager for Page Creator. Rosenstein was one of the first employees that Facebook´s Jewish boss Mark Zuckerberg poached from Google as Facebook began its rise in 2007. In 2008 Rosenstein left Facebook with Facebook´s likewise Jewish co-founder, Dustin Moskovitz, to form a new company. 

 

 

 

Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz (left) and Justin Rosenstein

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sheryl Sandberg

Another Jewish profile who has been important in the shaping of Google is Sheryl Sandberg.

Sheryl Sandberg was Google Vice President of Global Online Sales & Operations, a position from where she built and managed the online sales channels for advertising and publishing and operations for consumer products globally. Sandberg was behind Google´s AdWords, and sat in the board of Google´s philantropic arm Google.org.

Before Google, Sandberg worked for the Jew Lawrence Summers, first when he was Chief Economist of the World Bank, then as his Chief of Staff when Summers was Treasury Secretrary in the Clinton Administration.

The Jewish Chronicle (December 4, 2008) ran an article on the book “Jewish Wisdom for Business Success” - a book by Rabbi Levi Brackman and Jewish journalist Sam Jaffe - where they argue that the Torah and ancient rabbinic texts are not simply guides for holy living, they can also provide helpful career advice. The Jewish Chronicle writes:

Their book combines tips on good business practice gleaned from the Bible, Midrash and Kabbalah with examples of success stories such as Andy Klein, who quit corporate law to start a brewery and ended up with an investment bank, or Sheryl Sandberg, who rose to become vice president for global sales for Google. And while there are role models to emulate, there also ones to avoid: Pharaoh the gas ruach (man of coarse spirit) or Korah, the ba’al ga’avah, the arrogant egotist. 

 

Sheryl Sandberg

 

 

 

 

As Vice President of Google´s Global Sales Sandberg was behind the AdWords project which links paid advertisements to search results, a gadget that allowed Google to turn their search engine into “extremely profitable business”, as Rabbi Levi Brackman and journalist Sam Jaffe write in their book “Jewish Wisdom for Business Success”, p. 2. They have the case of Sheryl Sandberg in the first chapter in their book as an example of Jewish business sucess. In the same p. 2 of their book:

Early in 2008, she left Google to become the second-in-command of Facebook, the emerging social-networking company.

Sheryl Sandberg – Jewish “second-in-command of Facebook” – is presently Chief Operating Officer at Facebook. As COO, Sandberg is responsible for helping Facebook scale its operations and expand its presence globally. Sandberg manages sales, marketing, business development, human resources, public policy, privacy and communications and reports directly to Facebook’s Jewish CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Sheryl Sandberg is well connected to the Jewish community and the “philantropy” business, a favourite Jewish pastime where they can take a small part of their enormous wealth gained from the “goyim” and put it in small projects completely after their taste, to show how humane, generous and an openminded they are. Sandberg was thus with Daniel Sokatch, CEO of the Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco, on a joint venture “addressing global poverty and social justice issues through philanthropy”, December 10, 2008.

She also sponsors Jewish activities at for instance the Joshman Family Jewish Community Center, a center that not so surprisingly also has an “Israel connection”, as their website says. The Joshman Center writes on this “Israel connection”:

Our mission is to strengthen relationships between American Jews and the Israeli émigré community and to build a deeper connection to Israel.

See: http://www.paloaltojcc.org/index.php?src=gendocs&ref=Rambam’s%20Ladder%20Award%20Dinner%20and%20Auction%202009&category=Special%20Events&submenu=Special_Events

Sandberg was included in Fortune’s 50 Most Powerful Women of 2007.

She is married to former Yahoo! music head David Goldberg with whom she has two children.

More Google Jews – Elliot Schrage and Ethan Beard

 

Elliot Schrage

 

 

 

 

The Jew Elliot Schrage was since 2005 Google´s Vice President of Communications and Public Affairs, the man who ran Google´s PR. He had this important position until May 2008 when he left for Facebook to work under the same role.

At Google, he broadened the company’s messaging from a focus on only product PR to include all aspects of corporate, financial, policy, philanthropic and internal communications. Before Google Shrage served as a Senior Fellow at theCouncil on Foreign Relations, the Zionist infested “public policy think tank”.

Schrage together with the Jewish US Holocaust Museum launched the Darfur tool to Google Earth (see article U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and Google Join in Online Darfur Mapping Initiativehttp://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/darfur_mapping.html):

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum today joined with Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) to unveil an unprecedented online mapping initiative aimed at furthering awareness and action in the Darfur region of Sudan. Crisis in Darfur, enables more than 200 million Google Earth™ mapping service users worldwide to visualize and better understand the genocide currently unfolding in Darfur. The Museum has assembled content—photographs, data and eyewitness testimony—from a number of sources that are brought together for the first time in Google Earth. This information will appear as a Global Awareness layer in Google Earth starting today.

Google Earth’s Elliot Schrage, Vice President, Global Communications and Public Affairs, joined Museum Director Sara J. Bloomfield and Darfurian Daowd Salih at the launch.

Crisis in Darfur is the first project of the Museum’s Genocide Prevention Mapping Initiative that will over time include information on potential genocides allowing citizens, governments and institutions to access information on atrocities in their nascent stages and respond.

“Educating today’s generation about the atrocities of the past and present can be enhanced by technologies such as Google Earth,” says Bloomfield. “When it comes to responding to genocide, the world’s record is terrible. We hope this important initiative with Google will make it that much harder for the world to ignore those who need us the most.”

“At Google, we believe technology can be a catalyst for education and action,” said Elliot Schrage, Google Vice President, Global Communications and Public Affairs. “Crisis in Darfur will enable Google Earth users to visualize and learn about the destruction in Darfur as never before and join the Museum’s efforts in responding to this continuing international catastrophe.”

Of course spreading the knowledge of Israel´s genocidal destruction of Palestinian infrastructure in Gaza in the 2009 assault is not part of this education.

 

Ethan Beard

 

 

 

 

Another actor is Ethan Beard who was Google´s Director of Social Media. He has since left for Facebook to become Director of Facebook’s Business Development and then Facebook’s Director of Platform marketing. There are indications that he is Jewish.

Manber – Google´s Israeli Vice President of Engineering

Google’s Vice President of Engineering, Udi Manber, is Israeli and a graduate from the Israel´s Technion Institute in Haifa.

He has a long record of top jobs in Internet related positions.

Manber became the chief scientist at Yahoo! in 1998.

In 2002, he joined Amazon.com, where he became “chief algorithms officer” and a Vice President. He was later appointed CEO of the Amazon subsidiary company A9.com, where he led the company’s A9 search engine work. (Please see an article on Amazon´s support for Israel.) 

In 2006, Manber was hired by Google as one of Google´s Vice Presidents of Engineering. In December 2007, he announced Knol, Google’s new project to create a knowledge repository.

Mandber as a senior Google operative, interacts with the Judeo-Zionist community.

Here is an advertisment which discloses how Google´s Manber will sit with a Rabbi and discuss Talmud and the Web (http://www.oakland.com/google-s-talmud-the-web-jewish-culture-and-the-power-of-associative-thinking-e394931):

Thu Sep 18, 2008

Contemporary Jewish Museum presents

Google’s Talmud: The Web, Jewish Culture, and the Power of Associative Thinking

Location

The Contemporary Jewish Museum

736 Mission Street

San Francisco, CA 94103

 

district: Downtown/Financial District

Location Date and Time

Thu Sep 18, 2008 (7:00 PM – 8:30 PM) 

Description

One of the hallmarks of Jewish culture and scholarship is an emphasis on commentary and “associative thinking,” a method essential to the creation of the Talmud and thousands of years of Biblical commentary. Udi Manber, Google’s Vice President for Engineering and best-selling technology critic Howard Rheingold will join Rabbi Lawrence Kushner in a panel discussion exploring the connections between art, technology, and Jewish culture, as seen through the new social, intellectual, and spiritual implications of the idea of “search.” This will be followed by a discussion with Dan Schifrin, the Museum’s director of public programs and writer in residence.  

Advertisement for the event was also made in the Jewish Weeklyhttp://www.jweekly.com/article/full/35726/calendar/ 

 

 

 

Udi Manber, Google´s Israeli Vice President of Engineering

 

 

 

 

 

 

Google’s Jewish guru of giving

In the article “Google’s guru of giving” (http://www.financialexpress.com/news/googles-guru-of-giving/265113/0), January 24, 2008, TheFinancial Express details Larry Brilliant. Dr Brilliant led the Internet giant’s philanthropic arm Google.org, where he ruled over a and 40-strong team:

As well as adopting the informal company motto, “Don’t be evil”, the internet search firm’s co-founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, decided to commit Google to engage in serious philanthropy. Innovative as ever, they created a new sort of philanthropic entity, a division of the company that could pursue its mission through both for-profit investing and making charitable grants. This, they hoped, would one day “eclipse Google itself in overall world impact by ambitiously applying innovation and significant resources to the largest of the world’s problems.”

It would be funded with 1% of the firm’s equity, annual profits and employees’ time.

In February 2006, after a lengthy search, Dr Brilliant was appointed to run Google.org. Media reports focused on the old hippy’s colourful past, not least his spell as a doctor with the Grateful Dead, a legendary 1960s rock band. What attracted his new employers was his unique record of success both in running Silicon Valley tech firms and in implementing large-scale solutions to big social problems.

[...]

Though he has taken nearly two years to produce a strategy for Google.org, Dr Brilliant has not been taking things easy. He may have added a taste for Hindu meditation to his Detroit Jewish roots (he once shared a guru with Apple’s boss, Steve Jobs), but he is a driven man, travelling widely and seeking advice from hundreds of people, pushing himself harder than friends say is wise for a sexagenarian. When he arrived at Google.org he found extraordinarily high expectations, a blank sheet of paper to fill with a strategy, and “microscopic attention” from outside on what it was doing.

During his time as Google´s philantropic boss Brilliant combined his work with his dedication for Jews and Judaism. For instance Brilliant, as Executive Director of Google.org, appeared as a speaker at the Jewish Community Federation in San Fransisco´s Business Leadership Council Breakfast meeting. February 28, 2007. According to the organization´s homepage (http://www.sfjcf.org/aboutjcf/press/2007/brilliant.asp):

Larry Brilliant, Executive Director of Google.org, will share his vision for “Healing a Broken World” with attendees at the second annual Business Leadership Council Breakfast on Wednesday, February 28, 2007.

 

[...]

Dr. Larry Brilliant is the Executive Director of Google.org, the umbrella organization which includes the Google Foundation as well as partnerships with and contributions to for-profit and nonprofit entities.

[...]

Sponsored by AT&T and Levisohn Venture Partners, this special BLC event is open to all donors who contribute $1,000 or more to the 2007 San Francisco-based Jewish Community Federation’s Annual Campaign. Donors under the age of 40 who contribute $500 are also welcome.

The Jewish Community Federation is the central organization for fundraising, planning, outreach and leadership development for Jewish communities in San Francisco, the Peninsula, and Marin and Sonoma counties. In fiscal year 2006, the Federation’s annual campaign allocated $18.3 million to some 60 agencies providing social services, educational and cultural programs in the Bay Area, in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere in the world. In fiscal year 2006, the Federation’s Endowment Fund, with assets exceeding $1.8 billion, provided more than $203 million for a variety of grants, seed projects and emergency needs. For more information, call 415.777.0411 or visit www.sfjcf.org.

So here we can see how the Google boss fraternises with an organization that is interrelated to the Zionist state.

In April 2009 Larry Brilliant, after 3 years at Google, said he was parting ways with the Internet giant, leaving Google.org to join a new organisation set up by former eBay President and Jew, Jeff Skoll. But Dr Brilliant also said he would remain as an advisor to Google.

 

Google´s Israel connections

Here follows a most revealing article on how Google´s Sergey Brin, Facebook´s Mark Zuckerberg and Yahoo´s President Susan Decker, are invited by the Israeli leadership to Israel, during Israel´s 60th anniversary celebrations:

Facebook, Google founders to attend Jerusalem conference in May

By Guy Grimland, Ha´aretz Correspondent

Ha´aretz 01/04/2008

Co-founder of internet giant Google, Sergey Brin, will join Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and Yahoo president Susan Decker at a presidential panel on technology to be held at the Jerusalem International Convention Center May 13-15.

The convention, which was formed at the initiative of President Shimon Peres, will also be attended by a number of Israeli political, religious and financial leaders, as well as academics and cultural figures.

The panel will discuss issues facing technology in today’s age and the future, in particular in regard to how it will affect Israel and the Jewish world.

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair will also take part in the conference, as will French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former prime minister of the Czech Republic Vaclev Havel, Nobel Prize Laureate Eli Wiesel, and Georgia President Michael Saakashvili

The Israel News Agency also writes (http://www.israelnewsagency.com/israel60thbirthdaypresidentsconferenceshimonperesanniversaryjerusalemolmertfacingtomorrow48050708.html):

In attendance, in addition to many national presidents and heads of state will be dignitaries from the worlds of business and academia. Among them are Sergey Brin, founder of Google and Susan Decker of Yahoo. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon Adelson will be serving as the honorary chairpersons for the Israel 60th Birthday Presidential Conference which has enthusiastically attracted the attention of Jewish leaders and others worldwide.

And B’ nai B’ rith Magazine (http://bnaibrith.org/magazines/2008FallBBM/future-concerns-mariaschin.cfm) are also happy with the representation:

I was particularly impressed with the large numbers of young people in attendance, representing Israeli universities and aliyah organizations like MASA. At the conclusion of the panel discussion moderated by Israeli entrepreneur Yossi Vardi and featuring, among others, Brin, the co-founder of Google; Susan Decker of Yahoo; and Rupert Murdoch, several dozen young adults crowded on stage to meet the speakers—and more than one business card was exchanged.

 

 

 

Google´s Sergey Brin at Western Wall, Jerusalem

 

 

 

 

 

 

We write more on the Zionists attending this conference in our section on Yahoo!.

Google´s business cooperation with Israel

Ha´aretz online edition 15/05/2008, writes:

Google co-founder lauds Israeli innovation in tech, environment

By Lior Kodner, Haaretz Correspondent and Haaretz Service

Google co-founder Sergey Brin on Thursday lauded Israeli innovations in technology and environmental efforts, saying Israel “takes our climate challenges very seriously.”

Brin, visiting as a delegate to President Shimon Peres’ Presidential Conference, told Haaretz that these challenges have “great geopolitcal ramifications on this country, in addition to environmental ones.”

He noted that Israel’s leading efforts in the field of sustainable energy, saying: “Obviously in Israel they need to innovate with water and things like that. I was really intrigued to see drip irrigation. I just realized that came out of Israel.”

Brin gave particular attention to Israel’s work in environmentally friendly transportation.

A prototype of the world’s first fully electric car was demonstrated for the first time on Sunday in Tel Aviv, by Israeli entrepreneur Shai Agassi.

Developers hope the car will revolutionize transportation in the country and serve as a pilot for the rest of the world. If all goes as planned, Israel will be the first country to have electric cars on its highways in large numbers in the next few years.

Brin also spoke about new projects ongoing at Google, including the “huge range of efforts” being made on mobile technology and the patience needed in the field.

“I think it takes a while to devlop the technology, to devlop,

to educate advertisers about it,” he said. “We have to bootstrap everything. our search based targeted ads took a number of yearsand people are expecting overnight that you work a miracle. It is a combination of technology, advertising networks, abd user expectations. All those things have to come together and that takes time,” he said.

During his visit, Brin toured Jewish sites, including the Western Wall in the Old City of Jerusalem.

Google co-founder Sergey Brin, attending the World Economic Forum in Davos, announced the establishment of an R&D center in Israel. Ha´aretz 30/01/2006 writes:

Google founder plans R&D center in Israel

By Guy Rolnik

DAVOS, Switzerland – Google “is in the process of establishing an R&D center in Israel,” Sergey Brin, a founder of the Internet search titan, told Haaretz during the World Economic Forum here. Brin and co-founder Larry Page were among the more visible participants at the economic conference. Both have a solid connection with Israeli entrepreneurs in the Internet field.

A Google executive told Haaretz that the company had recently recruited a large number of academics, engineers, mathematicians, statisticians and economists for additional development of the company’s search engine algorithm and its smart ad systems on the Net. There is still a shortage of quality personnel for developing analytic tools and predicting the massive volume of information accumulated on the search engine.

[...]

Last summer, Google decided to establish a local marketing and sales branch in Israel to bolster its advertising revenues in the Israel market. Google hired Meir Brand to head its Israel office, choosing a former Microsoft executive just as it had done in China.

[...]

 

Ha´aretz interview with Sergey Brin in Israel, May 29, 2008:

[...]

 

This is Brin’s third visit to Israel. The first time was with his parents, when he was still a teenager, and the second was in September 2003, when Google was still a relatively small, privately owned company. Last week, however, Brin arrived here as the head of one of the largest and most influential companies in the world.

How has Israel changed since your previous visits?

“It’s pretty impressive just to see how the tech industry has continued to grow. The development, kind of just looking at the city of Tel Aviv. I mean, there are a bunch of buildings. Maybe I’m crazy, but I feel like there are lots of buildings that weren’t here when I was here last. And I’ve just seen some of the companies and their state of development, the levels developed here – it’s just incredible.”

[...]

Did your family ever consider immigrating to Israel?

“Boy, I need to ask them that. In fact, my great-grandmother lived in the U.S. for a period of time, so we did have some ties to the U.S. I think my dad actually had a colleague who had moved to the U.S., who had given him greater certainty [with respect to] the job market. And those were the big factors. But I can ask. My parents are here with me – I mean, not in the office, but in Israel.”

In hindsight, considering what you see now in the U.S. and Israel, if your parents had come here, do you think we would have Google today?

[Laughs] “Look, I’ve been very lucky in my life, and I’m sure there’ve been lots of random circumstances that have contributed to that, so I probably would not be the first to change it. But looking at the kinds of innovation and development that I see here now, I certainly think it’s possible to enjoy great success coming to Israel.”

Google´s cooperation with Jewish censors 

Below are some articles illustrating how Google assists Jewish Internet censorship. The articles show that Google follows dictats from ADL and the Zionist Organization of America, that Google “robots” censor pro-Palestinian bloggers, and that sites like Radio Islam are censored.

 

 

 

Here we will give attention to one extra article to show how the Zionist organization ADL cooperates with Google. In 2007 a conference was held in Israel with ADL, the International Network Against Cyberhate, and Google´s Israel Director Meir BrandHa´aretz, 12/11/2007, writes:

Organizers of the conference representing the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish group that counters anti-Semitism, brought examples of anti-Jewish hate material freely available on the Internet, and participants called for more action to stop it.

 

[...]

He [Meir Brand] said Google removes results from its search index only when required to by law, for example, when copyright infringement is an issue. In Germany and Austria, he said, Google removes Nazi content, which is against the law there.

Recognizing the problem, however, Google has instituted a warning system for hate entries, taking viewers to a page warning that some of the search results may be offensive, and noting that opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect Google’s views.

Just as a small reminder ADL:s Director Abraham Foxman was one of many top Jewish dignitaries in Israel celebrating Israel´s 60th Anniversary back in 2008.

 

      

 

Appendix

Excerpts from the article “Sergey Brin: the Google revolutionary”, by Mark Malseed, The Jewish Chronicle, April 6, 2007 [the complete article can be read here]:

 

This intensity emerges during weekly strategy meetings, where he and Page — who share the title of Google president — command the last word on approving new products, reviewing new hires and funding long-term research.

Brin also holds sway over the unscientific but all-important realms of people, policy and politics.

Brin’s Jewish sensibility is, likewise, grounded in his family’s experience of life in the Soviet Union, and their eventual emigration to the United States. “I do somewhat feel like a minority,” he says. “Being Jewish, especially in Russia, is one aspect of that. Then, being an immigrant in the US. And then, since I was significantly ahead in maths in school, being the youngest one in a class. I never felt like a part of the majority. So I think that is part of the Jewish heritage in a way.”

As a young boy, though, he had only a vague awareness of why his family wanted to leave their native Russia. He picked up the ugly details of the antisemitism they faced bit by bit years later, he says. Nevertheless, he sensed, early on, all of the things that he wasn’t – he wasn’t Russian; he wasn’t welcome in his own country; he wasn’t going to get a fair shake in advancing through its schools. Further complicating his understanding of his Jewish identity was the fact that, under the atheist Soviet regime, there were few religious or cultural models of what being Jewish was. The negatives were all he had.

For many Soviet Jews, exit visas never came. But, in May 1979, the Brins were granted papers to leave the USSR. “We hoped it would happen,” Genia says, “but we were completely surprised by how quickly it did.” The timing was fortuitous – they were among the last Jews allowed to leave until the Gorbachev era. Sergey Brin, who turned six that summer, remembers what followed as simply unsettling” – literally so. “We were in different places from day to day,” he says. The journey was a blur. First Vienna, where the family was met by representatives of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which helped thousands of Eastern European Jews establish new lives in the West. Then, on to the suburbs of Paris, where Michael’s “unofficial” Jewish PhD adviser, Anatole Katok, had arranged a temporary research position for him.

One thing the Brins shared with thousands of other families emigrating to the West from the Soviet Union was the discovery that, suddenly, they were free to be Jews. “Russian Jews lacked the vocabulary to even articulate what they were feeling,” says Lenny Gusel, the founder of a San Francisco-based network of Russian-Jewish immigrants. “They were considered Jews back home. Here, they were considered Russians. Many longed just to assimilate as Americans.” Gusel’s group, which he calls the “79ers”, after the peak year of immigration in the 1970s, and its New York cousin, RJeneration, have attracted hundreds of 20- and 30-something immigrants who grapple with their Jewish identity. “Sergey is the absolute emblem of our group, the number one Russian-Jewish immigrant success story,” he says.

The Brins were no different from their fellow immigrants in that being Jewish was an ethnic, not a religious, experience. “We felt our Jewishness in different ways, not by keeping kosher or going to synagogue. It is genetic,” explains Sergey’s father Michael. “We were not very religious. My wife doesn’t eat on Yom Kippur; I do.” Genia interjects: “We always have a Passover dinner. We have a Seder. I have the recipe for gefilte fish from my grandmother.” Religious or not, on arriving in the suburbs of Washington, the Brins were adopted by a synagogue, Mishkan Torah of Greenbelt, Maryland, which helped them acquire furnishings for their home. “We didn’t need that much, but we saw how much the community helped other families,” Genia says. Sergey attended Hebrew school at Mishkan Torah for almost three years but hated the language instruction – and everything else, too. “He was teased there by other kids and he begged us not to send him any more,” his other remembers. “Eventually, it worked.” the Conservative congregation turned out to be too religious for the Brins and they drifted.

When a three-week trip to Israel awakened 11- year-old Sergey’s interest in all things Jewish, the family inquired at another synagogue about restarting studies to prepare for a barmitzvah. But the rabbi said it would take more than a year to catch up and Sergey abandoned the pursuit. If there was one Jewish value the Brin family upheld without reservation, Michael says, it was scholarship.

 

Sergey Brin

 

 

 

 

What came next is Google legend. In the spring of 1995, Sergey met an opinionated computer- science student from the University of Michigan named Larry Page. They argued over the course of two days, each finding the other cocky and obnoxious. They also formed an instant bond, relishing the intellectual combat. Like Sergey, Larry is the son of high-powered intellects steeped in computer science. The two young graduate students also share a Jewish background.

Larry’s maternal grandfather made aliyah, and his mother was raised Jewish. Larry, however, brought up in the mould of his father, a computer-science professor whose religion was technology, does not readily identify as a Jew. He, too, never had a barmitzvah. Larry and Sergey soon began working on ways to harness information on the web, spending so much time together that they took on a joint identity, LarryandSergey”.

Their venture quickly bore fruit. After viewing a quick demo, Sun Microsystems co-founder Andy Bechtolsheim (himself a Jewish immigrant from Germany) wrote a $100,000 cheque to “Google, Inc”.

They are without a doubt two of the most eligible bachelors on Google Earth, but both are reported to be in serious relationships – Sergey is reportedly engaged to Anne Wojcicki, a healthcare investor and the sister of Google executive Susan Wojcicki, who owned the garage where Google got started. In a 2001 interview, Genia said she hoped Sergey would find “somebody exciting who could be really interesting to him… [who] had a sense of humour that could match his”. As one might expect, she also prefers that Sergey marry a Jewish girl. “I hope that he would keep it in mind,” she confided.

The Ten Commandments it is not, but Google does operate with a moral code of sorts. “Don’t be evil” is the maxim supposed to guide behaviour at all levels of the company. When pressed for clarification, Google chief executive officer Eric Schmidt has famously said: “Evil is whatever Sergey says is evil.” One malevolent practice, in Google’s view, is tampering with or otherwise censoring the list of results produced by a Google search. An early test of the Google founders’ commitment to providing unfiltered information struck very close to home. The antisemitic website Jew Watch appeared prominently in Google results for searches on the term “Jew”, prompting Jewish groups to demand that Google remove the site from the top of its listings. Google refused. Sergey said at the time: “I certainly am very offended by the site, but the objectivity of our rankings is one of our very important principles.” As a compromise, Google displays a warning at the top of questionable pages.

Viewed against the backdrop of Sergey’s distaste for authority, the decision to cave in to China’s totalitarian leadership seems out of character. Sergey’s public comments on the matter have evolved to reflect this contradiction. While defending the decision at first, he later acknowledged that Google had “compromised” its principles. “Perhaps now the principled approach makes more sense,” he has said, but adding: “It’s not where we chose to go right now.” Does a company founded by two Jews, no matter how assimilated, necessarily retain some defining Jewish characteristics? The Google masterminds’ penchant for pushing boundaries – without asking permission – might as well be called chutzpah.

However you label it, it is an attitude that runs deeply through Google and may help explain why the company is embroiled in lawsuits over many of its new projects: the aggressive scanning of library books it does not own; display of copyrighted material; and copyright issues connected to its acquisition of YouTube, the online video site whose popularity rests in part on the availability of pirated television and movie clips. Google’s first employee and several other early hires were Jewish and, when the initial winter-holiday season rolled around, a menorah rather than a Christmas tree graced the lobby. Google’s former chef, Charlie Ayers, cooked up latkes, brisket, tzimmes and matzah-ball soup for Chanucah meals and turned the Passover Seder into a Google tradition.

To some, Google’s emphasis on academic achievement – hiring only the best and the brightest and employing hundreds of PhDs – could be considered Jewish. So, perhaps, could “Don’t be evil”. With its hint of tikkun olam, the Kabbalistic concept of “repairing the world”, it reflects the company’s commitment to aggressive philanthropy.

Nevertheless, he and his parents do support a few charities. “There are people who helped me and my family out. I do feel responsible to those organisations,” he says. One of them is Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the group that helped the Brins come to the United States. Genia serves on its board and heads its project to create a digital record of Jewish-immigrant archives. Has Sergey been a target of antisemitism since he left the Soviet Union? “I’ve experienced it,” he says. “Usually, it is fairly subtle. People arp on about all the media companies being run by Jewish executives, with the implication of a conspiracy… I think I’m fortunate that it doesn’t really affect me personally, but there are hints of it all around. That’s why I think it is worth noting.”

Several years ago, Sergey and Larry visited a school for gifted maths students near Tel Aviv. When they took to the stage, the audience roared, as if they were rock stars. Every student there, many of them, like Sergey, immigrants, from the former Soviet Union, knew of Google. Sergey began, to the crowd’s delight, with a few words in Russian, which he still speaks at home with his parents. “I have standard Russian-Jewish parents,” he then continued in English. “My dad is a maths professor. They have a certain attitude about studies. And I think I can relate that here, because I was told that your school recently got seven out of the top 10 places in a maths competition throughout all Israel.”

The students applauded their achievement and the recognition from Sergey, unaware that he was setting up a joke. “What I have to say,” he continued, “is in the words of my father: ‘What about the other three?’” The students laughed. They knew where he was coming from. That Sergey has parlayed his skills into unimaginable business success does not mean those “standard Russian-Jewish parents” are ready to let him off the academic hook.

 

       

 

 


Facebook

 

 

 

 

“He met Mark Zuckerberg in 2002 after they had joined the same fraternity which primarily concentrated on activities within the Jewish community.

‘We ate Shabbat dinner together,’ Hasit said. ‘Every year we raised money for charities in Israel. Mark was one of the members of the fraternity, like many other Jewish students at Harvard.’

Hasit, who wears a skullcap, says the 25-year-old Zuckerberg feels an affinity with Judaism. ‘He fasts on Yom Kippur,’ Hasit says of Zuckerberg. ‘Sometimes he would come to the Hillel House, a Jewish organization that ran various activities.’ “

 

- The Jew Ariel Hasit, who now has joined the Israeli Defense Forces, on his personal experience of the Jewish Facebook founder and CEO, Mark ZuckerbergHa´aretz, 10/05/2009.

 

 

 

Jewish founder and CEO

The popular social networking site Facebook, launched in February 2004, has a 100% Jewish founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.

Jews readily boast about this fact. The Jewish etnocentrist site Jew or Not Jew: Choosing the Chosen People, see logo below, have a special entry for Zuckerberg (as they have for Google´s Sergey Brin and Larry Page), where Zuckerberg gets their “Jew Score” total of 12 (4 + 4 + 4).

See: http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=369 .

 

 

The site, which should be reagarded as some case of internal Jewish humour, explains the meaning of this score:

About the Jew Score

We evaluate how Jewish a person is based on three factors. How Jewish they are internally, how Jewish they are externally and how much we want that person to be a Jew in the first place.

In practice, the I Score tends to refer to birth history with some adjustments for how we imagine they see/saw themselves. The O Scoreis for how Jewish they look and act. The K Score stands for Kvell (pride) and is subject to the whims of the creators of this website.

The Jew Score refers to our opinion only and is affected by but not definitive of one’s actual Jewishness.

The site of the World Jewish Digest, as another example, also counts Mark Zuckerberg as one of their examples of Jewish influentials in their list “10 to watch in 2008 – WJS´s shortlist to Jewish standouts” . Zuckerberg, “born into a well-to-do Jewish-American family in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y”, gets the rankning place of 3 in their list of 10 influential Jews. 

 

 

 

Mark Zuckerberg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zuckerberg´s Jewish entourage at Facebook

The New York Times, May 13, 2009, reported:

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz noted that “Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg, a Jewish former Harvard University student.”

Mr. Schnitt [a Facebook spokesman] told ABC that while some employees of the social-networking service came from families marked by the Holocaust, that was not influencing their decision:

Many of us at Facebook have direct personal connection to the Holocaust, through parents who were forced to flee Europe or relatives who could not escape. We believe in Facebook’s mission that giving people tools to make the world more open is a better way to combat ignorance or deception than censorship, though we recognize that others, including those at the company, disagree.

So here we learn from the Facebook spokesman Mr. Schnitt that ”many of us at Facebook have direct personal connection to the Holocaust”, which of course means nothing else than that they are Jewish.

So who are these Jewish actors?

To begin with, in the absolute beginning, when Zuckerberg decided to spread his new Facebook project to other schools than Harvard, he enlisted help from his Jewish friend Dustin MoskovitzMoskovitz then became the Vice President of Engineering of Facebook.

 

 

 

Dustin Moskovitz

 

 

 

 

 

 

They got their first funding from another Jew, German-born technology entrepreneur Peter Thiel, one of the founders of PayPal.

We here recommend reading an article from the The Guardian (14 Jan, 2008) on the people behind Facebook which has more information on Thiel. The Guardian concludes that:

“… the real face behind Facebook is the 40-year-old Silicon Valley venture capitalist and futurist philosopher Peter Thiel.”

 

 

 

Peter Thiel

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a typical Jewish etnocentrist Thiel prefers to deal with other Jews. His business partner with whom he who founded PayPal is the Ukrainan-born now-American Jew Max Rafael Levchin.

 

David Sacks

 

 

 

 

 

George Zachary

 

 

 

 

Other Jews Thiel is interacting with are David Sacks, PayPal’s former chief operating officer, and George Zachary“a friend of Max and Peter’s” and partner of the Jew Ed Skoll from eBay.

Below follows an excerpt from “Once You’re Lucky, Twice You’re Good: The Rebirth of Silicon Valley and the Rise of Web 2.0″, by Sarah Lacy, (see:http://www.metroactive.com/metro/06.11.08/cover-supermen-0824.html) on Thiel´s “PayPal mafia”:

The PayPal mafia even had Hollywood success. Jeff Skoll was one of the first eBay executives who became friends with the PayPal crew when eBay bought the company in 2002. He started up Participant Productions on a lark, and it has been one of the most profitable productions companies in Hollywood. Among its first four films were Syriana, Good Night, and Good Luck, North Country, and An Inconvenient Truth. Skoll’s success convinced Max and Peter to start dabbling in Hollywood, bankrolling the 2006 indie flick Thank You for Smoking, along with David Sacks, PayPal’s former chief operating officer.

While Sacks continued to play the Hollywood game, he also launched a new social networking site for families, called Geni.com. It allows people to fill out their family trees and link them to the family trees of spouses and in-laws. Anyone on the tree can add to the tree, the idea being that over time you discover people you’re related to that you didn’t know. It’s a bold idea, one of the first Web 2.0 start-ups aimed squarely at families. Peter Thiel, naturally, backed it early on. And in Geni’s first venture capital round with Charles River Ventures, it got nosebleed $100 million valuation. The CRV partner who wrote the check was George Zachary, Skoll’s early partner in Participant Productions and a friend of Max and Peter’s. By 2006, the PayPal mafia was an incestuous world where, for now, everyone seemed to be making lots of money.

Thiel makes up one fourth of the Board members of Facebook. Thus apart from providing the money, he really has a lot of influence – just as The Guardian had noted.

Thiel – “the real face behind Facebook” – is a Zionist

What The Guardian failed to tell is that Thiel also has an Israel agenda.

The Israeli-based Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies writes (http://www.adelsoninstitute.org.il/OnAgenda.aspx?id=62&from=a):

On Tuesday, May 12, 2009, The Adelson Institute hosted Richard Perle, former assistant to the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee during the Reagan administration, and Peter Thiel, Co-Founder of PayPal and President of Clarium Capital Management. The topic of discussion was: “The first 100 days of the Obama administration”.

Perle briefed the Adleson Institue’s staff and faculty and said that the outcome of Obama’s new approach towards adversaries will be tested in a few months time.

Thiel, who participated in Perle’s briefing, said that there is an incredible gap between Israel’s reality and its potential. People talk about China, India and Brazil as emerging market countries, he added, while Israel is underrated. According to Thiel, all it takes is a short visit to Israel in order to appreciate the incredible talent, intensity and drive of the Israelis.

It should here be reminded that Richard Perle that Thiel met in a briefing, is the infamous Neo-con from the Bush era who was one of the main Jewish architects behind the Iraq invasion and war in 2003.

Facebook sponsor Peter Thiel reveals his Israel agenda in a video speech he made for the Adelson Institute and which can be seen through the following link: http://www.adelsoninstitute.org.il/MediaViewer.aspx?id=57

The Adelson Institute gives the following description of Thiel´s video message:

Israel is Truly the Country of the Future, May 17, 2009

There is an incredible gap between Israel’s reality and its potential, says Peter Thiel, Co-Founder of PayPal and President of Clarium Capital Management. Thiel, a guest of the Adelson Institute for Strategic studies, participated in Richard Perle’s briefing at the Adelson Institute. People talk about China, India and Brazil as emerging market countries, says Thiel, while Israel is underrated. All it takes is a short visit in order to appreciate the incredible talent, intensity and drive of the Israelis.

In the video Peter Thiel – economic sponsor and Facebook Board member – hails the Jewish state of Israel. Here follows a transcript of some of his statements in the video:

“I believe that Israel is a truly extraordinary place.”

“… an incredible potential…”

“Just visiting here [in Israel] for a few days one is always struck by the incredible talent and intensity and drive of the people.”

“I think that if Israel is able to resolve some of these issues, that surround it over the next few years, it will probably be the best place in the world.”

“I believe the future is not in cheap labour or cheap capital or in real estate. I believe the future is in technology and in that sense perhaps Israel is truly the country of the future.”

The Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem is a 100 % Zionist institution.

We here reproduce the Mission Statement of the institute Thiel cooperates with:

The Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem is an academic and research institute founded by its chairman, Natan Sharansky, in 2007. The Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies develops, articulates and builds support for the strategic principles needed to address the challenges currently facing Israel and the West. Israel, as the only democracy in this region surrounded by totalitarian governments, is on the cutting edge of the challenges and dangers confronting Western civilization everywhere.

As part of this overall effort, the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies seeks to explore how the advancement of freedom, democracy, and human rights can be marshaled as an effective measure to secure and strengthen international stability and security. The Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies also seeks to examine international law in light of the new forms of asymmetric warfare and terror; the establishment of credible deterrence against guerilla and terror organizations and the states that sponsor them; the appropriate response to weapons of mass destruction; and the strengthening of Israel’s relations with its strategic allies.

Natan Sharansky, founder and chairman of the institute, is a racist Russian Jew and Israeli politician (former deputy Prime Minister) famous for his “tough” stance on the Palestinians. Palestinian resistance to Zionist domination is branded as “terrorism”. Sharansky writes in Jan. 15, 2009 (Bloomberg.com) on the ongoing Israeli slaughter in Gaza:

Terrorism is a cancer that can’t be cured through “proportional” treatments. It requires invasive surgery.

Here follows another article on Peter Thiel and Israel from [vc]cafe (http://www.vccafe.com/2008/01/02/peter-thiel-gambles-on-the-next-internet-hit-israels-hooja/):

Peter Thiel gambles on the next internet hit – Israel’s Hooja

Peter Thiel knows a thing or two about consumer internet. After all, he’s a PayPal cofounder, one of Facebook’s board members and its first investor ($500,000) way before its $15 billion valuation, giving him a hefty return of a billion. Thiel is known as a savvy investor with a ‘golden touch’ that tends to invest small amounts early on taking a ‘hands-off’ approach with management (learn more about his investment strategy in Thiel’s recent WSJ profile).

Apart from Facebook, Thiel invested in some of the internet’s biggest brand names early on, including: Yelp, Slide, LinkedIn and Friendster.These days, Peter Thiel is managing the hedge fund Clarium Capital, which manages $2 billion under management and he’s also a partner in the Founders Fund, that recently raised $220 million for its second fund. Now, for the first time, Thiel is betting an Israeli tech startup, to be the next winner.

Globes reports that Thiel, along with a group of private investors, raised $1.5 million for Hooja, an Israel-based startup founded in April of 2006 by Naama Moran, a former Greylock Partners associate. Hooja is still operating in stealth mode (landing page only) but its known to be developing a unique search technology that enables content providers to search for personal and social information in the deep web, including social networks. One of Hooja’s investors describes the technology as ’social search’ – basically providing higher ranking to information that a user’s friends are likely to click on.

 

Other Board members

The other Board members of Facebook apart from Thiel are Mark Zuckerberg himself, the Jewish venture capitalist Jim Breyer, and finally Marc Andreessen.

Jim Breyer also sits in the Board of Directors of Dell, Walmart and Marvel.

 

 

 

Jim Breyer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marc Andreessen is the founder of Netscape (non-Jewish?), but a man who works closely with the Jew Ben Horowitz with whom he founded Opsware. Andreessen has also invested in the Israeli Israel Seed Partners thus becoming a partner of and cooperating withJonathan Medved, one of Israel’s leading venture capitalists. So Andreesen – Jew or not – is well entangled in the Jewish-Israeli Internet establishment.

 

 

 

Ben Horowitz

 

 

 

 

 

 

In our section on Google we detailed Sheryl Sandberg, a Jewish woman who was Google´s Vice President of Global Online Sales & Operations.

As Rabbi Levi Brackman and journalist Sam Jaffe write in their book “Jewish Wisdom for Business Success”, p. 2:

Early in 2008, she left Google to become the second-in-command of Facebook, the emerging social-networking company. 

The Jewish “second-in-command of Facebook” Sheryl Sandberg is presently Chief Operating Officer. As COO, Sandberg is responsible for helping Facebook scale its operations and expand its presence globally. Sandberg in this position manages sales, marketing, business development, human resources, public policy, privacy and communications and reports directly to Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

It can here be repeated that Sandberg is married to another Jew, David Goldberg, former music head at Yahoo!.

 

Elliot Schrage

 

 

 

 

Another recruit from Google is the Jew Elliot Schrage, now Vice President of Communications, Public Policy and Platform Marketing at Facebook. In this position he is responsible for developing and coordinating key messages about products, corporate business and partnerships. He also oversees the company’s public policy strategy worldwide. At Google Schrage was Vice President of Communications and Public Affairs and in our special section on Google we documented how he worked to promote propaganda together with the Jewish “US Holocaust Memorial”.

Another Jew who has had positions of influence in Facebook was Justin Rosenstein, a top engineer who was one of the first employees Facebook poached from Google, where he was a Product Manager, as Facebook began its rise in 2007.

Both Dusty Moskovitz.and Rosenstein have since left Facebook (2008) to jointly start Internet ventures of their own.

 

Ethan Beard is head of Platform at Facebook. Earlier he was Director of Business Development. Prior to joining Facebook, he was a Director of Social Media at Google.

Facebook and Israel

The Jewish state sees the importance in Internet Jews such as Mark Zuckeberg. In 2008 the Israeli paper Ha´aretz reported: 

Facebook, Google founders to attend Jerusalem conference in May

By Guy Grimland, Ha´aretz Correspondent

Ha´aretz 01/04/2008

Co-founder of internet giant Google, Sergey Brin, will join Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and Yahoo president Susan Decker at a presidential panel on technology to be held at the Jerusalem International Convention Center May 13-15.

The convention, which was formed at the initiative of President Shimon Peres, will also be attended by a number of Israeli political, religious and financial leaders, as well as academics and cultural figures.

The panel will discuss issues facing technology in today’s age and the future, in particular in regard to how it will affect Israel and the Jewish world.

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair will also take part in the conference, as will French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former prime minister of the Czech Republic Vaclev Havel, Nobel Prize Laureate Eli Wiesel, and Georgia President Michael Saakashvili

Here we see how the young Jewish entrepreneur Zuckerberg, with fellow Internet-Jew Sergey Brin, is invited down to the Jewish state to participate in the celebrations of Israel´s 60th anniversary (which was the reason the meeting was held) and to meet with the top Zionist echelons. 

(It should here be noted that Shimon Peres is a war criminal. In 1996 he was responsible, as the leader if the Jewish state, of Israel´s massacre of over 100 Lebanese civilians in Qana.)

On March 11th, 2008, Nick O’Neill posted an interview with Mark Zuckerberg where they touched on the subject of “anti-Semitism” and Internet:

Recently Shimon Peres suggested that Israelis and Jews worldwide use Facebook to fight anti-semitism in addition to inviting Mark Zuckerberg to Israel. I asked him about his thoughts on Facebook as a tool to fight anti-semitism and if Facebook would take proactive measures to fight against it. Mark believes that Facebook need to focus on building useful communication tools and that the users can use these tools to connect and generate more worldly perspectives. As such Facebook does not need to be proactive about it. When asked about whether he will visit Israel next year, he said maybe.

 

Mark Zuckerberg (left) with fellow Jewish Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz (center) 

 

First Facebook user has joined the IDF

A quite telling detail is that the first real user of Facebook, apart from the co-founders, is a Jew, Arie Hasit (who carries the Facebook URL id 7). Hasit studied with Zuckerberg in Harvard and later on did what the Jews call Aliyah to Israel, that is he settled in occupied Palestine in accordance to the Jewish Law of Return. Hasit has since joined the Israel Defense Forces Spokespersons Unit, a propaganda/desinformation unit of the IDF.

The Israeli paper Ha´aretz ran a piece on Hasit and Facebook 10/05/2009 (underlines below added by Radio Islam):

Facebook founder’s roommate recounts creation of Internet giant

By Guy Grimland, Ha´aretz Correspondent

Five years ago, hardly anybody had heard of Facebook. Today, it seems that there is nobody in Israel or the world over who is not familiar with the social networking Web site, which recently crossed the 200 million user threshold. Facebook is estimated to be worth $15 billion after Microsoft bought 1.6 percent stock in the company for $240 million.

Arie Hasit, 26, witnessed the birth of Facebook. He shared the same apartment as Mark Zuckerberg, the site’s founder, joined the same college fraternity, and witnessed first-hand the company’s initial climb from a dormitory start-up to a dominant mega-monstrosity on the Web.

Hasit grew up in Philadelphia. Since he was young, he dreamed of immigrating to Israel, which he did two years ago. Today he is serving in the Israel Defense Forces Spokespersons Unit. He chose to enlist for a year-and-a-half rather than the six months which are required of new immigrants in his age bracket. Israel is not foreign to him.

“Every summer I was in Jewish summer camp in the U.S. From time to time I would visit Israel.”

After completing high school at age 18, he enrolled at Harvard University, where he studied the history of the Land of Israel. “I thought this would make it easier for me after I would get to Israel,” Hasit said. “My parents actually thought I should learned computers so that I would work in high-tech when I got here.”

Hasit focused his studies on the hip-hop genre in Israel, a subject which would become the topic of his thesis. He met Mark Zuckerberg in 2002 after they had joined the same fraternity which primarily concentrated on activities within the Jewish community.

We ate Shabbat dinner together,” Hasit said. “Every year we raised money for charities in Israel. Mark was one of the members of the fraternity, like many other Jewish students at Harvard.”

Hasit, who wears a skullcap, says the 25-year-old Zuckerberg feels an affinity with Judaism. “He fasts on Yom Kippur,” Hasit says of Zuckerberg. “Sometimes he would come to the Hillel House, a Jewish organization that ran various activities.”

Hasit and Zuckerberg struck up a friendship, though they were not the closest of friends. They later lived together in the college dorms.

“Mark just happened to live in the apartment where I lived in the dorms,” Hasit said. “He was in one room while I was in the other. This was a large apartment, we were seven students crammed into five bedrooms. We saw each other every day for a number of hours. When Mark moved into the dorms I was already in my third year while he was in his second year.”

Hasit says that Zuckerberg decided one day to build a Web site that would serve as a utility for students at Harvard. “He built the site for fun,” Hasit says. “We had books called Face Books, which included the names and pictures of everyone who lived in the student dorms. At first, he built a site and placed two pictures, or pictures of two males and two females. Visitors to the site had to choose who was ‘hotter’ and according to the votes there would be a ranking.”

“He only ranked people who received the most votes for being good looking, not everybody,” Hasit said. “There were about 1,000 people in all. Within four, five hours the site became so popular that at one point it became impossible to surf the Web on Harvard’s Internet server. This was on a Sunday in October 2003.”

“The next day, the head of the university denied Zuckerberg access to the Internet. People complained that Mark used their pictures without permission. He apologized and ultimately the university decided not to expel him even though there were columns in the campus newspaper that argued that what he did was completely improper.”

Zuckerberg’s stunt came at a time when students were appealing to the university to develop a Web site that would include the pictures and contact details of students in dorms. Now they feared that the Zuckerberg episode would compel the administration to shelve the idea.

“Mark heard these pleas and decided that if the university won’t do something about it, he will, and he would build a site that would be even better than what the university had planned,” Hasit said. “Before founding Facebook, he built the site Course Match which allowed students to find out who among those living in the same dorm are taking what courses, so that they could form study groups.”

Zuckerberg started developing Facebook from his modest dorm room. Every visitor who registered at the site received a serial number. The first, second, and third user who registered took up dummy pages. The fourth user was Zuckerberg himself.

The fifth user is Chris Hughes, a co-founder of Facebook who also served as the company’s spokesperson. Dustin Moskovitz, the third part of the site’s founding triumvirate, occupies the sixth user spot. Moskovitz led the technical staff at Facebook before quitting the company to found a start-up in 2008.

Hasit’s is the seventh registered user, which in practice makes him the fourth real user to log into Facebook. “Often people ask me how I became the fourth user. Sometimes I tell them.”

“Mark came to me on the day he built Facebook, and he said to me, ‘Arie, I built this site. I want you to sign up.’ And that is how I signed up to Facebook. I put a favorite quote of mine in the profile. I specified my favorite books, which courses I take at Harvard. I uploaded one picture to the profile. There was no Wall. There was no News Feed. There weren’t too many things in Facebook, which only began its lifespan on the Web.

“Initially Zuckerberg asked a small group of people to sign up to Facebook. At a certain point he told us to start inviting friends, and that is what we did on the first and second day which the site went up on the Web. We could only invite students enrolled at Harvard. In fact, if you did not have a Harvard e-mail address you could not sign into Facebook. At first, dozens of Harvard students registered. The numbers then reached the hundreds, and by the fourth day it had already reached the thousands. People were very enthusiastic about the site. It enabled them to know who took what courses and to meet new people. It conquered Harvard. In less than a week, some 4,000 students signed up for Facebook.”

Hasit recalls how Zuckerberg spent hours in front of the computer. “He studied computers and psychology,” Hasit said. “Despite the fact that he developed Facebook, he continued his studies as per usual. His grades were okay. He was even in a relationship with a girlfriend. During Facebook’s initial days, the walls in his room were filled with graphs and charts which showed how many people joined on a daily basis, who used what application, and who has the most friends.”

“After a few weeks, he decided to open up Facebook to another university. He had two friends, one at Stanford and the other at Dartmouth, whom he asked to promote the site there. He also asked for help from his ex-girlfriend who was a student at Dartmouth.”

Facebook quickly attracted a following in other leading universities. “Every user specified which university he belonged to, and that was how he kept in touch with other students at the university in which he studied, but all the networks were under one Web site.”

“The graphs and charts in his room became graphs and charts which included statistics from all the universities. At one point he received requests from students at other universities who were not in Facebook to open the site to them as well.

Summary

So we now know that the Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, “feels an affinity with Judaism” and has “raised money for charities in Israel”.

In Facebook´s early history Zuckerberg was assisted by the Jew Dustin Moskovitz and got funding from Jewish businessman Peter Thiel, the latter a man with open Zionist views and in contact with the Zionist establishment. Thiel then joined the Board of Facebook and is presently – according to The Guardian - “the real face behind Facebook”.

Other top namnes are co-Board member Jim Breyer and the Jewess Sheryl Sandberg, the “second-in-command of Facebook”.

And one of Zuckerberg´s friends from Harvard – his roommate and Facebook´s first real user – has since moved to Israel and joined the Israel Defense Forces Spokespersons Unit. This also reveals the mindset of people in Zuckerberg´s proximity.

Knowing this one is not surprised thet the arch-Zionist Shimon Peres invited Zuckerberg to Israel in 2008.

We here give links to more information on Facebook:


 

Wikipedia

 

What is Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia that anyone can edit and add information.

Wikipedia claims its articles are based on a “neutral point of view” but as it is human beings writing the articles, of course the contents quickly have been mixed up with politics. For instance organization like CIA have tried to affect the entries (see BBC:s “Wikipedia ‘shows CIA page edits’ “), and big companies try to control the information on themselves. And Israel and its army of “cyber-soldier” Jews from all over the world are now doing the same…

The Wikipedia project has ended into control of student research on the Internet.

The situation is now that the majority of subjects Googled will show Wikipedia as the top – or one of the firts top results – and thus Wikipedia will get the majority of the hits.

And as shown in our section on Google this Internet search-engine is well in the hands of Zionist Jews and also cooperates openly with Zionist organizations such as ADL and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) to control the searches and censoring information and certain sites.

This means that apart from Wikipedia other sites may be censored when Googling any given subject.

 

Larry Sanger

 

 

 

 

Wikipedia´s Jewish founders - Wales and Sanger

From all the available information it appears Wikipedia was started by two Jews, one a programmer, and the other an ‘Adult Site’ operator.

The origins are in a project called Nupedia launched in March 2000 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger.

The Jew Jimmy Wales (actually James Wales, or also known as “Jimbo”), with riches from his time as an options trader, became an Internet entrepreneur and decided to create a free, online encyclopedia. He recruited the Jew Larry Sanger, who was finishing a Ph.D. in philosophy at the Ohio State University – whom Wales knew from their joint participation in online mailing lists and Usenet discussion groups – to become the paid editor in chief. Wales’s company Bomis, an Internet search portal and a vendor of online “erotic images” (featuring the Bomis Babe Report), picked up the tab initially.

The Jewish computer programmer Ben Kovitz is the one who suggested to Larry Sanger, Nupedia’s editor-in-chief, to transfer the online encyclopedia to a wiki support. Larry and Jimmy Wales accepted and from that time, Wikipedia took over Nupedia and became a huge success.

Larry Sanger, one of the two recognized cofounders, is openly Jewish. In their rabblings of what different famous Jews are doing The Jewish Chronicle mentions Sanger in an article “Larry Sanger… creates a new Wikipedia”The Jewish Chronicle, 26 October 2006, p. 10.

Wales is presently in charge. Sanger left in 2002, and is a professor/lecturer at Ohio State. 

 

 

Jimmy Wales

 

 

Jimmy Wales History

Jimmy Wales is the de facto leader of Wikipedia and as thus wields a lot of influence. Time Magazine named him in its 2006 list of the world’s most influential people.

Short history: Wales who was born in Huntsville, Alabama, went to the exclusive Randolph prep school, and onto the University of Alabama. Wales graduated and became a Futures Trader in Chicago. Next he opened Bomis, an ‘Adult Content’ website, which was followed by Nupedia, which morphed into Wikipedia.

Wales is the darling of the Jewish crowd at Harvard, being a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, at the Harvard Law School.

What is Bomis.Com?

Basically ‘Bomis’ is an adult site, started by Wales.

The website featured user-generated webrings and that, according to The Atlantic Monthly (September 2006), “found itself positioned as the Playboy of the Internet”. For a time the company sold erotic photographs, and Wales described the site as a “guy-oriented search engine”.

 

 

 

Jimmy Wales with Bomis babes

 

 

 

 

 

a Bomis babe – financing Wikipedia

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jewish employees

Names like Jeremy Rosenfeld (a Bomis employee), Benjamin KovitzSeth Cohen, dot the landscape of technical staff. 

 

Wales´ editing interventions

It should here be noted that although Wikipedia states that it professes a “neutral point of view” the on-line dictionary has even seendirect interventions from its owner Jimmy Wales over its contents. The Herald Sun reports June 30, 2009, in the article Wikipedia edits helped free David Rohde:

THE New York Times worked with Wikipedia to keep news of the kidnapping of one of its reporters in Afghanistan off the online user-edited encyclopedia.

New York Times reporter David Rohde, who was kidnapped by the Taliban in November, escaped from his captors along with his translator this month.

A number of news organisations, including Agence France-Presse, at the request of the New York Times, agreed not to report the kidnapping out of concerns for their safety.

Keeping the news off Wikipedia was another matter, the Times said.

It said that on at least a dozen occasions, user-editors posted news of the abduction on a Wikipedia page about Mr Rohde, only to have it erased.

Several times the page was frozen, preventing further editing, it said.

“The sanitising was a team effort, led by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, along with Wikipedia administrators and people at the Times,” the newspaper said.

“We were really helped by the fact that it hadn’t appeared in a place we would regard as a reliable source,” Mr Wales told the Times.

“I would have had a really hard time with it if it had.”

The Times said that two days after the November 10 kidnapping, Michael Moss, an investigative reporter at the Times and friend of Mr Rohde, altered Mr Rohde’s Wikipedia entry to emphasise that his work could be seen as sympathetic to Muslims, like his reporting on Guantanamo and his coverage of the Srebrenica massacre of Bosnian Muslims.

It said that the next day, an unidentified user, citing an Afghan news agency report, edited the entry on Mr Rohde and mentioned the kidnapping.

Mr Moss deleted the mention, and the user promptly restored it, adding a note protesting the removal, the Times said.

It said the Times eventually reached out to Wales and Wikipedia put an indefinite block and then a temporary freeze on changes to the page.

“We had no idea who it was,” Mr Wales said of the unidentified user making the edits.

He said there was no indication the user had ill-intent.

The Times said Mr Wales himself unfroze the page after the June 19 escape by Mr Rohde and his interpreter, Tahir Ludin.

Interesting here is to see that people should be kept in the dark of the “security deterioration” and the realites of what is happening in occupied Afghanistan. Instead Wikipedia will help in sanitising the image.

 

Wikimedia Director Sue Gardner in Israel 2009

 

 

 

 

Wikipedia chief Gardner goes to Israel – gets advice

Israeli paper Ha´aretz reports 04/05/2009 on how Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation which runs Wikipedia, has participated at a meeting in Israel – a Wikipedia Academy 2009 Conference - organized by Wikimedia´s Israeli supporters and Tel Aviv University’s Netvision Institute for Internet Studies. Ha´aretz writes:

Wikipedia editors: Coverage of Israel ‘problematic’

By Cnaan Liphshiz

Wikipedia’s coverage of Israel-related issues is “problematic,” leading Israeli internet researchers claimed Sunday at the Wikipedia Academy 2009 Conference dealing with the world’s largest encyclopedia. The conference was organized by Wikimedia’s volunteer-based Israel chapter and Tel Aviv University’s Netvision Institute for Internet Studies. However, the Web site’s leading manager said it merely reflected public discourse.

In demonstrating what he defined as problems, Eli Hacohen, the Institute’s director, showed how Hamas is not defined as a terrorist organization in the first paragraph describing the organization on the English site of the reader-edited online encyclopedia, which is the world’s fourth most popular Web site.

Hacohen also documented his attempts to define Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as a Holocaust-denier. Each time he included his remarks on Wikipedia, users and editors removed the reference – despite Ahmadinejad’s frequent and public Holocaust denials.

On a related entry, Hacohen also noted that Wikipedia defines David Irving – a known Holocaust denier – as a historian, although his credentials are recognized by no one but himself. Furthermore, the Wikipedia entry on January’s Operation Cast Lead in Gaza describes it as an “intense bombardment” by Israel on a civilian population.

Dror Kamir, a leading Israeli Wikipedia promoter, showed how Lod is not listed as a city in Israel in Wikipedia’s Arabic-language version.

Also attending the conference, which discussed Wikipedia’s role in academia, was Sue Gardner, the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia. Gardner told Haaretz that she is “quite comfortable” with the mistakes on the Web site. “I know that more or less the same mistakes can be found in the New York Times,” she explained.

Before her address at the conference, she defined Wikipedia as a “just another mainstream news medium.” Wikipedia, Gardner said, “will never say anything as Wikipedia. It will only quote relatively well-respected sources, including other media. So it’s natural for Wikipedia to reflect public discourse as it fluctuates, and news is the first draft of history.”

On her first visit to Israel, Gardner explained that her attitude stemmed from her framework of reference as a journalist in her native Canada, including a stint as director of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s Web site.

The boss of Wikipedia thus travels down to the land of the chosen people to be lectured on how Wikipedia can be improved when it divulges information concerning Israel/Jews.

For a collection of images from this event beteween Wikipedia and Israel, see this link:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_Academy_Israel_2009

 

 

 

Sue Gardner in Israel 2009, Eli Hacohen to the right

 

 

Wikipedia leading editor also goes to Israel

David Shankbone, leading editor at Wikipedia, has been invited by the Israeli Government´s Foreign Ministry to help polish Israel´s image:

Photo Editing Israel’s Online Image

 

By Sharon Udasin, Staff Writer

The Jewish Week, 03/04/2009

[...]

But David Saranga, the media consul for the Consulate General of Israel in New York, plans to fight back. After launching a pro-Israel campaign through Twitter.com during the Gaza war and by bringing Maxim magazine into Israel last year, he says he is recruiting the best in the business to revamp Israel’s online image.

In just a few weeks, he will bring six American new media experts to photograph Israel, with funds from the Consulate and Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

[...]

However, Saranga says the initiative will, hopefully, knock the pictures of destruction much further down the lists, behind photos of ordinary Israeli daily life. And because he has enlisted Internet authorities like pen-named Wikipedia senior editor David Shankbone, Saranga thinks that there is a good chance they’ll stay that way.

Shankbone — whose real name is David Miller — first visited Israel in December 2007, when Saranga led a group of journalists on a tour of the country’s high-tech and environmental developments. All in all Shankbone estimates that he illustrates over 4,000 Wikipedia articles with his photography.

“The idea is to create a body of work that not only Wikipedia can use but that the general public can use,” he said.

Shankbone is not Jewish, but he said he learned extensively about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in school. While he considers himself a supporter of Israel, Shankbone doesn’t intend to make Wikipedia a Zionist Web site, and he looks at the Gaza war as a black-and-white situation — Israel had a right to respond, but its mode of attack was not without fault.

Yet for Shankbone, the purpose of his photo expedition is not to document the aftermath of the war.

“People want to talk to you about other things than just missiles,” he said.

Ideally, Shankbone said he’d like to end up at solar power plants in the Negev Desert or in a southern city like Eilat, because he spent most of his time up north during the previous trip.

“I particularly like small towns, because my feeling is that anyone can come to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem,” Shankbone said.

While on open-source sites, users can add and remove other people’s contributions as they see fit, only an administrator can permanently delete the posts from the storage database, Wikimedia Commons. In his three years working as a Wikipedia editor, however, Shankbone said that he has been careful to avoid inserting his own political positions, and readers have rarely altered his content. His collection remains the largest Creative Commons — a Web-based data-sharing platform — photograph community generated by one person, he said.

[...]

Critic Oboler, however, questions whether “bringing out people like Shankbone will help directly with the grass-roots, anti-Israel and often anti-Semitic activity that occurs online.”

“What it will do is help in the fight for hearts and minds online,” he said. “This proactive engagement is also important.”

“It certainly isn’t going to be the silver bullet,” Shankbone agreed. “It does give Wikipedia the opportunity or responsibility to present accuracy.”

And while Saranga hopes to change the world’s perception of Israel in the long term with the support of every American Israel consulate, he recognizes that, realistically, results will not be immediate.

“At the end of the day, a single activity won’t change perceptions; a single activity won’t change the criticism generated by the Gaza war,” he said. “But what is important is to create a critical mass of positive activities that will improve Israel’s image.”

The Jerusalem Post writes on the same story: 

Leading Wikipedia editor to visit Israel

By Herb Keinon

The Jerusalem Post, Dec 8, 2007

In an acknowledgement of the importance that the Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia has in shaping opinion, the Foreign Ministry is bringing one of its leading editors, David Shankbone, to Israel next week.

World According to a communiqué put out by the ministry, Shankbone has carried out dozens of interviews of US personalities for Wikipedia, including presidential candidates, religious leaders, rock stars and journalists. Shankbone will be visiting within the framework of a delegation of technology writers being brought to Israel by the Foreign Ministry and the America-Israel Friendship League.

Explaining the rationale for bringing Shankbone to Israel, David Saranga, the spokesman at the consulate in New York, said: “More than once we have faced editors connected to Israel that appear on Wikipedia in English that do not represent the reality in Israel. We decided to initiate a visit by Shankbone to describe Israeli reality as it is.”

Wikipedia, according to the Foreign Ministry, is the eighth largest web site in the world, with some 60 million visitors a day, or some 14,000 hits a second.

David Shankbone - whose real name is David Miller - has himself written on his trip in his private user page in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Shankbone/Israel):

Israel

I went to Israel to expand Wikipedia’s quality photographic representation and coverage of Israeli-related articles. My trip was reported on in their press:

  • Jerusalem Post
  • The official blog of Israel
  • Haaretz

I also wrote a series of articles about the trip for Wikinews. I interviewed their President, Shimon Peres, had lunch with the President of the Technion and discussed the philosophy of Wikipedia over dinner with Yossi Vardi. Here is the first one.

And if you have a chance—check out Solar power in Israel, which I recently wrote.

Below is a gallery of images I took on the trip.

And here is a nice picture of Shankbone-Miller with Shimon Peres:

 

 

Wikipedia´s David Shankbone (Miller) with Israeli war criminal Shimon Peres - the man behind the

Qana massacre of over 100 Lebanese civilians in 1996

 

Shankbone´s interview with Peres appeared in the Israeli paper Yedioth Aharonoth (here part of the article, reproduced from the Israeli government site http://www.isrealli.org/ – isRealli – The New Blog of the State of Israel):

WikiPeres

By Itamar Eichner

Yedioth Aharonoth, 24 December 2007, p.12 

A President with Value: Peres is the First Leader to Be Interviewed for Wikipedia’s News Site

The nation’s president proved again yesterday that despite his advanced age he has no need to be embarrassed facing politicians much younger than he. Shimon Peres is the first world leader to grant an interview to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.

The interview with Peres will be published on the Wikipedia news site, Wikinews and his statements will be integrated into various articles throughout the encyclopedia.

For over an hour, Peres sat with one of the Wikipedia senior editors, David Shankbone. Shankbone, who came to Israel with a delegation of journalists, turned to the Israeli Consul for Media and Public Affairs in New York, David Saranga, and asked to schedule an interview with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and President Peres. To Shankbone’s surprise, it was Peres who decided to take up the gauntlet and grant an interview to the popular encyclopedia. Wikipedia is the eighth most-popular website in the world in terms of daily traffic.

At the outset of the interview, Shankbone told Peres, “We checked among Internet surfers under age 30 and we found that you are the most popular and most recognizable leader in the world.”

Peres used the interview for a bitter attack on Iran. “The Iranian economy cannot support the atomic program,” he said, “and the world must decide if it is ready for nuclear weapons to fall into terrorists’ hands.”

Peres was asked his opinion of the younger generation of Israelis. “The 14- 15- and 16-year-olds need to participate in determining the world’s future,” the President explained. “If it were up to adults, they would want kids to keep dancing the hora or singing Slavic songs, but youngsters don’t listen and should not have to. Young women today also wear more risqué clothing than they did in the past and there is no problem with that since they look nicer.” Consul Saranga said last night “It was important for the Foreign Ministry that part of the interview was dedicated to subjects other than the conflict [with the Palestinians].”

  

The interview has since appeared in Wikinews – “the free news source” – as it was destined to be, and can be read at:http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Shimon_Peres_discusses_the_future_of_Israel

Shankbone-Miller to return to Israel

In his own blog 2008/07/31 Shankbone-Miller writes that he will return to Israel (http://blog.shankbone.org/2008/07/31/david-shankbone-to-go-back-to-israel-for-wikimedia/):

David Shankbone to go back to Israel for Wikimedia

By David Shankbone

Last December I traveled to Israel where I had lunch with Yitzhak Apeloig, the president of their premiere university, the Technion, and interviewed their President and Nobel Peace Prize recipient Shimon Peres (photo, right).

In the next few months I will be returning to the Holy Land for a week-long photography expedition. From the students of Haifa to the dolphins of Eilat; from the vineyards of the Galillee to the Bedouins of The Negev; I will engage in a photographic documentary of the people and landscape of Israel. The goal is to create a comprehensive body of images of the country that are licensed as free content, meaning my work will be available to everyone via Wikimedia for both commercial and non-commercial uses.

Watch this blog for updates.

In his own blog 2009/03/04 Shankbone writes more on his new Israel trip, where he will be joined by “baroness of social media, Tamar Weinberg, and her photographer husband”“Consul David Saranga in the Israeli Foreign Ministry [...] was instrumental in putting the trip together” (http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/03/04/my-israel-trip-covered-in-jewish-week/):

My Israel trip covered in Jewish Week

By David Shankbone

Sharon Udasin recently wrote in Jewish Week about my upcoming photography expedition of Israel for the creative commons. Also on the plane will be the baroness of social media, Tamar Weinberg, and her photographer husband. The itinerary is not set, but I have requested an interview for Wikinews. Because the focus is on photography, most of my writing will take place on this blog where I hope to document the experience. Consul David Saranga in the Israeli Foreign Ministry, who has spear-headed his country’s foray into social media, was instrumental in putting the trip together.

My goal here will be to document not just the monuments and public structures that every tourist documents, but also common, every-day features of life and landscape. Cities like Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are not crying out for free media (although they can always use more professional-quality shots). Instead, places like the Arava Valley, the kiryats and the kibbutzes need coverage.

I want to capture life outside the scope of a rifle. That not every Israeli is armed, living in rubble or dodging missiles is lost in a media narrative that filters everything through conflict. The hope is to obtain shots of the country not typically obtained by tourists and photojournalists. Small town and rural Israel holds all the appeal for me.

More tricks to control information in Wikipedia

But corrupting the very top names of Wikipedia for Israel´s cause is not enough. Jewish students, paid by Hasbara fellowships from the Israeli government, are mobilized to edit Wikipedia in a pro-Israel manner.

The images and text below are from a Hasbara newsletter dated May 2007.

Hasbara is an Israeli institution that gives fellowships to Jewish students around the world and also aids them in organizing “Israel Advocacy”, i.e. Israel-propaganda.

We also recommend reading the following articles:

 

Jimmy Wales counting the bucks

 

 

 

 


Yahoo!

 

 

 

Yahoo Jew Terry Semel

 

 

Yahoo! in Jewish hands

The Jew Terry Semel was CEO of the search engine company Yahoo! between 2001 and 2007.

During his time as Yahoo! CEO Semel used his position to impress on his fellow Jews. For instance Semel in the shape of Yahoo-boss appeared as one of the main speakers at the Jewish Community Federation in San Fransisco´s meeting, January 25, 2006, according to the organization´s homepage (http://www.sfjcf.org/aboutJCF/photos/album/default.asp?album=blcbreakfast-jan2006&page=1):

300 JCF donors gathered at the Julia Morgan Ballroom to kibbitz and build a Jewish network of business professionals. Featured speaker Yahoo! CEO Terry Semel gave an engaging, personal talk, sharing his views on philanthropy and leadership.

 

 

 

Terry Semel speaks at Jewish Community Federation in San Fransisco

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Jewish site Jweekly.com writes on the event:

Yahoo CEO talks of philanthropy, teamwork at JCF event

Friday, February 17, 2006

By Maureen Earl, correspondent

With more than 420 million users around the world, Yahoo can claim a high spot on the Internet echelon. But it wasn’t always smooth sailing for the Sunnyvale-based company.

When Yahoo’s chairman and CEO, Jewish Brooklyn native Terry Semel, first arrived at the company in 2001, it had just lost $98 million on revenue of $717 million. Semel was determined to put Yahoo back in the black.

His strategy worked. Last year Yahoo earned $1.2 billion on sales of $5.3 billion — and those 420 million users aren’t bad, either.

On Jan. 25 Semel addressed 300 donors to the S.F.-based Jewish Community Federation who gathered for the JCF’s first Business Leadership Council breakfast.

Semel, once one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood and now one of the most commanding leaders in Internet technology, started the keynote address by announcing that he was not a morning person.

“I prefer to take an hour to reflect and catch up in the morning,” he said.

Soft-spoken but authoritative, Semel discussed the importance of philanthropy in business. “Business and philanthropy go hand in hand,” he said. “I came from a lower-income family in Brooklyn, yet by the age of 10 or 12 I’d already been taught the importance of giving.

“You need to start kids off that young so that it becomes a habit. To accomplish things you also have to give. At first maybe with time, then later with money, and eventually even both if you are able.”At the age of 10 it was a dollar from his allowance; today, Semel no longer thinks on a small scale.

“I now think in terms of hundreds of millions,” he said, “but the same principles apply whether it’s a two-person philanthropy organization or a giant like Yahoo.”

Tikkun olam, repairing the world, is how Semel operates both in philanthropy and business. He recalled how, as an ambitious young man working as a sales trainee at Warner Bros. in the mid-1960s, his boss would arrive shouting and yelling at all and sundry.

“There and then I decided I would not do that. How people are treated is vital.”

Semel, who graduated in 1964 with an accounting degree from Long Island University, went on to become chairman and CEO of Warner Bros. During his 24-year career there, Semel and his business partner, Robert Daly, helped shape the company into one of the world’s largest media outlets, generating nearly $11 billion in total revenue from businesses in 50 countries.

In 1999, Semel and Daly pressed their hands into wet concrete outside Hollywood’s legendary Mann’s Chinese Theater. With the executives thus immortalized in Hollywood lore, the ceremony marked the last day of work for the two at Warner Bros.

In May 2001, after an 18-month hiatus, Semel joined Yahoo as CEO and chairman immediately after the dot-com collapse in Silicon Valley.

“I was looking for a challenge. I didn’t take the position for the money,” he said.

Whether he was looking for it or not, Semel has netted $403 million by exercising Yahoo options and selling shares. He still owns shares and options worth more than $230 million.

The credit of Yahoo’s success, Semel said, goes to his staff and their practiced team ability.

“It’s always about team. No one wins if it rests on one star athlete. The superstar ideal will not get you to the Super Bowl, it’s not sustainable. It has to be the team. And we [at Yahoo] actually like each other — we love the challenge.”

Last year Yahoo added 220 people a month and now employs about 10,000. Daniel Rosensweig, Yahoo’s chief operating officer, said, “Terry’s a Brooklynite at heart. He expects a new fight every day.”

One of the biggest challenges Semel faces is adapting the company to fit its users’ ever-changing preferences.

“The big change in technology is that we used to have someone else program everything for us,” he said. “Someone else programmed television, so you watched what was on when it was on. Internet has turned the user into programmers — we want what we want, when we want, and we get it.”

On Friday evenings, Semel boards his private jet in Sunnyvale and returns to his family and home in Bel Air for the weekend. There he is able to relax for a couple of days knowing that he has helped grow Yahoo into a company that has the widest global reach of any Internet site.

Not shabby for a man who, prior to joining Yahoo, had rarely gone near a computer.

Semel may constantly redirect attention to his team, but he is very much an individual. “I would not have succeeded had I not been true to myself. I never wanted to be the guy who looks back and says ‘I wish I’d done this, done that,’” he said.

Summing up Semel´s pre-Yahoo! career

Prior to Yahoo! – as stated in the article above – Semel worked in Hollywood where he spent 24 years at Warner Bros. As its chairman and co-chief executive officer, Semel and his partner built the company into one of the world’s largest entertainment enterprises. Prior to Warner Bros., Semel was in charge of Walt Disney’s Theatrical Distribution division and he has also been in charge of CBS’ Theatrical Distribution division.

Terry Semel is a friend of Arnon Milchan, the Jewish Hollywood producer with Mossad connections, and was one of the invited att Milchan´s Israel party 2008, a party co-organized by the Israeli consulate (The Jewish Journal, September 25, 2008).

Other Yahoo! Jews

The Israeli Jew Andrei Broder, a graduate from Israel´s Technion Institute, is Vice President for Search & Computational Advertising at Yahoo! Research. Broder also serves as Chief Scientist of Yahoo’s Advertising Technology Group. He has previously worked for AltaVista as the Vice President of research and for IBM Research as a Distinguished Engineer and CTO of IBM’s Institute for Search and Text Analysis.

David Goldberg was Vice President and General Manager of Music at Yahoo! Inc., since the acquisition of LAUNCH Media, Inc. by Yahoo! in August 2001. David Goldberg is married to and has kids with Sheryl Sandberg, the Jewish Internet boss formerly with Google and presently “second-in-command” in Facebook (see our long entry on her in our Google section).

Goldberg left Yahoo! in 2007.

The Israeli engineer Udi Manber, also a graduate from the Israeli Technion Institute and who we portray in more depth in our section onGoogle, was chief scientist at Yahoo! from 1998 to 2002. Manber then joined Amazon.com where he became “chief algorithms officer” and a Vice President. He was later appointed CEO of the Amazon subsidiary company A9.com, where he led the company’s A9 search engine work. In 2006, he was hired by Google as one of their Vice Presidents of engineering.

 

 

 

Andrei Broder

 

 

 

 

 

David Goldberg

 

 

 

 

 

Udi Manber

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yahoo! and Israel

Semel was in Israel during the festive events 2008, celebrating Israel´s 60th anniversary. Semel appeared as a speaker on Shimon Peres’ “President’s Conference” in Israel May 15, on the topic “The Revolution of the Internet and the new media”, together with Google´s Jewish co-founder and President Sergey Brin. Semel was here to represent his post-Yahoo! company Windsor Media, where he is chairman and CEO.

Susan Decker, the present President of Yahoo! Inc., also attended and spoke at the 2008 Israel conference. Decker is the person that took over the Presidency over Yahoo! directly after Semel.

The Israeli paper Ha´aretz writes:

Facebook, Google founders to attend Jerusalem conference in May

By Guy Grimland, Ha´aretz Correspondent

Ha´aretz 01/04/2008

Co-founder of internet giant Google, Sergey Brin, will join Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, and Yahoo president Susan Decker at a presidential panel on technology to be held at the Jerusalem International Convention Center May 13-15.

The convention, which was formed at the initiative of President Shimon Peres, will also be attended by a number of Israeli political, religious and financial leaders, as well as academics and cultural figures.

The panel will discuss issues facing technology in today’s age and the future, in particular in regard to how it will affect Israel and the Jewish world.

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair will also take part in the conference, as will French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former prime minister of the Czech Republic Vaclev Havel, Nobel Prize Laureate Eli Wiesel, and Georgia President Michael Saakashvili

Other Zionist participants at the meeting were Rupert Murdoch and Maurice Levy, the latter a powerful French Jew with enormous might in the advertisement/publicity business (PublicisSaatchi & Saatchi), and a man very dedicated to promoting Israel´s image. 

The meeting was moderated by Israel´s “technology guru” Yossi Vardi, whom Yahoo! already had business dealings with (see below).

The “President’s Conference” figured other speeches by staunch Zionists such as Israel´s Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and “American” agents of Israel such as Dennis Ross and Henry Kissinger.

And the collaboration between Yahoo! and Israel deepens

Here follows three Ha´aretz articles on the subject.

Yahoo! President Susan Decker takes interest in Israel

By Haaretz Staff and Channel 10, May 18, 2008

Susan Decker, the president of Yahoo! Incorporated, visited Jerusalem last week to attend the 2008 Presidential Conference.

Decker oversees one of the most popular Web sites in the world, with more than 400 million page views daily. She is the second highest paid female executive in the United States, with 14,000 people working under her.

Decker suggests that Yahoo! exemplifies the fact that the glass ceiling she was spared is a thing of the past.

Internet giant Yahoo! to follow rivals Google, Microsoft to Israel

By Raz Smolsky and Maayan Cohen

Ha´aretz 14/01/2008

Internet giant Yahoo! is coming to Israel, and not only over the Net. The company is taking its battle for survival against Google and Microsoft to Israel on two levels. It will open a research and development center in Haifa, and will also enter the content side of the business here for the first time through a cooperation agreement with Walla!, which is partly owned by Haaretz.

Yahoo! is following Google, which set up R&D centers in Tel Aviv and Haifa, as well as establishing a marketing center that also deals in joint content arrangements with Israeli portals. Microsoft, meanwhile, has set up a sales and marketing branch in Ra’anana, as well as R&D centers in Tel Aviv and Herzliya.

Yahoo! is now negotiating office space in the Matam high-tech park in Haifa; and is expected to open its research center within a few months.

Google kicked off in the Middle East with its Haifa R&D center in July 2006, despite the Second Lebanon War at the time; the center was its first in the region and only its fourth outside of the U.S. Other well-known companies in the Matam industrial park include Intel, Microsoft, Elbit and Zim.

Yahoo!’s first foray into the Israeli content market is based on a strategic deal signed with portal Walla!. The goal is to threaten Google’s hegemony in the Israeli search market for the first time and the real challenge is to compete in search-based advertising.

Under the long-term deal signed between Yahoo! and Walla!, the technology and databases will come from Yahoo!, but the search engine will be branded as Walla! Search, the name of Walla!’s present engine.

Only six months ago there were reports that Walla! was negotiating with Google in the search market, but no agreement was ever reached. Google usually partners with a local search engine by providing the technology and the advertisements, while the revenues are split.

The joint Walla!-Yahoo! venture will continue using Walla!’s AdVantage platform. This will allow Walla! to continue to manage the advertising itself, and it will receive a higher percentage of the revenues than in a deal that also included advertising, such as Google proposed.

According to Walla! CEO Ilan Yeshua: “The search and advertising in search results sector is one of the fastest growing in the world, and also in Israel. The agreement with Yahoo! allows us to offer Walla!’s surfers an excellent search product … for the Israeli user. The agreement will help Walla! increase its market share in the search-based advertising market. The existence of another strong player in the search and textual advertising sector will contribute to competitiveness , both in the search experience and in the range of possibilities available to advertisers.”

Yahoo! and Walla! had previously discussed technological cooperation in the past, but nothing serious came of it. Walla!’s previous management, replaced in 2006, was never willing to allow outsiders to share its advertising revenues.

Israeli Internet advertising was estimated at $90 million in 2007, 10% of the total advertising pie. Of this figure, search engine advertising took about half, $40-50 million, the large majority of which went to Google.

Yahoo buys no-sales FoxyTunes for $40m

By Guy Griml

Ha´aretz, February 05, 2008

Yahoo, the Internet giant that Microsoft wants to take over, is gearing up for its second Israeli investment: FoxyTunes, owned by entrepreneurs Vitaly and Alex Sirota. The exact amount has not been announced, but sources close to the situation say the company will go for between $30 million and $40 million.

The Sirota brothers, new immigrants from Russia, are the big winners in the deal, along with Yossi Vardi and a group of private investors from the United States. Initial investment in the company is estimated at just a few million, and the brothers will be raking in a total of $15 million.

[...]

“We will become part of Yahoo Entertainment, and they will distribute the FoxyTunes toolbar to as many people as possible.”

More on Jewish Internet actor Semel…

Semel is currently on the Board of Directors of Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Emerson College, and the Guggenheim Museum. But he still continues his favourite pastime, which he describes in a Hebrew-language interview in the Israeli The Globe, as:

I’m busy mostly with in searching for interesting companies in order to purchase and invest in, and I’m certain that they’ll be heard of in the coming years.

Terry´s daughter Courtenay Semel is also in the spotlight. The Jewish site Jewtastic writes:

Semel Reveals She Was Lohan’s First Jewish Gay Lover

By Jewtastic Staff

August 18th, 2008

Lindsay Lohan embarked on a secret lesbian affair with aspiring actress Courtenay Semel before meeting [Jewish] Samantha Ronson, it has been claimed.

Semel – the daughter of former Yahoo! CEO Terry Semel – insists she was the Mean Girls star’s first gay love.

But she claims they kept their affair secret because of the actress’ fear of coming out to the world.

She said: “Everyone thinks Samantha is Lindsay’s first lesbian love, but we were very passionate until her fear of being found out drove us apart. At the time she was terrified her career would be over if she revealed her sexual tendencies. But then Samantha came on to the scene and I was dropped.”

 

 

Terry Semel doing the classic “palms-out” pose

 


MySpace

MySpace is a social networking website with an interactive, user-submitted network of friends, personal profiles, blogs, groups, photos, music, and videos for teenagers and adults internationally.

Jewish co-founders and President

The MySpace project was overseen by Brad Greenspan (eUniverse’s Founder, Chairman, CEO), who managed Chris DeWolfe (MySpace’s starting CEO), Josh BermanTom Anderson (MySpace’s starting President), and a team of programmers and resources provided by eUniverse.

Known Jews in this lot are Anderson, Greenspan and Berman.

As one Jewish blogger writes:

The website was co-founded by Tom Anderson. Although Tom’s last name reflects his father’s Scottish heritage, he and his mother are Jewish and he was raised in a messianic Jewish household.

Josh Berman, the other Jewish co-founder of MySpace.com, also served as the company’s Chief Operating Officer. 

 

 

President Tom Anderson (right) and Chris DeWolfe (left)

 

 

Jewish Vice Presidents including an Israeli paratrooper (reserves)

Another Jew, Richard Rosenblatt, was former Chairman of MySpace and thus earned the title the “MySpace guru”.

The Jew Travis Katz is presently the international head of MySpace and a senior Vice President (2009).

 

 

 

Richard Rosenblatt

 

 

 

 

 

Travis Katz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Josh Brooks

 

 

 

 

Among other names as senior Vice Presidents we have Shawn Gold, the Israeli Nimrod Lev (former Israeli paratroopers and military intelligence) and Josh Brooks. Whether Steve Pearman also is Jewish, we don´t know.

Another Jew – with political insights – is Jeff Berman who joined MySpace in 2006 as Senior Vice President of Public Affairs. In 2007, Berman was promoted to General Manager of MySpaceTV (http://myspacetv.com), where he oversaw the launch of the company’s global video platform. There he cooperated with media JewsMichael EisnerMarshall Herskovitz and Edward Zwick. In 2008 Berman was appointed Executive Vice President of Marketing and Content of MySpace, responsible for spearheading the development and implementation of marketing initiatives and campaigns for MySpace’s more than 110 million users worldwide. Berman will thus report to MySpace’s CEO and co-founder Chris DeWolfe.

Before joining MySpace, from 2001-2005, Berman served as Chief Counsel to the Jewish U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer and Staff Director of the Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts. 

 

 

Jeff Berman, MySpace Jew with political insights

 

 

MySpace, and its parent company eUniverse (now renamed Intermix Media) was bought in July 2005 for US$ 580 million by arch-ZionistRupert Murdoch‘s News Corporation.

Murdoch is a fanatic pro-Israeli. In the Jewish magazine 15 Minutes, Issue 26, July 1, 2001, one could read:

[Murdoch] explained at a Museum of Jewish Heritage dinner at the Waldorf-Astoria that, “I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community”.

MySpace and Israel

The Israeli paper Ha´aretz writes, January 09, 2007:

Hey, Israeli startups – MySpace wants you

By Lior Haner

Even though most Israeli entrepreneurs say they want to develop their startups into large companies, most secretly wish for generous purchase offers from abroad – and may even prefer working as senior vice presidents in an American corporation.

Both of these wishes were granted to Israeli Internet serial entrepreneur Nimrod Lev, 35, who founded KSolo in 2005, sold it last summer to Fox Interactive Media and now works as a senior vice president at Fox.

Fox Interactive is owned by the media conglomerate News Corp., and owns the popular MySpace Internet Web site. Lev is currently on a personal trip to Israel, and will be speaking at the Israel Management Center’s convention this coming Sunday, January 7, where participants will choose the 2006 high-tech CEO of the year.

Haner’s current visit is his first to Israel since selling KSolo and he does not hide his intentions to find more Israeli Internet entrepreneurs for Fox’s acquisitions department. “If there is a company can benefit FOx’s MySpace, I would rather find it in Israel than elsewhere,” explains Lev.

Despite his Israeli background and the fact that there are other Israelis who could assist companies in penetrating the American market, Lev insists that due to the cultural gaps and problems in understanding one another, any company that wants to succeed overseas needs a local presence.

This week Lev hopes to meet with representatives of several Israeli companies whose products are in their initial stages, to form ties between them and Fox. Lev believes that the next big high-tech field combines the Internet and cellular services, but he has not revealed which Israeli companies he thinks have the best potential, or with whom he is meeting. In the meantime, he has been heaping praises on the more established and familiar Internet companies, such as Jajah, Oberon Media and Quigo Technologies.

He also feels the biggest underachieving company in recent years is Babylon, the interactive dictionary developer, which Lev says could have been much more successful. During his visit, Lev will share his experience and relate the story of his ascent to the upper echelons of the American Internet industry.

Lev started out as an editor at the Israeli Internet portal Walla in 1996, a job he landed after editing the student newspaper at Tel Aviv’s College of Management.

Firing Cupid’s arrow

In 1999 Lev left Walla to join Zion Madmon, the founder of cupid.co.il, to help promote that company and develop it abroad, thus beginning his journey to American Internet.

“We established JCupid, which joined forces with JDate,” recalls Lev. “In 2004, Cupid was sold to Spark Networks, which operates JDate. That was my first exit and I immediately started looking for my next project and remained in the United States. The next thing turned out to be KSolo.” KSolo, run by the Israeli developers of Cupid and headed by Lev in New York, is a site for karaoke singing and recording.

Lev says that his secret to success is not developing something that he thinks users want, but something that users need. The product does not have to be connected to the success of other sites or the entrepreneur’s personal background.

“I was no longer a bachelor when I began matchmaking on the Web and had no connection to karaoke when I founded KSolo, but it seemed to me like a necessary product. One does not always have to invent the wheel. One can take something that works well in the real world and adapt it for the Internet. This was the case with the two companies I founded,” he says.

“At KSolo, we signed an agreement with all the major copyright holders of the songs in America and share the revenues with them,” Lev adds, adding that in the Internet era, content has so far been considered the main thing.

“One has to understand that in the past two years, the user has become the focal point,” continues Lev, “and it is the users who control the content.”

Lev’s path to the Fox deal began like that of many Internet entrepreneurs, with a fund-raising campaign by private investors.

“The investors were American,” relates Lev. “It is easier to raise money in the U.S. It depends on the project, but usually Israelis find it harder to spend money. It is something in their blood. Israeli market evaluations are lower, because Israelis were burned more severely by the bursting of the high-tech bubble. Since the American Internet market was much more advanced, many companies had already had exits, while in Israel, the industry collapsed a moment before companies closed deals, and the sting of the previous experience affects investors’ decisions to this day.”

In the summer of 2006, about a year after KSolo went on the air, Lev received a telephone call from, Tom Andersen, one of Fox’s senior executives, who is also the president of MySpace. He had discovered a karaoke recording by a KSolo user on the user’s personal site at MySpace.

“The negotiations [with Fox] were quick and very serious,” recalls Lev. “For a few weeks I attended a great many meetings, at which [Fox representatives] explained to me exactly what they wanted. They exhibited a level of perseverance and determination I had not encountered before and did not waste any time, something critical to startups.”

Lev would not disclose how much he received for the company, but commented that the investors received a good return on their money. After the sale, Lev was appointed a senior vice president at Fox, where he continues to be responsible for KSolo’s operations.

The Jewish Vitual Library wrote in their article on MySpace´s Lev Nimrod´s (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Nimrod_Lev.html) connection to the Israeli military:

Ironically enough, it was war-not love-that prepared Lev for his career and reinforced his belief in promulgating the Jewish faith via Jewish marriages. Military service is compulsory in Israel-women serve two years and men three. Lev, however, opted to serve five: three years as a paratrooper in a combat unit and then two years in charge of an intelligence unit that focused on anti-terrorist tactics. Today, he is a captain in the reserves.

“When you walk 60 miles with 40 pounds on you, everything else looks easy,” he says. “I wish that young people didn’t have to go through this. At this age-after high school graduation-they should be thinking about chasing down dates not about chasing terrorists. But I know that until we find peace, everyone has to contribute to Israel’s safety. We’re defending Israel so Jews all over the world will have a place to feel safe. This is one of the reasons we need to do whatever we can to bring Jews together.”

 

 

 

Lev Nimrod

 

 

The Guardian on how Israel´s Foreign Office tries to promote Israel via MySpace:

Israel seeks friends through MySpace

By Bobbie Johnson, technology correspondent

The Guardian, Saturday 24 March 2007

A 58-year-old Jerusalem woman is not a typical MySpace user – the hugely popular social networking site is inhabited mostly by people at least 30 years younger.

But the profile she is reading is a profile with a difference: it represents the entire state of Israel. Officials hope that running a MySpace page dedicated to Israel will help improve relations with people from other countries, and increase awareness and communication with those under 35.

The idea belongs to David Saranga, a diplomat based at the Israeli consulate in New York. Mr Saranga said research had shown Israel’s image among the young was not good, and that by reaching out through one of the internet’s most popular sites he could repair some of the damage.

“We saw that we had a problem with the 18 to 35 age group. The reason is that this group doesn’t see Israel as relevant.We have to talk to them in their language, in platforms they are using, and the new media is one of the ways to do so,” he said.

The page is particularly targeted at young Americans, who make up a large proportion of MySpace users. Since Mr Saranga set up the page, “Israel” has gained 963 friends from around the world, including fictional characters such as TV secret agent Jack Bauer and Star Wars heroine Princess Leia, as well as, it is claimed, the Hollywood actors George Clooney and Leonardo Di Caprio.

The pages include pictures of Israeli cities, as well as music that invites the audience to question the cycle of violence and to “end this holy war”. Among Mr Saranga’s other initiatives are a blog called “isRealli” and an internet TV station. 

 

 

Shawn Gold of MySpace

 

 

Article from Prison Planet.com on arch-Zionist Murdoch´s “cyber trojan horse”:

MySpace Is The Trojan Horse Of Internet Censorship

Media elite’s last gasp effort to save crumbling empire

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 16 2006

MySpace isn’t cool, it isn’t hip and it isn’t trendy. It represents a cyber trojan horse and the media elite’s last gasp effort to reclaim control of the Internet and sink it with a stranglehold of regulation, control and censorship.

Since Rupert Murdoch’s $580 Million acquisition of MySpace in July 2005, it has come from total obscurity to now being the 8th most visited website in the world, receiving half as many page hits as Google, despite the fact that on first appearance it looks like a 5-year-old’s picture scrap and scribble book.

MySpace is the new mobile phone. If you don’t have a MySpace account then you belong to some kind of culturally shunned underclass.

What most of the trendy wendy’s remain blissfully unaware of is the fact that MySpace is Rupert Murdoch’s battle axe for shaping a future Internet environment whereby electronic dissent, whether it be against corporations or government, will not tolerated and freedom of e-speech will cease to exist.

MySpace has been caught shutting down blogs critical of itself and other Murdoch owned companies. They even had the audacity to censor links to completely different websites when clicking through for MySpace. When 600 MySpace users complained, MySpace deleted the blog forum that the complaints were posted on. Taking their inspiration from Communist China, MySpace regularly uses blanket censorship to block out words like ‘God’.

Earlier this week Rupert Murdoch sounded the death knell for conventional forms of media in stating that the media elite were losing their monopoly to the rapid and free spread of new communication technologies. Murdoch stressed the need to regain control of these outlets in order to prevent the establishment media empire from crumbling.

MySpace is Rupert Murdoch’s trojan horse for destroying free speech on the Internet. It is a foundational keystone of the first wave of the state’s backlash to the damage that a free and open Internet has done to their organs of propaganda. By firstly making it cool, trendy and culturally elite for millions to flock to establishment controlled Internet backbones like MySpace, Murdoch is preparing the groundwork for the day when it will stop being voluntary and become mandatory to use government and corporate monopoly controlled Internet hubs.

The end game is a system similar to or worse than China, whereby no websites even mildly critical of the government will be authorized.

The Pentagon admitted that they would engage in psychological warfare and cyber attacks on ‘enemy’ Internet websites in an attempt to shut them down. The fact that the NSA surveillance program spied on 5,000 Americans tells us that the enemy is the alternative media and that it will be targeted for elimination. Google has been ordered to turn over information about its users by a judge to the US government.

The second wave of destroying freedom of speech online will simply attempt to price people out of using the conventional Internet and force people over to Internet 2, a state regulated hub where permission will need to be obtained directly from an FCC or government bureau to set up a website.

The original Internet will then be turned into a mass surveillance database and marketing tool. The Nation magazine reported, “Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets–corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers–would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out.”

The original Internet will deliberately be subject to crash upon crash until it becomes a useless carcass of overpriced trash and its reputation will be defiled by the TV and media barons cashing in on the perfectly streamlined Internet 2, the free for all network that just requires you to thumbscan in order to log on! Those with a security grading below yellow on their national ID card will unfortunately be refused access. Websites that carry hate speech (ones that talk about government corruption) will be censored for the betterment of society.

For the aspiring dictator, the Internet is a dangerous tool that has been seized by the enemy. We have come a long way since 1969, when the ARPANET was created solely for US government use. The Internet is freedom’s best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power and subjugate the world under a global surveillance panopticon prison.

Rupert Murdoch’s MySpace and its ceaseless promotion by the establishment media as the best thing since sliced bread is part of this movement. In saying all this we do encourage everyone to set up a MySpace account, but only if you’re going to use it to bash MySpace, Rupert Murdoch and copy and paste this article right at the top of the page! See how long it is before your account is terminated.


 

 

eBay

The Jewish boasting page www.jewishachievement.com writes on the Jewish first President of eBay, the Canadian-born Jeff Skoll:

Jeff Skoll did not create eBay, non-Jew Pierre Omidyar did in 1993. For Omidyar, born to French and Iranian parents, creating an on-line auction Web-site was a Labor Day weekend hobby project. For its first couple of years, it was simply a free Web-site Omidyar ran on his own home page along with several other of his Web page creations. During the first few months, he tried to recruit Skoll, a Jewish French-Canadian he met through friends, to become his partner. Skoll turned him down, choosing to remain at Stanford Business School.

In early 1996, Omidyar’s Internet service provider began charging him $250 a month to host the site. Omidyar was forced to start charging a fee, which he passed along to the site’s users based on the sale price of auction items. As the checks started rolling in Omidyar realized he needed help. Again, he approached Skoll. This time, after a few months of consulting for eBay, Skoll signed on as its first full time employee and President.

 

Jeff Skoll

 

 

 

 

Skoll grew up in Canada and showed early signs of being a driven entrepreneur. At twelve, he was selling Amway products door-to-door. After graduating from the University of Toronto with a 4.0 grade point average, he set up two high tech companies before moving to Palo Alto to enroll at Stanford Business School. Compensating for Omidyar’s easy going ways and enjoyment of programming, Skoll was the driven leader who planned the business and made things happen. He hired key people, established much of the culture, and constantly pushed to build the business.

The result is the number one auction Web site in the world. It grossed $3.9 billion in 2004, netted $936 million and was worth $53 billion by mid 2005, all of which made both Omidyar and Skoll very wealthy. Skoll has since left eBay and now devotes the bulk of his time to philanthropic activities, particularly his Skoll Foundation to which he has donated $250 million. The Foundation supports social entrepreneurs working to effect lasting positive social changes worldwide. In 2003, Skoll won recognition from Business Week magazine as “one of the most innovative philanthropists of the past decade”

 

Ed Skoll also interacts with fellow Jewish Internet entrepreneurs. We have named the Israel-loving financier and Board member of Facebook, Peter Thiel, in our section on that company.

Thiel togeher with the Ukrainan Jew Max Rafael Levchinfounded PayPal. The company was then bought by eBay. In an excerpt from “Once You’re Lucky, Twice You’re Good: The Rebirth of Silicon Valley and the Rise of Web 2.0″, by Sarah Lacy, (see: http://www.metroactive.com/metro/06.11.08/cover-supermen-0824.html ), we can see how Skoll “became friends with the PayPal crew” of Jews and even entered the movie business:

The PayPal mafia even had Hollywood success. Jeff Skoll was one of the first eBay executives who became friends with the PayPal crew when eBay bought the company in 2002. He started up Participant Productions on a lark, and it has been one of the most profitable productions companies in Hollywood. Among its first four films were Syriana, Good Night, and Good Luck, North Country, and An Inconvenient Truth. Skoll’s success convinced Max and Peter to start dabbling in Hollywood, bankrolling the 2006 indie flick Thank You for Smoking, along with David Sacks, PayPal’s former chief operating officer.

While Sacks continued to play the Hollywood game, he also launched a new social networking site for families, called Geni.com. It allows people to fill out their family trees and link them to the family trees of spouses and in-laws. Anyone on the tree can add to the tree, the idea being that over time you discover people you’re related to that you didn’t know. It’s a bold idea, one of the first Web 2.0 start-ups aimed squarely at families. Peter Thiel, naturally, backed it early on. And in Geni’s first venture capital round with Charles River Ventures, it got nosebleed $100 million valuation. The CRV partner who wrote the check was George Zachary, Skoll’s early partner in Participant Productions and a friend of Max and Peter’s. By 2006, the PayPal mafia was an incestuous world where, for now, everyone seemed to be making lots of money.

Just to clarify both David Sacks, PayPal’s former chief operating officer, and George Zachary“Skoll’s early partner in Participant Productions and a friend of Max and Peter’s”, are Jewish.

Another Jew in Skoll´s present entourage is Larry Brilliant who we detail more in our section on Google where he for 3 years was responsible for Google´s philanthropic arm Google.org. In 2009 Brilliant joined a new organisation set up by Jeff Skoll. But Dr. Brilliant also said he would remain as an advisor to Google.

Skoll was President of eBay until 1998 when he became Vice President, Strategic Planning and Analysis, until back problems necessitated his departure from full-time employment at the company. Once eBay’s second largest stockholder (behind only Omidyar) he subsequently cashed out a portion of his company holdings, yielding him around $2 billion.

 

 

Jeff Skoll of eBay

 

 


Yossi Vardi – “Israeli technology guru”

 

Article from European Jewish Congress, Thursday, May 22, 2008:

Yossi Vardi: Israel’s ’Mr. Tech’

By Jennifer L. Schenker

It’s May 15, and Israeli technology guru Yossi Vardi is moderating a session on the future of the Internet at a conference in Jerusalem. On stage with the fatherly 65-year-old is a who’s who of tech and media bigwigs, including Google (GOOG) co-founder Sergey Brin, Yahoo ! (YHOO) President Susan Decker, and News Corp. (NWS) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch.

Vardi (right in the above photo) isn’t the least bit cowed by their eminence. In his irrepressible manner, he calls out to the crowd : “How many Israeli entrepreneurs in the audience want to do business with Yahoo ?” He then tries to get Decker to give out her personal e-mail address. (She declines.) Vardi settles for announcing the e-mail of Yahoo’s head of European operations to the scores of entrepreneurs who have raised their hands.

Undoubtedly the most prominent and connected tech entrepreneur in Israel, Vardi makes no bones about his objectives. The point of moderating the tech panel, he says later with a laugh, was to “shamelessly promote Israel’s high-tech sector.” The same evening, he tries to convince Brin to do more business in Israel by dragging the Google co-founder and his parents to a dilapidated warehouse in the suburbs of Tel Aviv to introduce them to 300 Israeli “garage geeks” who tinker there.

Now this goodwill ambassador-long known for his connections in Silicon Valley-has been tapped by the Israeli government to help deepen ties with Europe. Vardi was recently named co-chairman-alongside Mathias Döpfner, the chief executive of German media company Axel Springer (SPRGN)-of a group called the EU-Israel Business Dialogue. Its aim is to foster business relations between Israel and Europe through events such as the upcoming Israel Innovation Day in Germany on June 16.

Making Deals, Earning Respect

Although the panel’s work is just getting under way, Europe’s big tech companies have already been eyeing Israeli innovation for some time. In March, a France Telecom (FTE) subsidiary spent $21.4 million for a startup called Orca Interactive, based in Ra’anana, near Tel Aviv, that develops Internet TV software and applications. Germany’s Deutsche Telekom (DT) has opened a research and development laboratory at Israel’s Ben-Gurion University focused on network security. And Britain’s BT Group (BT) is “actively scouting for Israeli technologies to use either ourselves or for our customers,” says Gary Shainberg, BT’s vice-president for technology and innovation support.

Such deals are welcome news to Vardi, who founded his first technology startup in 1969 and has gone on to be involved in more than 60 Israeli tech ventures. He has taken seven companies public and sold many others-the most famous of which was ICQ, the first Internet instant-messaging company, which was acquired by AOL (TWX) for more than $400 million.

But more than his financial success, what has turned the avuncular Vardi into Israel’s Mr. Tech is relentless networking, his passionate belief in the cause, and generosity with his time and money. Known for his love of gadgets and mischievous sense of humor, Vardi has plowed his gains from ICQ and other successes back into startups, serving as angel investor and mentor to scores of young Israelis. He now counts more than 40 companies in his investment portfolio, and spends much of his time traveling around the world to promote these and other Israeli companies at business events.

That commitment and kindness has earned Vardi legions of admirers, including Shimon Peres, the President of Israel, who calls him Israel’s “best ambassador” to the world of science and technology. Vardi isn’t in it for the money, Peres insists. “He is after the science itself. He really and sincerely wakes up in the morning, opens his eyes, and asks, ’God, what can I discover of your secrets today ?’ And once he has it, he will relate it to others.”

Groundbreaking Generosity

There’s another motivation as well, says Vardi, who had a long civil service career in Israel : what he calls modern day Zionism. “I belong to the generation that witnessed the creation of the state,” Vardi says. “I still remember the dancing in the streets on the 29th of November, 1947, so for me, what I am doing, is a current manifestation of pioneering the building of the state of Israel.”

At times, Vardi may be too much of a soft touch. He says he hates to read business plans and instead goes with his gut-sometimes even committing to investments over the phone if he believes in the entrepreneur making the pitch. “My wife, Thalma, who keeps me connected to the ground, tells me it doesn’t make sense that every kid with shining eyes walks away from a meeting with me with a check,” says Vardi. “But I tell her if I lose the money at least it goes to nice people and allows them to follow their dreams. Who wants to give money to jerks?”

Thanks in part to his involvement, high tech now represents a vibrant portion of Israel’s economy (BusinessWeek.com, 5/13/08). But the domestic market is so small that Israeli tech companies have to grow their businesses quickly in the U.S. and Europe. Nobody can open doors abroad like Vardi, say entrepreneurs and executives.

“Yossi is a super-node,” says BT’s Shainberg. “He connects people and companies from around the world to leverage the world-beating technology innovation in Israel.” With the help of Vardi and the Israeli Trade & Industry Assn., Shainberg is bringing a group of Israeli tech entrepreneurs to London on June 10-11 to meet with executives from the British phone company and its partners.

Forging Relationships

Indeed, Vardi’s web of connections spreads throughout the Continent. He has, for instance, a long-standing relationship with German publishing company Hubert Burda Media, acting as an informal adviser on digital strategies. A few years back, he helped the company set up a conference called Cool Companies in the Hot Desert that brought a group of German tech entrepreneurs to Israel. “Yossi is a connector, a sharer, a giver, a storyteller,” says Stephanie Czerny, Burda’s managing director in charge of R&D, marketing, and communication.

The success of the event led Vardi and Burda CEO Hubert Burda (left in the photo) to launch what has quickly become one of Europe’s most important technology conferences, known as Digital, Life, Design, or DLD. The annual event now draws 1,000 attendees every January, and this year Vardi brought 150 Israeli Internet entrepreneurs along with him to the conference to introduce them to potential investors and business partners.

Vardi thrives on forging those sorts of links. “Yossi has an amazing capability and will to connect people,” says Tal Keinan, CEO of an Israeli startup called SemantiNet, one of the companies in Vardi’s portfolio. “This is priceless for a startup.”

Keinan found that out firsthand when Vardi invited him to a private dinner in London in April. Held in the BT Tower, the exclusive event included senior executives from Apple (AAPL), Yahoo, Hutchison Europe, and Google, as well as partners from investment firms such as Accel Partners and Hasso Plattner Ventures. As if that wasn’t enough, a few days later back in Israel, Vardi introduced Keinan to Dell (DELL) founder and CEO Michael Dell.

For all his brokering of deals and relationships, Vardi isn’t impressed by big names and isn’t in it just for the money. “It is about building things, about having fun, about exploring new boundaries, and crossing boundaries,” says Uri Admon, CEO of an Israeli startup called Dyuna, another company in Vardi’s portfolio. “He is an inspiration to us all.”

Schenker is a BusinessWeek correspondent in Paris.


Other Jewish actors

In August 2007 the AlwaysOn Stanford Summit featured the forum “Social Networking 3.0″. The composition of the panel at this forum was very illustrative:

Moderator Charlene Li was joined by Travis Katz, senior Vice President and General Manager of MySpace International; Dustin Moskovitz, co-founder of Facebook; Richard Rosenblatt, CEO of Demand Media and former MySpace Executive; Gina Bianchini, CEO of Ning; and Karl Jacob, CEO of Wallop.

The only non-Jew in this panel was Bianchini, the rest – Katz, Moskovitz, Rosenblatt and Karl Jacob – were are all from the tribe of the “chosen people”, as they call themselves. This clearly illustrates the Jewish overrepresentation in this field. 

We will here reproduce some Jewish articles on the subject of Jews and Internet.

 

Networking meeting. From the left; Travis KatzDustin MoskovitzRichard Rosenblatt,

Gina Bianchini, Karl Jacob.

 

Richard Rosenblatt

 

 

 

 

 

Karl Jacob

 

 

 

 

 

Travis Katz

 

 

 

 

 

Dustin Moskovitz

 

 

 

 

 

The Jewish boast-page www.jewishachievement.com writes on the subject:

(Note that the passage below that Google´s Larry Page is a “non-Jew” is utter nonsense, as illustrated by quotes fromJewish sources in our section on Google.)

 

Jews as High Technology Entrepreneurs and Managers

Jews have traditionally been seen as prominent in such industries as finance, merchandising, apparel, textiles, entertainment, media, and publishing. And in most of them, Jews were true pioneers. They played leading roles as those industries emerged on the scene.

Their disproportionate importance to the contemporary world of 24/7 competitive high technology is less well known, but they have flourished there as well. It plays to their strengths. High technology demands a solid grounding in the underlying science or engineering and that typically calls for college, and sometimes a post graduate education. Demographically, Jews are better educated than their peers. An earlier chapter pointed out the high levels of Jewish enrollment at leading public and private universities.

The National Jewish Population Survey 2000-01 goes further. It points out that:

“More than half of all Jewish Adults (55%) received a college degree and a quarter (25%) earned a graduate degree.” “The Comparable figures for the total U.S. population are 29% and 6%.” As a result,

“More than 60% of all employed Jews are in one of the three highest status job categories: professional or technical (41%), management and executive (13%) and business and finance (7%).” “In contrast, 46% of all Americans work in these three high status areas, 29% in professional or technical jobs, 12% in management and executive positions and 5% in business and finance.”

Jews also tend to be disproportionately entrepreneurial, working where they will succeed or fail based on their own efforts. Andrew Grove’s decision to stop writing, and instead to pursue science, illustrates the point. Judgments about writers are often subjective while those about science are much less so. Grove wanted to work in a field where he would be judged on his own performance. He chose chemistry and got his Ph.D. After several years working with the best and brightest at Fairchild Semiconductor, he left to become one of the three founders of Intel.

Technology is a high risk meritocracy. While even the most talented people sometimes fail, and fortune can obliterate the most brilliant of plans; technology is not political. Relationships and initial funding will carry a venture only so far. Ultimately it must succeed or fail on its own merits in a volatile, highly competitive arena. Such risky opportunities can be pursued in hospitable climates, such as the United States, and in such environments, Jewish entrepreneurs have done well. They:

  • Created the world’s largest and most valuable personal computer company; (Michael Dell, Dell Computers)
  • Co-founded the world’s most successful search engine; (Sergy Brin, Google)
  • Head the world’s largest software company; (Steve Ballmer, Microsoft)
  • Co-founded and head the world’s second largest software company; (Larry Ellison, Oracle)
  • Co-founded, led and served as Chairman of the dominant microprocessor and memory chip company whose products drive most of today’s personal computers; (Andrew Grove, Intel)
  • Created the first “killer application” software which ignited demand for personal computers; (Mitch Kapor, Lotus 123)
  • Served as Number 1 or 2 person in three of the world’s four most valuable Internet companies according to a May 2004 Fortune study (Terry Semmel at Yahoo, Jeff Skoll at e-Bay and Barry Diller at IAC)
  • Co-founded and head the communications protocol/chip company whose technology is the market leader in U.S. cell phones and is likely to be the world leader as the next generation cell phone technology (3G) is adopted worldwide. (Irwin Jacobs, Qualcomm).

And that is only the barest overview:

Dell: Michael Dell and Larry Ellison (of Oracle) share the distinction of being two of the most successful college dropouts in history. (Non-Jew Bill Gates is a third.) Dell quit the University of Texas in 1985 when he was 19 years old to start Dell Computer Corporation with a $1,000 stake. His idea was to “cut out the middleman” by selling personal computers (PCs) directly to customers.

Dell’s combination of custom built computers, excellent product quality, superb customer service, outstanding production efficiency, and low prices created the world’s largest computer manufacturing company. In achieving that distinction, he took on IBM, Compaq, Hewlett Packard, Toshiba, and many other PC makers, most of them much bigger and better financed than Dell.

He is emblematic of the creative, determined nature of successful entrepreneurs. In the process, he made his company one of the most valuable in the world. In 1992, Dell became the youngest CEO in history to earn a spot on the Fortune 500 when his Company had been in existence for only eight years. With fiscal year 2005 sales of $53 billion, Dell has humbled most competitors. Despite the challenges of rapid growth and competitive success, Dell and its founder are consistently counted as among America’s most respected.

The success has earned 40 year old Dell a fortune, sufficient, till his most recent birthday, to consistently place him among Fortune’s “40 under 40.” These are all young entrepreneurs, athletes and entertainers who have achieved stellar success before reaching age 40. With his wife, Dell has created the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, endowing it with more than $1 billion. Its focus is the health, education, safety, care and development of children. Among its recent commitments was $130 million to help boost high school graduation and college attendance rates in Texas.

Google: Sergy Brin is the son of Russian Jewish emigrants who left the Soviet Union in 1979 to escape persecution. Sergy was six at the time. Mathematically inclined, he earned a computer science degree from University of Maryland before entering Stanford as a postgraduate student. There he met non-Jew, Larry Page, also studying for his doctorate. Together, they developed a search engine – called BackRub before they renamed it Google.

They dropped out of Stanford, rounded up $1 million from friends, family and angel venture investors and on September 7, 1998, launched Google. Less than ten years old, it is the most popular search engine on the Web with more than eighty-two million users each month accessing more than eight billion Web site pages (twice the comparable 2004 figure). It employs more than 4,000 people and has had a spectacular run up in its stock price to a value of roughly $80 billion in mid 2005.

Microsoft: Steve Ballmer did not found Microsoft. Non-Jews Bill Gates and Paul Allen did. They started the Company in 1976, five years after they began programming together while attending Lakeside High School in Seattle where they had access to the school’s computer. Gates went off to Harvard where he and Ballmer became good friends. Ballmer was a bright Jewish kid from Detroit who scored a perfect 800 on his math SATs and who took it upon himself to “socialize” Gates at Harvard – until Gates dropped out to start Microsoft. About the same time, Paul Allen dropped out of Washington State and together Gates and Allen launched the Company.

Gates tried to convince Ballmer to drop out as well, but instead, Ballmer stayed in school, going on to graduate magna cum laude from Harvard in 1977. He worked for Proctor and Gamble for two years and then entered Stanford Business School. Perhaps just to “fit in,” he then dropped out of Stanford Business School in 1980 after Gates had made yet one more appeal for him to join Microsoft. Ballmer was the Company’s twenty-fourth employee.

Within three years Paul Allen was gone, the result of a bout with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Ballmer served first as the Company’s financial disciplinarian and later became the number two guy, holding down every senior job in the Company before being named President in 1998 and CEO in 2000. Known for his determination and salesmanship, Ballmer has been vital to Microsoft’s success.

Oracle: Larry Ellison is a University of Chicago dropout. He was one of the three (later four) partners who founded Oracle Corporation in 1977. Ellison, the leader, read an IBM article about a new kind of software termed a “relational database.” Then commonly acknowledged as a revolutionary new way to build a database, no one, not even at IBM, thought it was commercially viable. Ellison disagreed and with $2,000, the partners began developing the software, using cash generated from consulting projects to augment the $2,000.

Of the four founders, two later left the company and one died. But from the start, it was Ellison that was, and still is, the driving force behind Oracle. “Relentless,” “determined,” and “ruthless” are among terms commonly used to describe him. He has been schooled in Japanese approaches to business where anything less than 100 percent market share is not enough.

His strong ego is characterized by the titles of two books about him. The first is titled, “The Difference Between God and Larry Ellison.” It is the first line of an old Silicon Valley joke for which the punch line is “God does not think he is Larry Ellison.” The second book is Everyone Else Must Fail, for which the preamble is “It is not good enough that I should succeed.”

Ellison was born to an unmarried Jewish teenage mother and an Italian-American air force pilot father, but he grew up with an aunt, and an uncle who constantly put young Larry down saying he would never amount to anything. Harvard Business School’s Entrepreneur of the Year in 1990, the 2004 Forbes’ 400 lists Ellison as the world’s ninth wealthiest person.

Ellison has devoted roughly half a billion dollars to charities, particularly a medical foundation focused mostly on infectious diseases in the third world and diseases of aging. In mid 2005, he also pledged $115 million to Harvard University.

Intel: As noted in the Andrew Grove bio, Intel was formed in 1968 by non-Jews Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore who recruited Grove to be their co-founder and third employee. Their established reputations and ability to raise the needed $2.5 million from venture capitalist Arthur Rock financed the Company, Noyce headed up sales and Marketing, Moore R&D, while Grove headed manufacturing and product development. Grove disciplined the organization to set and reach goals and he made the critical decisions, such committing Intel to the microprocessors which made Intel the huge success it is.

Lotus: Mitch Kapor did not invent the spreadsheet, but his software program, Lotus 123, was the first application to spawn huge demand for personal computers. Visicalc, an earlier spreadsheet program created by Jew Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston in 1982, was available on several early computers including the Apple II a few years before Lotus 123 arrived. But Lotus 123 had many more features, was easier to use, and had far better graphics. It provided the compelling reason for consumers to buy personal computers and demand was so strong, Lotus grossed $53 million in its first year and $156 million by 1984. Kapor went on to create other major software programs including Lotus Agenda.

eBay: Jeff Skoll did not create eBay, non-Jew Pierre Omidyar did in 1993. For Omidyar, born to French and Iranian parents, creating an on-line auction Web-site was a Labor Day weekend hobby project. For its first couple of years, it was simply a free Web-site Omidyar ran on his own home page along with several other of his Web page creations. During the first few months, he tried to recruit Skoll, a Jewish French-Canadian he met through friends, to become his partner. Skoll turned him down, choosing to remain at Stanford Business School.

In early 1996, Omidyar’s Internet service provider began charging him $250 a month to host the site. Omidyar was forced to start charging a fee, which he passed along to the site’s users based on the sale price of auction items. As the checks started rolling in Omidyar realized he needed help. Again, he approached Skoll. This time, after a few months of consulting for eBay, Skoll signed on as its first full time employee and President.

Skoll grew up in Canada and showed early signs of being a driven entrepreneur. At twelve, he was selling Amway products door-to-door. After graduating from the University of Toronto with a 4.0 grade point average, he set up two high tech companies before moving to Palo Alto to enroll at Stanford Business School. Compensating for Omidyar’s easy going ways and enjoyment of programming, Skoll was the driven leader who planned the business and made things happen. He hired key people, established much of the culture, and constantly pushed to build the business.

The result is the number one auction Web site in the world. It grossed $3.9 billion in 2004, netted $936 million and was worth $53 billion by mid 2005, all of which made both Omidyar and Skoll very wealthy. Skoll has since left eBay and now devotes the bulk of his time to philanthropic activities, particularly his Skoll Foundation to which he has donated $250 million. The Foundation supports social entrepreneurs working to effect lasting positive social changes worldwide. In 2003, Skoll won recognition from Business Week magazine as “one of the most innovative philanthropists of the past decade”

InterActive Corp (IAC): Barry Diller has made a career of corporate transformations. He started in the mail room at the William Morris Agency in his early 20s, and at age 24, moved to ABC-TV. Within three years, he was Vice President of Feature Films and Program Development. In that job he inaugurated ABC’s Movie of the Week, the most popular movie series in television history. At ABC Diller pioneered highly profitable “made-for-television” films which focused on social issues such as homosexuality, the Vietnam War and drugs.

In 1974, following that success (and still only 32), he was named President of Paramount Pictures. At Paramount, he oversaw creation of the hit television series: Cheers, Taxi, and Laverne and Shirley, and hit movies including: Raiders of the Lost Ark, Saturday Night Fever and Grease. Ten years later he moved to Twentieth Century-FOX where in 1985, after Rupert Murdoch took over, he launched Fox as the fourth television network. By 1990, Diller had Fox producing five nights of prime time television with such popular shows as: The Simpsons, Married With Children, Cops and America’s Most Wanted.

Diller quit Fox to purchase a stake in QVC, the cable shopping network, and from there he launched an unsuccessful bid to take over Paramount. Sumner Redstone’s Viacom beat him out. Shortly thereafter, in 1995, non-Jew John Malone recruited Diller to leave QVC, invest in and run Liberty Media’s Silver King Communications, which was broadcasting the Home Shopping Network. Diller later merged Home Shopping into Silver King.

Through a blinding series of name changes, strategic redirections and $8 billion worth of mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and investments in more than 45 companies, Diller created what is now called Interactive Corp (IAC), the fifth major Internet Company, (behind Google, Amazon, e-Bay, and Yahoo). Little known to the general public, IAC controls such prominent Internet names as: Expedia, Hotels.com, Lending Tree, Hotwire.com, Evite, Citysearch and Ticketmaster.

Over the years, Diller has served as a director of Coca Cola and the Washington Post, Trustee of New York University, member of the Executive Board for Medical Sciences at UCLA, member of the Board of Councilors of USC’s School of Cinema-Television and a member of the Board of the Museum of Television and Radio.

Yahoo: Terry Semel did not create Yahoo. Non-Jews Jerry Yang and David Filo did in 1994, as a hobby, while pursuing their electrical engineering PhD’s at Stanford. In those halcyon, “early bubble” days, Yahoo went public within two years. It was then, and still is today, regarded as one of the major Internet successes of all time, but along the way, it hit a bump in the road. In 2001, Yahoo lost $93 million on revenues of $717 million. The stock tanked and new talent was needed to avert a melt down.

That is when Terry Semel arrived. Semel had 24 years at Warner Brothers where he had been instrumental in building the Company from $1 billion to $11 billion in annual revenues. Semel quickly pushed Yahoo’s marketing, consumers’ services and acquisitions and by 2003, he had turned the company around. In 2004, Yahoo made $1.6 billion under his leadership.

Qualcomm: Irwin Jacobs is listed as one of seven Qualcomm founders, but by any measure, he has been the “essential man” from Qualcomm’s 1985 inception till now.

Qualcomm created and controls Code-Division Multiple Access (CDMA), a major wireless telecommunications technology. It is the most widely used wireless calling technology in the United States, (47 percent market share) used by such carriers as Verizon, Cingular, and Sprint. Around the world, 212 million wireless phones already utilize Qualcomm technology and as 3G, the next generation of wireless, is deployed, Qualcomm is expected to become the international market leader as well.

Jacobs grew up in New Bedford, Massachusetts. He was a mediocre musician, but an excellent student earning a bachelors degree from Cornell and a Masters and a Doctor of Science degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He taught at MIT and the University of California San Diego (UCSD) from 1959 to 1972.

While teaching, he wrote a still used college text, Principles of Communications Engineering, and in 1969, co-founded LINKABIT, a company he describes as his initial move towards becoming an “academic dropout.” That finally happened in 1972 when he became LINKABIT’s full time President and Chairman. The Company pioneered satellite TV receiver technology (VideoCipher) and was the first to commercially introduce Time Division Multiplex Access (TDMA), the predecessor technology to CDMA. Jacobs built LINKABIT to 1,400 employees, before merging it with M/A-COM and he served on that Board until 1985.

Initially, Qualcomm did research and development and some manufacturing for wireless companies while it built the largest satellite-based messaging service used by trucking companies to manage their fleets. That service was quickly overshadowed, however, by CDMA. By 2004, CDMA was generating over $5 billion in annual revenues.

All of this has made Jacobs (and his fellow founders) quite wealthy. Jacobs has responded with major philanthropy. He and his wife have given $110 million to the San Diego Symphony (hearkening back to his days as a mediocre musician), another $110 million went to the UCSD to “support the other faculty that are currently doing the teaching,” $7 million went to the Salk Institute, and millions more has gone to support the San Diego Food Bank and historic New Bedford. Both he, and fellow Qualcomm founder Andrew Viterbi now have schools of engineering named after them, Jacobs at UCSD and Viterbi and the University of Southern California.

RealNetworks: Ron Glaser takes credit for creating the first technology to “stream” audio, video, and other digital content, such as music and games, to computers. He founded RealNetworks in 1994 to capitalize on the technology.

Fresh out of Yale with degrees in economics and computer sciences, Glaser joined Microsoft in 1983 where he rose, over his ten years there, to become Vice President of Multimedia and Consumer Systems. He left Microsoft in 1994 and shortly thereafter, says he downloaded Mosaic, an early version of the Netscape Internet browser. He immediately saw the potential to augment the browser with “streaming.” He founded RealNetworks and was soon able to take it public. It became a hot Internet stock and, for a time, Glaser was a billionaire.

Today, following the bursting of the Internet bubble and heightened competition with Microsoft’s Media Player and Apple’s Quicktime, RealNetworks continues to post operating losses and it is taking on Microsoft in court. Like earlier Federal and state lawsuits against Microsoft, Glaser’s company claims Microsoft competes unfairly by bundling its Mediaplayer into its software. Win or lose, RealNetworks has sufficient cash to finance itself for some time and thus remain a major Internet force, particularly as the downloading of music and games becomes ever more prolific. If RealNetworks succeeds, Glaser will rejoin the ranks of billionaires who hit it big with their Internet technology innovations.

Broadcast.com & HDNet: Mark Cuban grew up poor, the son of Russian Jewish emigrants in blue collar Pittsburgh. He was a bright student who was also considered something of a hustler with his native selling ability (selling garbage bags, greeting cards and magazines, all door-to-door, from the time he was 12.) At the University of Indiana he started a chain letter and gave disco dancing lessons to pay for school.

After graduating in 1983 he started a computer consulting firm, MicroSolutions, though he neither owned, nor knew much about, computers. Self-taught by having to learn to perform on the promises he made to customers, he built the Company to revenues of $30 million a year before selling it to Compuserve. He made himself wealthy in the process.

He then “kicked back” for a few years, before returning in 1995, with partner Todd R. Wagner (not Jewish), to create Broadcast.com. It pioneered radio and television broadcasting over the Internet. Cuban and Wagner soon took it public and, in 1999, sold it to Yahoo for $5.7 billion. Cuban and Wagner were billionaires.

His attention then shifted to his ownership of the Dallas Mavericks basketball team. Cuban is a brash, avid, courtside presence whose outbursts have cost him an estimated $1 million in fines. At the same time, his savvy marketing and recruiting of top talent has converted the Mavericks from a perennial loser to a contender.

Cuban also launched HDNet, a high definition television broadcast network available on satellite, cable, and selected over the air high definition broadcast stations. He and Wagner also purchased Landmark theaters, a large U.S. chain of “art-house” movie theaters which will air the high definition movies he is producing and the films he has contracted six major studios to convert from film to digital.

Measures of entrepreneurial success

One measure of entrepreneurial success is provided by the Fortune “40 Under 40″ annual list of the wealthiest young Americans, nearly all of them self made. Though entrepreneurial success is not simply about wealth, it is one scorecard. The Fortune’s 2004 list is included as Exhibit 16a. While it includes thirteen athletes and entertainers, the remaining twenty-seven are successful young entrepreneurs, mostly from high technology companies they started or led. Of the twenty-seven, at least six are Jewish. Three of them are among the top five and five of them among the top ten. In order, the six include: #1 Michael Dell, #3 Jeff Skoll, #5 Sergey Brin, #9 Dan Snyder, #10, Marc Benioff, and #17 Jerry Greenberg. Statistically, at two percent of the U.S. population, Jews would be lucky if even one of the twenty-seven was Jewish. At 22 percent, the result is ten times what one would expect.

The Forbes 400 corroborates the Fortune list. (Exhibit 16b) Of the year 2004 ranking, at least 25 percent of the “400″ are Jewish. And like the Fortune “40 Under 40,” many of them made their wealth as entrepreneurs who started successful businesses. Prominent among the first twenty-five are #9 Michael Dell, #10 Lawrence Ellison, and #11 Steven Balmer. As with the Fortune 40, the performance defies expectations. We would expect perhaps eight Jews among the 400, the actual figure (at least 102) is twelve times that.

And another Jewish article, this time from http://emergentobserver.blogspot.com/2009/03/omg-jewish-history-of-internet.html:

OMG, A Jewish History of the Internet

Did you know that the internet is Jewish? Yeah…Moses got the Torah from HaShem on Mt. Sinai and HaShem told Moses that his brother Aaron and his descendants would be Kohenim forever. Now a “Kohen” is a priest and the story of the internet involves a Jewish priest, a Jewish painter, a Jewish Scotsman and a Jewish sugar merchant living high in the mountains…well sort of…

In 1972, at the International Computer Communication Conference, Robert Kahn (a kohen) was able to connect 40 different computers revealing his work to the public for the first time. Just three years later David Farber (whose Yiddish family name means “painter”) worked to create a primitive kind of email system. Within the next twenty years the internet that we now know and love was born. In 2003 MySpace was launched and by 2006 it had become the largest social networking site in the United States. MySpace added a new dimension to how we communicate and share information with our friends, family and even religious communities. The website was co-founded by Tom Anderson. Although Tom’s last name reflects his father’s Scottish heritage, he and his mother are Jewish and he was raised in a messianic Jewish household. At the age of 14 Tom was a computer hacker working his mischief under the tag name Lord Flathead (not a Jewish name). He lead a team of hackers that were able to brake in to Chase Manhattan Bank computers, he tampered with banking records and left a message saying that unless he was given free use of the system he would wipeout the records. He must have been praying because he was never charged with the crime :) The website Tom would later become famous for inspired a 23-year-old Mark Zuckerberg (a Jewish name meaning “sugar mountain”) to create another social networking site called Facebook. Things are looking sweeter then a pile of sugar for Zuckerberg because Facebook has made him over a billion dollars and more people can be found on his networking site then in the entire country of Japan.

…So we see that many key players in the field of computer technologies are our fellow tribesmen. The internet itself has even been compared to the Talmud…layers upon layers of commentary dealing with issues from personal hygiene to oven construction. However the internet is only truly comparable to the Talmud if it’s dialogue eventually returns to G-dly matters. The Talmud finds a way to elevate even mundane and seemingly secular matters to a level of Torah. We should do the same with our technologies, only then do they become truly Jewish.

And finally yet another Jewish boasting article on the same topic (from http://kupe.joeuser.com/article/158970/Jews_On_The_Internet): 

 

Jews On The Internet

By Larry Kuperman

July 29, 2007  

The question of how many Jews there are begs the definition of “What is a Jew?” and also “Who is a Jew?” Questions that have been asked many a time…..mostly by other Jews. Being a Secular Jew myself, I like the most liberal, inclusive definition that includes….well ME. The biggest number that you will see is about 18 million Jews. This works out to something like 1/4 of one per cent of the world’s population. So you would expect that our impact on the Internet would be proportional to our numbers.

Not so, bubbala. (A term of endearment, darling. Can you feel me virtually pinching your cheek? In a nice way.) The impact of Jews far outweighs their numbers. Lets look at “Who’s A Yid?”

Larry Page and Sergey Brin, founders of Google. Larry Page’s mom, Gloria Page, is Jewish. Sergey Brin was born in Moscow, Russia, to Jewish parents, Michael and Eugenia, who fled to America for religious freedom.

Facebook was founded by Mark Zuckerberg, while he was a student at Harvard University. It was originally going to be limited to Harvard students, but expanded quickly. Zuckerberg saw the potential in the site and sought capital. He turned to Peter Thiel, a co-founder of Paypal and, not-so-coincidentally, also Jewish. Facebook is often rumored to be up for sale. How much is Facebook worth? Let me refer that to Mr. Thiel: “Facebook’s internal valuation is around $8 billion based on their projected revenues of $1 billion by 2015.” Founder Mark Zuckerberg is 23, or as we like to say, 10 years past his Bar Mitzvah.

Robert Kevin Rose is, comparatively, an old man at age 30. He is best known for founding Digg.com. Robert lost his job during the burst of the Dot Com bubble, ended up working as a production assistant on the show The Screen Savers He began appearing on air and stepped in as host after Leo Laporte left TechTV. On November 1, 2004, he started a site that combined social bookmarking, blogging, RSS into arguably the premier tech news site. Today Digg is rated among the 100 most popular sites on the web.

Scott Blum has been referred to as the “Sam Walton of e-commerce.” Leaving a successful career as a shoe salesman as a youth, he founded Microbanks, a company that sold add-on memory modules for Macintosh computers. Before his 21st birthday, he sold Microbanks to Sentron Technology in San Diego for $2.5 million in cash. He would then co-found Pinnacle Micro with his father. Leaving there under a cloud of dubious accounting practices (he paid no penalty and admitted no guilt) he would go on to found Buy.com. He left before went public, returned to take it back private and it is now his baby.

RealNetworks is not the most beloved company in the world, nor is Real Player a favorite product. But there is no question that CEO and Founder Rob Glaser has been influential. When he founded Real Networks in 1994, at age 31, he was already a millionaire from his days at Microsoft. He has had a major impact on the Internet.

Certainly also worth mentioning are Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, whose mother is Jewish; Larry Ellison, founder of Oracle, who was born on the Lower East Side of New York to a Jewish mother and raised by his great-aunt and great-uncle in Chicago; and Phillipe Kahn, founder of Borland.

What would the Internet be like with Google, PayPal, Facebook, Digg.com, Buy.com? It would be very, very different. 

***

 

 Radio Islam har förstås också snott denna sidan:

radioislam.org/islam/english/jewishp/internet/jews_behind_internet.htm

 

 

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Muslimskt kärnvapenhot mot Israel, Europa och USA.

Iran

Vilket i svenska blaskor och vänsterbloggar enbart blir “Israel hotar Iran” självklart. Jag antar att ryssarna vande sig vid Pravda också så att de läste ut fakta med ett inbyggt filter. Med skillnaden att i dagens uppkopplade värld kan inte TT hålla verkligheten hemlig lika lätt, även om det vore deras våta dröm.

Euronews rapporterar vad de vet om IAEA:s nya rapport om Iran. Tidigare rapporter har huvudsakligen handlat om Irans framtagande av råvaran, den nya rapporten ska handla mer om deras desperata försök att omvandla det till kärnvapen. Information finns om var komponenter för kärnvapen har testats, material har flyttats, men finns där några data som skulle kunna påverka Rysslands och Kinas inställning? 

Frågan är vad som skulle vara triggern för en attack från Israel. Måste en raket först vara på väg från Iran till Tel Aviv? Israel har förstås god bevakning at Iran, via högupplösta kameror i satelliter som kan lösa upp en halv meter stora föremål på marken, och de samarbetar med Azerbaijan så de har drönare där. Även sådana som kan släppa vapen utvecklas där. De har ett starkt anti-missilskydd.

Israel testar sin långdistansraket Jericho III, med gott resultat. 

Iranierna har lovat ett “gatukrig i Tel Aviv” om de attackeras av någon. Och de lovar att sprida kriget till Europa och USA. Räkna ut hur många sympatetiserande muslimer vi har i Europa. Att attackera Israel direkt från Iran – USA har ju vänner på vägen, även om de är mer eller mindre tillförlitliga. Och Gulfstater och Saudierna står närmare Israel än Iran! Saudierna har klagat mycket på Irans reaktorexperiment i Bushehr, speciellt efter olyckorna i Japan. Kollar du kartan ser du att det inte alls är långt från Bushehr till SaudiArabien. 

Som jag skrev i början av året, var iranierna nära en ordentlig explosion i Bushehr på grund av sin otålighet, innan ryssarna stoppade dem i sista sekunden.

Iran har börjat gömma sitt kärnmaterial där de tror att ingen kan hitta det.

Israel har sitt allvarliga problem med - sin moral! Minns hur den engelska specialisten på stadskrigföring, överste Kemp, för FN intygade att Israel genomförde den mest “humanitära” krigföringen som var tekniskt möjlig i Gaza. Samma problem kommer att uppstå om de tvingas attackera Iran – de kommer inte att bara släppa en mastig bomb över Teheran.

Pakistan

Om du kollar kartan ligger Pakistan precis bakom Iran sett från Israels vinkel, och har gemensam gräns, och Pakistan har tagit fram kärnvapen för länge sedan. 

Pakistan har fått såna enorma summor från USA att deras kärnvapeninnehåll har dubblats på ett par år. Normala människor är rädda att talibaner får tag på några, men de själva är mer rädda för att USA ska göra det :)  De säger till USA att de förvarar leksakerna säkert, och skiljer på stridsspetsar, kärnmaterial etc., men de vill inte att USA har riktig koll på var de har sina vapen, medan USA inte vill att alla pakistanska taliban-sympatetisörer gör det. Komponenterna transporteras från plats till plats, ibland i gamla brödbilar i den vilda trafiken där, så de inte kan spåras. 

 Syrien

 IAEA var där en gång på ett snabbt besök vid den nordkoreanska reaktorn som Israel sprängde – men förbjöds att se 3-4 andra misstänkta platser, och sedan det enda besöket har de inte fått återvända trots krav. Men Syrien har väl annat att tänka på nu, när Assad har skjutit ner – vad är det – 3500 syrier........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/frankrike-ar-emot-attack-mot-iran

 http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=284373

 http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=284434

 http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/fn-rapport-stark-oro-for-iranska-karnvapen

 http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/iran-vi-behover-inga-karnvapen

 http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=284435

http://arbetarbladet.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079791-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

 http://dagbladet.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079346-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

http://arbetarbladet.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079359-frankrike-ar-emot-attack-mot-iran 

 http://st.nu/start/utrikes/1.4079344-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran 

 http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/militarstrateg-anfall-mot-iran-inte-omojligt

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article13906317.ab

 http://ekuriren.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.1247233-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

  http://www.svd.se/nyheter/utrikes/iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran_6617932.svd

 

http://www.svd.se/nyheter/utrikes/oenigt-i-sakerhetsradet-om-palestina_6620034.svd

 

http://www.svd.se/nyheter/utrikes/iran-vill-inte-kompromissa_6621144.svd

 http://gd.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079793-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

 http://gd.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079360-frankrike-ar-emot-attack-mot-iran

http://ltz.se/nyheter/utrikes/1.4079343-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

http://hd.se/utrikes/2011/11/08/frankrike-ar-emot-attack-mot-iran/

 http://www.gp.se/nyheter/varlden/1.769095-iaea-atomvapenforsok-i-iran

 http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/1.2616457/fn-hemliga-experiment-med-karnvapen-i-iran

http://svt.se/2.22584/1.2596199/iaea_misstanker_iran_for_karnvapenexperiment

 http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/fn-rapport-stark-oro-for-iranska-karnvapen

 

 

 

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Återbesök på de ockuperade områdena: läran om försvarbara gränser

De ockuperade områdena åter besökta: läran om försvarbara gränser

Av Harry Kanigel   2 jan 2011

[En del bilder syns bättre i originalartikeln]

Det är ett mysterium – eller hur? En en liten stat på några miljoner flitiga själar ses som gubbiga, hånfulla imperialistiska översittare. Nog måste det finnas en historia bakom en sådan kognitiv förvirring. Varför skulle vi ifrågasätta det moraliska hos en nation som behåller territorium av högt militärt värde som vunnits i ett försvarskrig?

I grunden ses Israel av sina fiender som en fläck på det regionala kalifatet och en reva i vävnaden av pan-arabism. Denna uppfattning konstaterades enkelt och tydligt under upptakten till 1967 års sexdagarskrig då Iraks president Abdel-Rahman Aref sa i en radiointervju “Israels existens är ett fel som måste rättas till.” Med uppfriskande direkthet för en statschef tillade han “Det här är vår möjlighet att utplåna den vanära som har varit med oss sedan 1948. Vårt mål är tydligt – att utplåna Israel från kartan.”

Sannolikheten för en förhandlad fred är försvinnande liten med tanke på den filosofiska förankringen för Israels grannar, de kommer bara att söka vinna tid, eftersom de manövrerar för att eliminera fläcken, det “fel som måste rättas till.” Belysande är att den islamiska principen hudna, för vapenvila, förstås som en vapenvila som bibehålls tills maktbalansen förändras. Ett närbesläktat begrepp är taqiyya, vilket är praxis för bedrägeri och legitimerat av Koranen för att avancera islam geopolitiskt.

Det följer då att de arabiska strategerna omformulerade sina närmanden till förstörelsen av Israel efter deras nederlag i sexdagarskriget. De har i årtionden nu fört en ekonomisk, diplomatisk och propagandamässig kampanj vars syfte är att isolera Israel och krympa henne till oförsvarbar storlek och konfiguration. En viktig del i denna strategi är vägran att absorbera arabiska flyktingar i arabländerna att föreviga bilden av det hemlösa, belägrade palestinska folket. En tidig förespråkare för denna omformulering av tillvägagångssättet var Mohamed Haikal, då redaktör för den halvofficiella egyptiska tidningen Al Ahram, som år 1971 uttalade att “det totala tillbakadragande [från de omstridda territorierna]” skulle “döma hela staten Israel.”

Infför detta existentiella hot måste Israel vara stadigare i sin vacklande anslutning till läran om försvarbara gränser, en ärevördig princip i internationell rätt daterad till Westfaliska freden 1648. Som en följd av Osloavtalet från 1993 verkade den tidigare krigaren och Israels premiärminister Yitzhak Rabin för att avsluta doktrinen om försvarbara gränser i en donquijotisk strävan efter fred med livslång terrorism och framtida Nobels fredspris tillsammans med Yassir Arafat. Rabin syftade till att klargöra sin ståndpunkt 1995 när han talade till Knesset i oktober och sade “Gränserna för staten Israel, under permanent lösning, kommer att gå längre än de linjer som fanns innan sexdagarskriget. Vi kommer inte att återvända till den 4 juni 1967 års stilleståndslinjer. ” Detta blidkade inte de missnöjda israeliska medborgarna som mördade honom två månader senare, uppenbarligen en reaktion på Oslo.

Läran om försvarbara gränser bekräftades förra året av nuvarande PM Benjamin Netanyahu, som  har en begränsad rörelsefrihet bunden till Israels roll som  ”ockupationsmakt”. Israels andra utmaning är att se till att gränserna är militärt försvarbra av egen styrka, så mycket som möjligt. Dess säkerhet kan inte vara beroende av tillfälliga politiska förhållanden i USA eller de arabiska staterna, vars öppna fientlighet mot Israel vaxer och avtar men vars invanda engagemang för dess förstörelse närapå är en naturlag.

Förspel

1947 års delningsplan från FN för det brittiska mandatet Palestina kombinerde Gaza, Västbanken och en region i södra Libanon för att bilda den nya föreslagna arabiska staten, intimt sammanflätad med Israel. Baserat på försäkringar om att judarna skulle elimineras, följde de palestinska araberna de omgivande arabiska länderna och avslog partitionsförslaget. Den palestinska befolkningen bestod då av inhemska araber och en stor tillströmning av nya invandrare. Vissa av dessa nyanlända var syrianer, främst från Hauranregionen, som hade lockats av den ekonomiska utvecklingen som hade skett inom Mandatet. Andra hade uppmuntrats av arabstaterna att bosätta sig i Palestina uttryckligen för att stärka arabiska krav på den israeliska statsbildningen. Denna tillströmning av invandrare skulle senare leda till att den arabiska flyktingströmmen till de palestinska flyktinglägretväsentligt ökade. Direkt efter ett möte hos Arabförbundet i Kairo i december 1947 bildade de arabiska nationerna en gemensam arabisk styrka, den arabiska befrielsearmén, som lanserade en rad militära kampanjer mot sionisterna för att omintetgöra ellerbromsa den israeliska staten. En andra fas av kriget inleddes när statsbildningen deklarerades ungefär fem månader senare.

Gaza

Den olyckliga historien om Gazaremsan illustrerar flera punkter av central betydelse för läran om försvarbara gränser.

Under en offensiv maj 1948 som syftade till att erövra Tel Aviv avancerade egyptiska styrkor norrut längs Medelhavskusten, erövrade Gaza. Egyptiska styrkor marscherade norrut men stoppades av israeliska styrkor. På kort tid hade eldupphörlinjer inrättades av FN i enlighet med var trupperna då befann sig på alla stridsområden.

Det fanns ingen formell överenskommelse om internationella gränser. Trycket från Storbritannien, Frankrike, USA och FN var tillräckligt för att få striderna att stoppa, men vapenstilleståndsavtalet var tydligt med att den “gröna” linjer inte var några permanenta gränser. Så, när musiken stannade, kontrollerade Egypten Gazaremsan, som hölls nästan oavbrutet tills de besegrades arton år senare i sexdagarskriget. Gaza var i limbo under denna period eftersom egyptiskt medborgarskap inte erbjöds invånarna och inte heller fanns det något tal om en palestinsk stat.

Enligt internationell rättspraxis var den egyptiska ockupationen olaglig, eftersom den kom från ett angreppskrig i strid mot en FN-resolution. Det följer av principerna för internationell rätt att när Gaza intogs av Israel i ett försvarskrig i 1967 gjorde dess tidigare illegala status att Israels kontroll var laglig. Egypten avvisade erbjudande att köpa tillbaka Gaza och absorbera dess befolkning 1979 då ett fredsavtal uppgjordes med Israel vavidi Egypten återfick Sinaihalvön. Vid denna punkt i historien fanns det inga nationella fordringar, andra än Israels, på Gazas territorium.

De springande principerna i internationell rätt markeras mycket tydligt i en 1970 essä av Stephen Schwebel som senare skulle bli ordförande i Internationella domstolen i Haag. Uppsatsen, som publicerades i American Journal of International Law, identifierar först ett axiom:

En stat som lagligen utövar sin rätt till självförsvar kan beslagta och ockupera främmande territorium så länge som sådana beslag och ockupation är nödvändiga för dess självförsvar.

Och sedan skjuter han in på kärnan i frågan:

Om den tidigare innehavaren av territoriet har erövrat detta territorium olagligt har staten som därefter tar detta område i sitt lagligen utövade självförsvar, jämfört med tidigare innehavare, bättre titel.

Bättre titel. Det är ett faktum att, med undantag av Sinaihalvön, vart och ett av de områden som vanns av Israel under 1967 års sexdagarskrig – på Västbanken, Gazaremsan och delar av Golanhöjderna – beslagtogs olagligt av deras tidigare ockupanter, Jordanien, Egypten och Syrien respektive.

En kort utvikning om Sinai: Den militära och diplomatiska parera-och dragkraft i denna öken regionen visar principen för försvarbara gränser som har erkänts av FN: s resolution 242 som följde från Sexdagarskriget. I resolutionen inte mandat att Israel drar sig tillbaka till före kriget Eldupphörlinjerna, utan snarare att den var skyldig att utträda ur “områden” (och, helt avsiktligt, inte “alla” områden och inte “de” områden) till “säkra och erkända gränser . ” Dessa gränser skulle säkert vara annorlunda än den sårbara Eldupphörlinjerna som Israel hade blivit attackerad. Om Israel hade fogats Sinai, skulle det ha varit utan tvekan överensstämmer med resolution 242:

Sinai hade varit en mellanstation område för en massiv bepansrade kraft, varav 900 stridsvagnar, i upptakten till sexdagarskriget. För att underlätta denna mobilisering, hade Egypten utvisade FN Emergency Forces (UNEF) från Sinai. Uppbyggnaden i Sinai stödde blockader av Suezkanalen och Tiransundet, och hotade den israeliska hamnen i Eilat. I efterdyningarna av sexdagarskriget gjorde Israel strategisk defensiv användning av de tagna Sinai för att säkra dess södra gräns. Det inrättades en sofistikerad tidig varning anläggning vid Umm Khashiba i centrala Sinai. Naturligtvis var ett stort svep av öken befriad från en fientlig militär närvaro. Israel haft, för enda gången i sin historia, ett visst mått av vad som kallas “strategiskt djup”, vilket motsvarar ungefär med rimliga förväntningar att “leva för att bekämpa en annan dag” när överraskad av en kraftfull första attacken. Visst, vis-à-vis Egypten, Israel hade nu “försvarbara gränser.”

1979 års fredsavtal mellan Israel och Egypten, vilket innebar återlämnande av Sinai – en “fred för land” gambit, tog en ny modell för att ersätta “säkerhetsarrangemangen” för försvarbara gränser. Sådana säkerhetsarrangemang har möjliggjorts genom utmärkande egenskaper, egyptisk-israeliska fronten, särskilt den låga befolkningstätheten i Sinai och dess vidder med fri utsikt. Dessa villkor gör det möjligt att genomföra vissa bestämmelser i fördraget, av en oberoende, icke-FN-organ. I stilren landskap, långt ifrån allt, var det möjligt att övervaka de krafter (dvs hur många soldater, vilken typ av vapen, militär eller civil polis) som tillhör varje sida, i flera olika angränsande områden. Men någon sådan gynnade uppsättning av topografiska och demografiska förhållanden existerar på Västbanken, Golanhöjderna eller Gaza.

För att understryka den inneboende mjukhet en fred som är beroende av tillfälliga politiska förhållanden måste det noteras att Egypten har fått allt mer massiv infusioner av amerikanska pengar varje år sedan 1979-fördraget, som kan förväntas att uppmuntra efterlevnad, men inte nödvändigtvis djupt lösa. Dessutom förlitar sig på en verkställighet enhet, skapar MFO (Multinational Force och observatörer) en bräcklig beroende på en stadig uppdrag för en sådan organisation, trots en föränderlig rollistan. Slutligen var de säkerhetsarrangemang som faktiskt genomfört en blek version av vad som var tänkt som israeler som kämpar denna skola, mest besviken var Umm Khashiba tidig varning station avvecklas.

I alla fall är Gaza, med sin tätt packade stadsområden och läge nära israeliska befolkningscentra Ashkelon och Ashdod, inte som Sinai. Den nuvarande inkarnationen av Gaza dödläge beror Israel augusti i 2005 års tillbakadragande från denna 140 kvadratkilometer territorium som löper längs 25 miles av Medelhavskusten. Tillbakadragandet hade införts i december ’03 med höga förhoppningar, död Arafat och uppstigandet av hans efterträdare Mahmud Abbas palestinska ledarskapet verkade signal nya möjligheter i palestinsk-israeliska relationerna.

Tillbakadragandet, som förlängas till fem bosättningar på Västbanken, lades fram ensidigt (och av premiärministerns kansli fiat) av israelerna, och inte som en produkt av ett framförhandlat avtal med den palestinska myndigheten. Though Abbas godkänt initiativet, med earnest försäkringar om fredliga avsikter vid 2005 Sharm el-Sheikh toppmötet fanns det ingen quid pro quo erbjuds Israel i utbyte mot sin eftergifter, som tycktes flöda från den andra intifadan våld. Enligt Gaza bestämmelserna i planen, var 21 civila bosättningar planat var alla säkerhetsstyrkor bort och mer än åtta tusen judar, de flesta infödda Gazabor, fördrevs. Synagogor stående som utsetts heliga platser, men var snabbt och entusiastiskt destrueras av sin nya ordningsvakter. Byggen som var mer nyttoinriktade, såsom skolor och varma hus, var också föremål för imponerande förstörelse.

Avvecklingen gick mycket längre än DOP (principförklaringen) av Osloavtalet, som hade bekräftat Israels ansvar för sina medborgares säkerhet inom de omstridda territorierna och vid gränsövergångar. Som ett perfekt anpassat svar på svagheten med tillbakadragandet avfyrades hundratals Kassamraketer och granater från det nyligen överlämnade Gaza in i israeliska städer och byar, framför allt Sderot, en gång en livlig arbetarstad som har försvagats av ständiga bombardemang.

Innan tillbakadragandet var vapensmuggling in i Gaza ett stort problem, massor av vapen hade strömmat in i Gaza från iranska fraktfartyg, från Syrien, och från Saudiarabien. Men Israels missriktade försök att blidka terroristerna var omvälvande. Sedan tillbakadragandet har Iran övervakat ett sofistikerat nätverk med vapensmuggling som organiseras av dess revolutionära garde. Vapen passerar genom Somalia, Sudan, Röda havet och Nilen till beduinstammar i Sinai och slutligen – dess passage understöds av korrupta småsinta tjänstemän – genom systemet av tunnlar vid Rafah-gränserna till Gaza som är en kanal för allt från självmordsbälten till långdistansraketer.

I juni 2007 militariserades Gaza ytterligare när Hamas vann en majoritet i det allmänna palestinska valet i januari ’06 samt tog kontroll över Gaza från rivalerna Fatah. Det verkar som om Hamas skördade vinsten av att ha försvarat terror i motsats till Fatah som låtsas vara mer moderat, och tog åt sig äran att ha kört bort judarna.

Israels djävulskt svåra säkerhetsutmaningar är som hämtade från de mest svårbegripliga teorierna inom spelteorin. Att begränsa flödet av vapen och vapen-material in i Gaza skulle vara besvärligt nog, med tanke på tunnlar, den kalla freden med Egypten, och den världsomspännande propagandapressen som utövas på hamnblockaden. Blockaden har framträtt som en skandalhistoria bland de som kallar sig själva människorättsaktivister, som inteprecis  är exempel av rigorös objektivitet när väljer sina fajter.

Den politiska smeten med blockaden åskådliggjordes av den senaste tidens flottiljepisod där Israels lagliga rättigheter i havet trotsades av en liten armada med en besättning av provokatörer. Den politiska propagandan var en skapelse av Greta Berlin, och skicklig jonglering av media av sådana grupper som International Solidarity Movement och Free Gaza. Som episod utvecklade sig försökte israeliska flottans attacksoldater ta sig ombord på ett av fartygen, nedhissade i en enda lina förbunden med en helikopter ovanför, och attackerades när de närmade sig däcket av av “fredsaktivister” som svingade järnrör på det turkiskregistrerade Mavi Marmara. Det var en uppvisning av jihadist-teater, där blockadbrytare var utrustade med slangbellor och stålrör, som attackerade professionellt utbildade kommandosoldater med sofistikerade vapen. Åtta aktivister uppnådde martyrskap, ett “lyckligt slut” för att citera en passagerare / jihad som fångades på video de dagar som föregick den slutliga konfrontationen med israelisk militär. Blockadutmanarna som gick fruktansvärt rätt resulterade i en förödande förlust av ansikte för Israel och en försvagning av blockadens villkor.

Flottiljen var en episod som Israel nästan säkert skulle kunnat ha lyckats med mer finess, men som huvudsakligen förde fram den särskilda moraliska standard som tillämpas på den judiska staten. Världsomfattande låg fattningsförmåga angående en blockads legitima säkerhetsintressen har skickligt upprätthållits av Israels motståndare som fantiserat om hennes påstådda moraliska brister och antagit Gazaborna som förtryckta maskotar.

Mer olycksbådande är inbäddningen av Hamas ledning och vapenfabriker i civila bostadshus i Gaza. Hamasmedlemmar, däribland de med hög profil vandrar bland butiksinnehavare, textilarbetare, souvenirhantverkare och skolbarn som utmärkta mänskliga sköldar. Det bör noteras också att terminalpunkterna i Rafahs vapensmugglingstunnlar ofta är i privata hem. Det är klart att dödsfall bland icke-stridande är det oundvikliga resultatet av en sådan blandad användning av resurser, ett propagandatrick.

Och så har Israel fått backa in i absurda spelregler som krävde placering av varnande telefonsamtal för att varna boende, både stridande och icke-stridande inför attack på på vapenfabriker och lager. Dessa anfall ledde förstås till förstörelse av  palestinska hem, en annan propagandakupp för Israels fiender. Och israeliska soldater var i stor fara  knackade dörr hos kända terroristgäng för att befria civila som ofta är omöjliga att skilja från stridande. Det är en vansinnig situation som kräver en akrobat att jonglera rätt.

“Västbanken”

På samma sätt som i Gaza skapades de provisoriska gränserna som en ögonblicksbild av var armeerna stod vid vapenstilleståndet 1949, den “gröna linjen” på militärkartor som avgränsar vissa områden på den västra stranden av floden Jordan, då Israels självständighetskrig höggs av. När vapenstilleståndet undertecknades kontrollerades Västbanksområdet av jordanska styrkor.

Enligt villkoren i 1947 FN delningsresolutionen skulle vissa delar av territoriet faktiskt ha hamnat inom staten Israel, särskilt Kfar Etzion, ett länge bevarat judisk jordbruksområde, och Gamla Stan i Jerusalem, med judendomens förstörda tempel som definierade dess heligaste plats.

Ändå hade den stora massan av detta territorium föreslagits som en del av en arabisk stat i 1947 års FN-partition. Planen hder avvisats av de arabiska nationerna, inklusive Egypten, Irak, Syrien, Libanon och Jordanien, som alla attackerade Israel inom 24 timmar efter utropandet av självständighet. Efter dammet hade satt sig vågade Jordanien att annektera marken som kallats “Västbanken” och utvidga medborgarskap till dess invånare. Denna manöver togs inte väl emot av det internationella samfundet som med undantag för Storbritannien (och eventuellt Pakistan), inte erkände annekteringen – även om den lokala (dvs, den palestinska) befolkningen inte hade några invändningar mot att bli jordanier.

Särskilt hårt var motståndet från Arabförbundet, som skarpsinnigt insåg att om Västbankens befolkning absorberades till Jordanien skulle det skapa ett prejudikat för assimilering av de arabiska flyktingarna i andra arabländer. Om det utvidgades till Israel, skulle en sådan politik leda till ett utbyte av judiska och arabiska flyktingar, som var ungefär lika många, och omintetgöra historien om palestinierna som belägrade statslösa personer. I sinom tid avstod Jordanien från sina territoriella anspråk och drog tillbaka jordanskt medborgarskap från Västbanken. Den arabiska blocket hade nu fått sin story mera direkt: Västbankens invånare var statslösa flyktingar, offer för de sionistiska översittarna. Mycket bättre det än att absorbera dem i Jordanien (som var och är etniskt palestinsky) som arabiska bröder.

Annekteringen avvisades också, med mindre machiavellisk indirekthet, av det större internationella samfundet, som såg det som ett enkelt brott mot folkrätten eftersom Jordanien hade erövrat landet i ett angreppskrig.

Det råkar vara så att det sista rättsligt bindande instrument som upprättats om gränser som omger Västbanken var Nationernas Förbunds mandat från 1922, ett bland ett virrvarr av avtal som eliminerade det Ottomanska Riket efter Första Världskriget. Detta dokument ger explicit rätten till judisk bosättning på all mark som utsetts som “Palestina, som tidigare tillhörde det turkiska riket.” Jordanien (som heter Trans-Jordanien) höggs bort från området öster om floden Jordan, av just samma dokument, vilket tyder på en tanke om symmetri, judar och araber i var sitt område.

För att glömma det framtida käbblet, Mandatet anger att Palestina, vilket inkluderade 100% av “Västbanken” markerades för det uttryckliga syftet att skapa ett “nationellt hem för det judiska folket.” Bestämmelserna i mandatet ärvdes av NF:s  efterträdare, FN. Trots detta föreslog FN en ny arabisk stat som skulle omfatta Västbanken, i sin delningsplan för Palestina.

För att vara säker, hade de flesta judar  schasats bort från Västbanken, känd i Skriften som Judéen och Samarien, decennier innan fientligheterna 1947-9, främst som en följd av pogromer, så territoriet hade, vid den tidpunkt då “gröna linjerna” sattes upp, i huvudsak arabisk befolkning. Naturligtvis är både Judeen (söder om Jerusalem) och Samarien (i norr) centrala i judarnas historia efter deras framväxt som nation för mer än tre tusen år sedan. Varje område är hem för heliga gravplatser med de judiska patriarkerna som är bland de heligaste platserna inom judendomen.

I varje fall kastades alla dessa petitesser bort när Jordanien anslöt sig till det arabiska försöket att i sin linda kväva den framväxande judiska staten. Under arton år av jordansk ockupation utgjorde Västbankens område inkörsport  för många attacker av “Fedayeen”-terrorister mot israeliska civila. Fedayeen (“män av offer”) var främst rekryterade, utbildade och utrustade av egyptiskaunderrättelsetjänsten, men attackerna iscensattes oftast från baser i Jordanien på grund av närheten till befolkningscentra i Israel.

Principen om försvarbara gränser, tillämpad på Västbanken, bygger på grundläggande arbete av Yigal Allon, anrik infödd son i det judiska Palestina som planerade underjordiska kommandoenheter under det moderna Israels förhistoria, klev fram som en befälhavare under frihetskriget och blev statsman i olika höga positioner inklusive arbetskrafts- och utrikesminister. Allon var medlem i det “inre kabinettet” under sexdagarskriget under en politiskt försvagad premiärminister, Levi Eshkol, som han skulle efterträda två år senare, tjänstgör kort som tillförordnad PM efter Eshkol död. En strategisk visionär, var Allon arkitekten bakommallen för Israels försvarbara gränser, dubbad Allon-planen, som fortfarande är anmärkningsvärt relevant nästan fyrtio år efter sin formulering och trettio år efter Yigal Allons död vid 61.

Allon-planen försökte lösa Israels strategiska svagheter som berodde på godtycklig avgränsning av militära stilleståndslinjer efter två krig – 1948 års frihetskrig och 1967 års sexdagarskrig. Allon uppfattade att 1967 års militarisering av arabiska styrkor direkt kunde kopplas till Israels topografiska exponering för attacker från Västbankens kullar, Golanhöjderna, Sinai öken och Gaza. Denna sårbarhet var specifik för vapenstilleståndslinjerna som hade uppstått som ett ovälkommet styvbarn, med upphörande av striderna 1949. Med Israels erövring av dessa strategiska områdena efter sexdagarskriget växte en ny demografisk svaghet upp, den lilla judiska staten administrerar nu arabiska muslimska befolkningscentra som tycktes vara i opposition mot principerna om parlamentarisk demokrati och ett judiskt hemland. Det var motsägande krav som måste lösas. Om Israel behöll det förvärvade territorie, bibehölls en sjudande underkuvad fiende i dess mitt. Om det avstod territorium godtogs den tidigare olyckliga situationen där de obönhörligen skulle bli attackerade igen.

Denna situation är särskilt akut på Västbanken, vars stora topografiska företeelse är en bergsrygg som löper i nord-sydlig riktning tusentals meter över den kustnära slätten i väster och Jordandalen i öster. Från punkter längs Judéen-Samariens bergsrygg skulle en observatör som blickade nedåt kustslätten, se ett smalt band av bebyggelse fram till Medelhavet,-proppfulla med viktig infrastruktur, utmärkt jordbruksmark, en internationell flygplats, och 70% av Israels befolkning. De flesta kustnära slättinvånarna är koncentrerade i två städer, Haifa och Tel Aviv, tydliga vid horisonten. Den kustnära slätten är hem för högteknologiska företag som är de spirande unga spelarna i den israeliska ekonomin, alla de stora motorvägarna som förbinder dess städer och 80 procent av landets industriella kapacitet. En sådan vy presenterar en imponerande samling av mål för en fientlig militär styrka.

Den kustnära slätten löper parallellt med åsen i 187 km, men är bara ca 15-25 km bred. Där finns många positioner i bergsmassivet varifrån man skulle kunna kontrollera kustlandskapet och åstadkomma verkliga skräckscenarier som kunde hållas under långa perioder. Flygplan vid Ben-Gurions flygplats skulle kunna utsätts för eld från bärbara luftvärnsrobotar som skulle, med ett enda penseldrag, orsaka stora förluster i människoliv och oskadliggöra den civila luftfarten på obestämd tid. Tel Aviv och Haifa är påtagligt hotade av möjligheten av granatkastare, raketer och surface-to-air missiler upp från åsen. Israels National vattenbärare, och dess högspända elektriska kraftledningar är uppenbara måltavlor för destruktion från positioner längs åsen, liksom Trans-Israel motorväg och andra vägar av avgörande betydelse för trupprörelse och handel. Kort sagt, den platta slätten som är själva kärnan i Israel skulle vara utomordentligt utsatt för dödande attacker från Västbankens kullar om 1949 års eldupphörlinjer återställdes.

En viktig del av Allon-planen för försvarbara gränser är en geologisk formation som kallas Jordan Rift Valley (JRV). En sprickdal är en avlång block-formad nersänkning av jordskorpan som orsakats av tektonisk aktivitet, i detta fall, för ganska många miljoner år sedan under miocenepoken. The JRV, en underavdelning av det passande namnet Great Rift som bländade astronauter från rymden, löper från Syrien till Röda havet. Den passerar den östra foten av Västbankens bergsrygg där den möter Jordandalen på en nivå av 1200 fot under havsnivån, bara lite uppströms den lägsta punkten på jordytan.

Allon plan tar genial användning av denna topologi. Efter att första gången ha tagits fram år 1967 och senare raffinerades i oktober 1976 utrikesminister, skulle planen har gett upp det mesta av Västbankens territorium, tillsammans med dess arabiska befolkning, till Jordanien. Men Israel skulle kräva ett 20 km säkerhetsbälte som omfattar den topografiskt robusta Jordandalen och åsen ovan. Planen kräver en konstnärlig användning av den kombinerade höjden av åsen och denna klyfta för att uppnå en 4200 fots barriär som skulle försvara sig mot angripare från öst (Jordan) och behålla sin ställning som övervakare av den kustnära slätten i väster. En rimlig extrapolering är att en neo-Allon plan skulle avträda större delen av Västbanken till en ny palestinsk stat – återigen behålla åsen och Jordandalen som en säkerhetszon som bifogas Israel och återupprätta Jordanfloden som den östra gränsen mot Jordanien.

Golanhöjderna

Golan passar väl i de bibliska gränserna för judarnas gamla hem, som tjänat som modell för den moderna “judiska hemlandet.” Moderna Palestina planerades av Balfourdeklarationen 1917, som var en avsiktsförklaring till regeringen i Storbritannien för att skapa en fristad för det judiska folket. Förklaringen, som utfärdades av utrikesministern Arthur James Balfour, var tänkt som en samvetshandling och ett svar på den virulenta antisemitism som gisslade Europa under de sista dagarna av första världskriget – och satte igång varningsklockorna i huvudet på förutseende observatörer. Deklarationens vision av ett återställt Israel gjordes påtaglig genom tidiga utkast av Nationernas Förbunds mandat som etablerade ett Palestina, utskuret från det besegrade Ottomanska Imperiet, som sträckte sig från Medelhavet till dagens moderna Irak. Balfourdeklarationen hade sådan moralisk och diplomatisk värdighet att det införlivades i fördraget i Sèvres.

Britterna såg däremot det nya mandatet som ett mönster för kohandel med andra makter i området, tilldelning av mark i utbyte mot geostrategiska eller diplomatiska fördelar. På detta sätt klipptes området öster om floden Jordan, ut från det palestinska mandatet och erbjuds som ett tröstpris till den Hashemitiska familjen för att förbättra Storbritanniens tidigare förolämpning för tilldelning av ett stort område till de konkurrerande Saudierna, så började det Hashemitiska konungariket Trans-Jordanien (numera Jordanien).

Våren 1923 hade mandatet för Palestina krympt till en smal remsa cirka 8.000 kvadrat miles (21.000 km2), ungefär två tredjedelar av storleken på Belgien. Det slutliga förhandlingsobjektet var lejonparten av Golanhöjderna, som byttes med Frankrike och infördes i det franska mandatet i utbyte mot Mosul, en stad vid Tigris som nu skulle vecklas in det brittiska paketet som öronmärktes som dagens Irak. Storbritannien hade fått veta att stora oljereserver hade upptäckts i Mosulregionen år 1918 och bytte ut det “värdelösa” men bibliskt betydande Golan för det historiskt syriska Mosul. Det franska mandatet förklarade ett oberoende Syrien 1946, utan det oljerika Mosul, men med kontrollerande positioner i Golanhöjderna, en formidabel deygt 400 kvadratkilometer platå som hägrade 3000 fot över Palestina.

En liten del av Golan hade stannat kvar i Palestinamandatet, men mycket av detta invaderades av anfallande syriska styrkorna i kriget 1948. Syrien tog kontroll över flera små, men strategiska remsor av territoriet och säkrade sitt grepp om båda bankerna i Jordanien, strandlinjen av Galileen och Banyas, en avgörande vattentäkt vid foten av Hermon som flödar från dess källor. Golans vattendelare är källan till mer än hälften av Israels färskvatten och utgör en del av grundvattensystemet som täcker nästan hela området. 1949 års vapenstillestånd hade införlivat dessa remsor till en icke-sammanhängande skenbart demilitariserad zon men den kränktes så rutinmässigt under Syriens dominans över Golan att Israels vattenförsörjning var under ständigt hot.

Israel tog kontroll över sitt vatten i denna demilitariserade zon genom olika, ytterst vardagliga vattenprojekt i Huleh Valley och sjön Kinneret (Galileiska sjön). Det verkar som om konkurrensen om vattenrättigheter mellan de två länderna skulle vara ett asymmetriskt spel där Syrien satsade liten risk, det erhåller 85% av det förnyelsebara vattnet från de två strömmarna i den Bördiga Halvmånen, dessa civilisationens navelsträngar, Tigris och Eufrats floder. Syrien är också väl försett av Orontes, som bevattnar dess nordliga regioner. Ändå använde Syrien sin dominans över höjderna för att motverka Israels blygsamma visning av suveränitet med en rad åtgärder som markerade Syriens 1949 till 67 förvaltarskap av Golan med ett distinkt otäck nyans och lade grunden för Israels motvilligt omfamnande av läran om försvarbara gränser:

Under åren efter vapenstilleståndet hotade Syrien flera gånger att förorena vattnet som Israel pumpade från sjön Kinneret. Syrien störde rutinmässigt fiske och andra israeliska projekt  i sjön. Fram med våld välta av israeliska militära angrepp, hade Syrien gjort stora framsteg i byggprojekt f;r att vidarekoppla Banyas och Hasbanifallen till Yarmoukfloden – över gränsen till Jordanien – f;r att förneka detta flöde till Israel. Israeliska fiskare avlivades en och en av krypskyttar från deras hål  i Golan, israeliska städer under Höjderna, såsom Ein GeV besköts upprepade gånger. Dessa åtgärder styrdes av Syriens regering och direkt emot  civilbefolkningen, de orsakade 140 civila dödsfall, många skadade och betydande skada för den ekonomiska strukturen i norra Israel. Denna taktikm visar faktisk illvilja och inte bara en kylig palnering av syriska intressen. Det kan väl noteras att Syriens förehavanden emot Israels användning av sjön Gennesaret är totalt irrationella eftersom sjön inte har bestridits av någon ritning av syrisk-israeliska linjer. Helheten brlyses av Syriens fortsatta materiella stöd till terroristorganisationer som inkluderar Hezb’allah, Hamas och Islamiska Jihad, samt dess allt närmare band till Iran.

Färskt blod: Jihad Factory

Den anti-sionistiska ethos inom arabisk kultur är helt klart en blandning av flera strömmar som inkluderar Wahhabism, islamism, mainstream islam, pan-arabism, “traditionell” antisemitism, och “politisk avund” – en formulering som utvecklats av George Gilder i hans senaste bok, The Israel Test. Den går långt bortom vårt nuvarande ämne, som är inriktat på Israels behov av försvarbara gränser,och försöker locka ut dessa religiösa, politiska och kulturella ämnen. Ändå är det klart att djupt rotade, metafysiska grunder för mycket anti-israeliska sentiment måste förmå den lilla staten att ta ansvar för sitt eget öde. Att förlita sig på rättvisa och god vilja från sina arabiska grannar, som har mycket litet kapital vis-à-vis Israel som mäts i dessa egenskaper, är destruktivt naivt och leker så tomt och kontraproduktivt med gester som “tillbakadragande” och Oslo, dessa åtgärder tolkas som svaghet av Israels fiender.

Fröet till frågan är att medan palestinaarabiska och andra arabiska ledare periodvis har tagit ett “top-down” förhållningssätt till “freds”-processen med Israel -varit nårvarande på konferenser, skakat hand, även talat om erbjudanden, har den arabisk-islamiska kultur fortsatt att pressa fram unga jihadister på gräsrotsnivå. Det är en stapelvara i formativ erfarenhet av unga araber att de är genomsyrade av propaganda mot judar och fullmatade att omfamna martyrskapet i de saudiska och Hamasfinansierade madrasas på Västbanken och Gaza – och i vanliga kommunala skolor. Israel måste vara ständigt uppmärksam på de i tionde klassen läser en text som berör ungdomlig anda, nämligen “martyr jihadkrigare är de mest hedrade människor efter profeten.”

Ovanstående kartor finns även på http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ och källor på defensibleborders.org. De publiceras med tillstånd av Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs: http://www.jcpa.org/. Uppgifter baserade på rapportering från Jane’s missiler och raketer och israeliska uttalanden från regeringen i internationella medier.

Kontakta Harry Kanigel på hkanigel@verizon.net

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Är det inte oliver är det får.

Vänsterextremister tagna på  bar gärning: Anklagelser om “brinnande får” ren lögn.

av Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

En arabisk jordbrukare i Jordandalen har avslöjat taktiken hos vänsteranhängare att acceptera arabiska påståenden och falskeligen anklaga judar för att attackera araber. Han medgav att påhittet med ett förtal mot judarna om att “bränna fåren” var tänkt att dölja hans egen dumhet att förlora kontrollen över en buskbrand.

Förra veckan spred vänstergrupper i Israel och motparter i Förenta staterna en berättelse som att en arabisk herde “såg bosättare tända eld i området där hans djur var på bete, att de brände till döds 12 dräktiga tackor och körde sedan iväg. “

Historien om de brinnande fåren var så extrem att polisen omedelbart betvivlade påståendet. Den förmodade bränningen av fåren inträffade på sabbaten, när religiösa judar, de vanliga syndabockarna, inte får köra bil.

Den arabiska jordbrukaren, Samir Bani Fadel, hävdade att fyra beväpnade judar närmade sig honom, jagade bort honom, satte eld på hans område – att göra upp eld är något som också är förbjudet på sabbaten – och körde bort när elden spred sig och  12 dräktiga tackor brändes till döds  medan den skadade andra .

Oberoende av tvivlen rusade extremvänstermänniskorättsgrupper som B’Tselem och Yesh Din fram för att påstå att den förmodade attacken var en annan av hundratals förmodade vandalistdåd av judar mot araber.

Den New York-baserade författaren Philip Weiss kopierade omgående ärekränkningen på sin Mondoweiss blogg, och bilder av får som grymt bränns för att väcka sympati för araber och hat mot judar. “Det var en hemsk syn,” sa bonden. “Jag har förlorat minst $ 12.000.”

Den palestinska myndigheten uppmanade det internationella samfundet att sätta press på Israel för att upphöra med “nybyggarnas våld.”

Berättelsen började upplösas när araberna pekade med sina fingrar mot invånarna i Itamar, ett lätt mål eftersom det är ett religiöst samfund, men ligger nästan en timmes bilresa från brandplatsen. Berättelsen ändrades sedan, och skulden lades på en mer närbelägen by, Maaleh Efraim, i vilken de flesta invånarna är yrkesverksamma och som nästan aldrig har anklagats för några aktioner mot araber.

Fadel medgav till slut för polisen att hela historien var en lögn och att han var ansvarig för branden, som han startat för att bränna törnen innan den spred sig bortom kontroll. Att skylla judarna inte bara skulle ha räddat honom från förlägenheten att ha bränt sina får, det också skulle tillåta honom att begära skadestånd från staten samtidigt som han hyllas som en hjälte bland palestinska myndighetens araber och anti-sionister på vänsterkanten.

Hundratals anklagelser mot judiska invånare i Judéen och Samarien har riktats på senare år, oftast påståenden att judarna har angripit eller förstört olivträd, även om det i de flesta fall har visat sig att araberna helt enkelt har beskurit sina träd, räknat med bristen på kunskap om hur  jordbruket utförs, hos media och vänstergrupper, och sedan har judar anklagats att skada dem. Olivträd ser “hackade” ut när de beskärs och månader senare har förment skadade fruktträdgårdar visats vara fulla av frukt.

En annan taktik har varit att inleda våld, i synnerhet på Shabbat när Judar förbjuds att ta bilder, och sedan anklaga judar att attackera dem.

Yossi Dagan, rådgivare till Samariens regionfullmäktige, kommenterade, “Det finns ett system bland vänstergrupper som driver kampanj för finansiella bidrag från främmande länder, av vilka många är fientliga till Israel. De använder Europeiska Unionens pengar, som nu har nått summor på  miljarder dollars de senaste åren. Många av arbetarna för vänstergrupper ha höga löner och utnyttjar rapporter från så kallade människorättsorganisationer och ägnar sig åt att resa över hela Judéen och Samarien och blåsa upp eller ändra fakta för att sprida förtal mot judar. “

Dagan förklarade att judar får skulden för brinnande bilar i arabiska byar när de i själva verket är skadade på grund av slagsmål mellan araber.

David Ha’Ivri, som leder Shomron (Samariens) sambandskontor som hanterar PR för de judiska samfunden i Samarien, sade: “Vi har en mycket svår uppgift att stå upp mot ett gäng välfinansierade frivilligorganisationer som B’Tselem och “Rabbiner för mänskliga rättigheter”, vars agenda är att skada bilden av staten Israel och de judiska invånarna i Yehuda och Shomron (Judéen och Samarien).

“Deras ärekränkande påståenden sväljs alltid av internationella media byråer som hoppar på en möjlighet att projicera en satanistisk bild av “onda judiska bosättare.” De händelser som rapporterats i denna berättelse är ett perfekt exempel på blodsskymf som drivs av frivilligorganisationer som påstår sig vara humanitära och fredsaktivister. “

.

DN337 DN875 DN999

.

....

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Mera om bananrepublikernas “deklaration av palestinsk stat”

[Uppdaterad 25 dec.]

Se också tidigare artikel.

Du kan ju – om du absolut måste – tänka efter hur man “erkänner” en icke existerande stat inom icke existerande gränser. Det är vad bananrepublikerna inkl. Norge har gjort. De talar också om en “oberoende” stat, hur oberoende den är kan du se här.

Vill du veta lite mera om Brasilien och Argentinas helt irrationella “deklaration av den palestinska staten” – här två artiklar du kan läsa.

Why Latin America turned.

Där en förklaring till varför de hux flux fick för sej att göra detta. Som vanligt var Obamas omåttliga velighet en ingrediens i deras brist på tänkande.

Recognition of a Palestinian State – Premature, Legally Invalid, and Undermining any Bona Fide Negotiation Process

Inledningen till denna pdf-rapport:

  • Uttalandet om erkännande av en palestinsk stat inom “1967 års gränser” från Brasilien, Argentina, och möjligen andra latinamerikanska stater har ingen betydelse annat än som en politisk åsiktsyttring.
  • Dessa handlingar av erkännande strider mot uttalanden från Brasilien och Argentina i FN: s säkerhetsråd år 1967 till förmån för förhandling om gränserna mellan parterna och en internationellt sponsrad fredsförhandlingsprocess som anges i resolution 242.
  • Det fortlöpande arbetet  av ledningen för den palestinska myndigheten för att uppnå erkännande av en ensidig statsbildning inom 1967 års gränser från diverse andra stater och därmed kringgå den accepterade förhandlingsprocessen, i strid med sina åtaganden i sina avtal med Israel, som bevittnats och garanterats av medlemmar i den internationella gemenskapen.
  • De fientliga handlingarna och uttalandena av det palestinska ledarskapet saknar bona fides och förstör alla möjligheter att uppnå en stämning för förhandlingar mellan parterna som syftar till att skapa fredliga relationer mellan dem, och visar på en fullkomlig brist på en genuin vilja att nå en fredlig lösning.

Kort sagt, dessa deklarationer är både meningslösa och barnsliga.....

USA säger kort och gott att om PA deklarerar sig som stat i stället för att förhandla om villkoren kommer de att missa enorma summor av bidragspengar.  Något som är rätt självklart.  De får bidrag just för att börja uppföra sig som en stat och inte som barnungar.

Annan kommentar här.

.

vg930 M DN GP815 AB502 HD BLT334 ALL255 D492

.

....

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Senaten ratificerar Obamas livsfarliga fördrag

Som alltid står svenska massmedia troget på Obamas sida och presenterar inte den andra sidan.

http://heritageforamerica.org/2010/12/senate-ratifies-president%E2%80%99s-dangerous-treaty/

December 22, 2010 Av Dan Holler

Tidigare i dag röstade den amerikanska senaten att ratificera president Obamas farligt bristfälliga nya START-fördrag. Fördraget, utropat av Vita huset som en stor utrikespolitisk seger, skulle genom att begränsa vårt missilförsvars förmåga undergräva Amerikas nationella säkerhet, begränsa vår icke-nukleära offensiva arsenal och ignorera hotet från Rysslands taktiska kärnvapen.

Heritages VD Michael A. Needham gjorde följande uttalande:

Alla ögon är nu på Obama-administrationen. Under hela debatten försäkrade den senatorer och det amerikanska folket att New START inte skulle skada vår nationella säkerhet.

Om den ryska regeringen försöker använda fördraget för att begränsa robotförsvar, vägrar att förhandla i god tro om taktiska kärnvapen eller fortsätter att stödja och underblåsa Iran ska administrationen omedelbart frånträda avtalet.

Nya START är historiskt, men inte på ett bra sätt:

  • - aldrig har en stort fördrag hamrats genom senaten under en “lam anka”-session;
  • - den största motståndet mot ett ratificerande i mer än tre decennier, och
  • - placerar Amerikas intresse bakom ryssarnas.

President Obama lovade senatorer och amerikaner att fördraget inte skulle undergräva vår nationella säkerhet. Vi observerar noggrant för att se till att det inte gör det. Många potentiella republikanska presidentkandidater tittar också. Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, John Thune, Newt Gingrich och Sarah Palin uttryckte alla sitt motstånd mot fördraget.

För konservativa aktivister som har bekämpat fördraget med näbbar och klor mot ratificering i dag har idag anledning att vara besvikna. I ett mail berättade Needham för supportrar:

Kort sagt, stod du tå-till-tå mot en omfattande politisk och diplomatisk maskin beväpnad med tiotals miljarder av skattebetalarnas pengar.

Medan jag förstår det är av föga betydelse, särskilt med tanke på allvarliga konsekvenser för säkerheten i fördraget – konsekvenserna Obama-administrationen vägrade erkänna under hela debatten – kan vi fortfarande vara stolta över vårt tappra motstånd.

Verkligen. Och med tanke på den  fortsatta envisheten hos regeringsliberalerna, blir det ingen vila för de trötta. Nu när denna denna makalösa “lam anka”-session avslutas måste de konservativa ha siktet inställt på nästa kongress. Vi kommer att behöva samma passion, aktivism och eld som visats den 2 november för att hålla den nya kongressen ansvarig.

Tills dess, njut av semester, har en God Jul och ett Gott Nytt År. Och om du har en minut, tacka de senatorer som gjorde rätt angående den  nya START.

En annan kommentar här.

Ytterligare en.

.

DN DN D276 DN HD LTZ141 Ek242

.

....

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Israel hjälper Gaza exportera trots raketregn mot judiska kvinnor och barn. Uppdrag Granskning.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/141065

av Chana Ya’ar

Israel har bidragit till att förbättra Gazas ekonomi högst avsevärt under det senaste året trots fortsatt raketbeskjutning från regionens terrorister riktat mot samhällen i Negev. Enligt en rapport i september från Internationella Valutafonden, växte Gazas ekonomi med 16% under första halvåret 2010, en trend som väntades fortsätta under andra hälften av året också.

Israel godkände nyligen export av jordgubbar och blommor från Gaza till europeiska marknader, vilket har resulterat i export av 23 ton frukt och 33.000 blommor hittills.

Ytterligare väntas exporten fokusera på jordbruk, möbler och textilier, enligt en kommuniké som utfärdades efter onsdagens möte i säkerhetskabinettet. Exporten kommer att omfattas av säkerheten och logistiska förberedelser vid Kerem Shalomkorsningen.

Raketbeskjutningen fortsätter med oförminskad styrka

Trots den förbättrade Gaza-ekonomin och lättnader på restriktionerna vid gränsövergångarna, fortsätter terrorister i Hamas-kontrollerade områden att rikta raketer och granateld mot södra Israel.

På tisdag och tidigt på onsdagen, avfyrades minst fem kortdistansraketer och granater mot samhällen i västra Negev. En man fördes till Soroka Medical Center i Be’er Sheva med måttliga sår från en av attackerna, och ett hus skadades.

Mer än 200 missileer från Hamas-kontrollerat område har landat i Israel sedan början av 2010. Enbart i november kom 52 angrepp från terrorister emot Israel – en lätt förhöjning över 44 i oktober.

Nästan dubbla leveranser från Israel genom Kerem Shalom

Medan raketbeskjutningen har fortsatt, så har leveranserna av varor till Gaza via Kerem Shalom korsning, nära den plats där IDF soldaten Gilad Shalit kidnappades av Hamas terrorister i juni 2006. Shalit hålls fortfarande som gisslan i Gaza av Hamas, hans exakta vistelseort och tillstånd är okänt.

Sedan juni har det skett en 92% ökning av antalet lastbilar som levererar varor dagligen till regionen. Ökningen kom efter ett beslut av Säkerhetsrådet att utöka kapaciteten vid Gazas korsningar och expandera verksamheten för att möjliggöra bearbetning av en större volym av varor. Total avsaknad av beslut att försöka få stopp på terrorn från muslimska terrorister i Gaza

I beslutet ingick en order om att aktivera och expandera inflödet av kontrollerat konstruktionsmaterial för projekt som godkänts av den palestinska myndigheten och som står under internationell övervakning. Tidigare bruade Hamas direkt stjäla dylika leveranser när de förekom.

Dessutom eliminerar Israel sin förteckning över produkter tillåtna för import, och har istället offentliggjort en lista över förbjudna föremål, vilket kraftigt utökat alternativen för import av lookala affärsmän och humanitära hjälporganisationer. Listan över objekt som inte tillåts in i Gaza har sedan dess endast begränsats till vapen och krigsmateriel, vilket inkluderar problemet med dubbla användningsområden. Kloakrör används alltsom oftast i stället för tillverkning av Kassamraketer.

“Trots den utbyggnad av kapaciteten i landets gränsövergångar, som tillåter 250 lastbilar att komma in i Gazaremsan på daglig basis, i praktiken har palestinierna inte utökat kapaciteten på deras sida,” noterar säkerhetstjänstemän. Sedan början av augusti har de i genomsnitt bara kunnat ta emot 176 lastbilar in i regionen dagligen.

Cirka 1.500 lastbilar (omkring 50.000 ton) av byggnadsmaterial har levererats till Gaza för utvecklingsprojekt som finansieras och övervakas av det internationella samfundet. Detta för att förhindra att produkterna stjäls för att användas av terroristorganisationer, inklusive att bygga upp deras militära styrka.

Mer än 400 fordon har också levererats till regionen för den privata sektorn, och leverans av nya produkter, som påbörjades i juli, utgör nu 32% av den totala mängden varor som levereras dagligen.

För närvarande har 76 projekt godkänts av Israel och av den palestinska myndigheten, PA. Alla har internationell finansiering och tillsyn och genomförs med betoning på utbildning, infrastruktur, hälsovård och bostäder.

Uppdrag Granskning

De har just ägnat en massa av mina skattepengar på att älta fram gammal skåpmat och inte en enda ny vinkling. Se debatt på denna länk. Det är samla gäng av gamla kommunister och extremister som ständigt släpas fram i rampljuset och när det finns två folkrättsprofessorer som har sagt helt olika saker om den turkiska terroristflottan med dess 6-700 mänskliga sköldar, inklusive svenskar – som Bildt har höjt till skyarna, exakt som Abbas höjer arabiska massmördare av judar till skyarna. Då drar Operation Granskning fram den judehatande professorn och gömmer den andra under kjolarna.

Att man fortfarande kan blogga om eländet är alltid något så länge det varar – har funderat på vad man ska göra sen. Registrera bloggen nån annanstans? Det är ju lika trivialt som att Wikileaks kan registrera sej i Sverige. Bland annat.

TT ljuger som alltid – och glömmer hälften i “Israel öppnar för Gazaexport” !!!

Tänk om TT någon enstaka gång hade berättat hela verkligheten för svenskarna. Att Gaza har problem pga Hamas terrorstyre hörs ytterligt sällan – det är Israels försvar av sig själv som blir utskällt. Och man glömmer bekvämt att där är en stor gränsövergång till Egypten. Och att Israel inte har den minsta skyldighet att mata Gazanerna enligt internationell lag. Och att varje land har full kontroll över vad de släpper över sina egna gränser.

Man glömmer lika lätt att EU hade lovat se till att övergången till Egypten fungerade bra för folk och varor, men de sprang som skållade råttor när Hamas tog makten, och visade vem som var starkast – Hamas versus EU.

När judarna lämnade Gaza för 5 år sedan gjorde de också allt för att Gazanerna skulle få ett självständigt liv, visa hur de ville utveckla en palestinsk stat. Hade de gjort sitt bästa hade Olmert sedan tillämpat samma princip på Judéen/Samarien.

Jag skrev för länge sedan om Paradiset Gaza, en gammal version ligger här. När judarna lämnade fick Gazanerna till skänks mer än 3000 toppmoderna växthus köpta av rika amerikanska judar och Bill Gates. De satte inte igång att odla – Israel hade förberett exportvägarna – de slog isönder växthusen i stället och Hamas sköt på gränsövergångarna. Läs artikeln, du kan också Googla efter greenhouses Gaza.

Vad Blair än råkar säga har inte Israel hindrat Gaza från att exportera via Egypten.

Hamas har mycket påtagligt visat att de importerar stora mängder vapen via tunnlar och havet. EU har inte gjort det minsta för att försöka hjälpa till att stoppa detta flödet – de har enbart pratat och överöst både Gaza och Judéen/Samarien med enormasummor av våra skattepengar utan att fråga skattebetalarna.

MEN – de har inte placerat en enda industriby där, för att ge folk jobb och betala av med produkter och därmed ge dom lite stolthet tillbaka!

.

SvT058 DN523 DN877

.

Blog: pophöger,

.

....

GD Star Rating
loading…
GD Star Rating
loading…

Share

Obama motarbetar Israel i UN Human Rights Council

Av Anne Bayefsky Publicerad September 16, 2010 I onsdags i Genève under den aktuella sessionen för FN: s Råd För Mänskliga Rättigheter, blev Obama-administrationen en villig deltagare i FN: s införande av ett apartheid-liknande förbud mot företrädare för staten Israel. Trots de löften som den amerikanska myndigheten gav när USA beslöt att deltaga i UNHRC, om att försöka förbättra tillståndet inom denna organnisation, så valde US ambassadör där, Eileen Donahoe att  delta fullt ut i ett möte som avsiktligt uteslöt någon som representerar den judiska staten. Israel är den enda FN-staten som inte tillåts att vara fullvärdig medlem av någon av FN: s fem regionala grupper. Under alla sessioner som UNHCR har hållit, när dessa grupper håller väsentliga planeringsmöten och delar viktig information, sker det bakom stängda dörrar. Till och med den icke-existerande palestinska staten får vara med som medlem i den asiatiska regionala gruppen, men Israel är uteslutet även om det ofta är med i gruppen för "Västeuropa och andra". I stället för att vägra att delta tills denna uppenbara diskriminering upphör, gick Obamas företrädare genom dörren, smällde den i ansiktet på israelerna och slog sej ner i de bekväma stolarna. Medan israelerna står där i hallen under rådets regionala möten denna vecka tog Libyen för första gången sin plats som en fullfjädrad rådsledamot. Övriga fullt röstande medlemmar i FN: s ledande organ för mänskliga rättigheter omfattar sådana modellstater som Saudiarabien, Kina, Kuba, Ryssland och Kirgizistan. Att gå med i Rådet för Mänskliga Rättigheter var ett av president Obamas första utrikespolitiska beslut. Han visste då - liksom idag - att rådet har antagit fler resolutioner och beslut som fördömer staten Israel än alla andra 191 FN-medlemmar kombinerat. Han visste att i den permanenta formella dagordningen för rådet ingår en post för att fördöma Israel och en för resten av världen. Men istället för att vägra att skänka legitimitet till en kropp med dessa djupt rotade fördomar, valde presidenten att gå och direkt satsa skattebetalarnas dollar och hävda att han skulle vara rådets store reformator. På måndagen upprepade ambassadör Donahoe i The New York Times,  påståendet att USA:s engagemang fyllde "ett vakuum av ledarskap" och hävdade att "Rådet är engagerat i en allvarlig självreflektion för att förbättra sitt arbete och funktion med avseende på dess centrala mandat att skydda mänskliga rättigheter. " Samma dag som Donahoes debattartikel dök upp, satte de 57 medlemmarna i Organisationen för den islamiska konferensen (OIC) Obama på hans plats vad gällde alla idéer om reformer. OIC håller maktbalansen i rådet, eftersom rådets majoritet består av medlemmar från afrikanska och asiatiska regionala grupper, och OIC länderna utgör en majoritet i både de afrikanska och asiatiska grupperna. I ett tal på måndagen, på uppdrag av OIC, förklarade Pakistan: "OIC ... har alltid betonat att detta är ... inte en reformövning. Det är vår åsikt att denna mellanstatliga process ... inte åter öppnar paketet [avtalet från juni 2007 som reglerar rådets verksamhet och antog dagordningen att speciellt peka ut Israel] ... Rådet har mandat att inte behöva göra mer än att finslidär det behövs. " Obamas administrations push att karaktärisera sitt engagemang med rådet som en framgång är faktamässigt felaktigt på många plan. Till exempel hävdade Donahoe i The Times att "I juni samarbetade USA med 55 andra nationer för att kritisera den beklagliga situationen för mänskliga rättigheter i Iran ... USA:s engagemang i Rådet för Mänskliga Rättigheter fungerar. " Detta är en stor nyhet för de mänskliga rättigheternas offer i Iran. Vad som faktiskt hände var att den 15 juni läste Norges ambassadör till Rådet upp ett 171-sekunders uttalande om Iran. Hon avbröts 14 gånger, och mötet avbröts i mitten av hennes uttalande i två timmar. När mötet återupptogs, ansåg sig ambassadör Bente Angell-Hansen tvungen att utelämna ordet "Iran" på flera ställen från sin ursprungliga texten och smärtsamt läsa "Vi uppmanar "ovannämnda regering" att leva upp till de åtaganden som det har åtagit sig ..." Dessutom , har rådet aldrig antagit ett enda resolution om Iran, och bakom stängda dörrar avslutat en försiktig undersökning av mänskliga rättigheter i Iran den 26 mars 2007. Det amerikanska engagemanget med rådet är inte bara en övning i meningslöshet. Rådet är en plats där icke-demokratier driver agendan, medan Israel är undanskuffat. Med dess aktiva deltagande i möten som medvetet utesluter bara israeler, främjar Obama-administrationen mänskliga fel, skyddar inte de mänskliga rättigheterna. Anne Bayefsky is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute and director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust. Se även denna artikel.....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Fortsatt åsiktscensur hos Newsmill

"Därför reagerade jag mot den antisemitiska utställningen"

Den artikeln, med ovanstående titel, visades på Newsmill idag, jag skrev kommentar:
Det helt bedrövliga är att både svenska massmedia och "konstnärer" är Israelhatare och har låtit det bli favorisering av terrorgruppen Hamas, vars viktigaste stadga är Folkmord av alla judar. De är helt tysta med att Israel tar emot mer än 10000 sjuka per år från Gaza. Alla som inte är kända terrorister OCH som Hamas inte stoppar från utresa, vilket sker i mänga fall. Israel behandlar ett mycket stort antal sjuka speciellt barn, från hela Arabvärlden och Afrika, se israelisverige.info/?p=16 Gå till http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/humanitarianaid/palestinians/ så ser du en översikt över de enorma mängderna numanitärt gods som Israel transporterar till Gaza. Titta på http://countercultureconservative.wordpress.com/tag/obesity-gaza-blockade-israel-starving-starvation-hunger-food-weapons-rockets-hamas/ så ser du att palestinierna är bland jordens fetaste!!! När såg du senast en bild och artikel om de milslånga lastbilsköerna med varor till Gaza från Israel i svenska massmedia? Du har sett många på de proisraeliska bloggarna - nån gång hånades detta av svenska massmedia. En annan väsentlig punkt massmedia och "konstnärer" är dödstysta om är - kolla Gaza. Ena änden lever i lyx, bloggarna är fulla med bilder från överfulla marknader, simbassänger i olympisk klass, vattensport, folk på stranden. Å andra sidan visar massmedia trasiga människor i flyktingläger betalda av UNRWA, d.v.s. av dej och mej. Hamas vägrar göra livet bättre för dem eftersom de används som skådebröd av journalister, och för att suga in mer pengar från oss. Varför fördelar inte Hamas allt de har lite bättre bland alla Gazabor? Varför nämns det inte i våra massmedia? Är de så lättlurade? Se alla båtflockar med bl.a. svenska mänskliga sköldar som enbart kommer för att stödja Hamas. Senast hade de med sig lite varor som Hamas vägrade ta emot. Har du läst att Gazas ekonomi har gått upp med 16% i år? Medan Västbankens enbart har gått upp med ca 9%, jämfört med Sverige på 5%. Israel sände just 250 ton material för nytt reningsverk. Israel sänder enorma mängder sjukvårdsmaterial och släpper igenom allt som inte kan användas för vapen av terroristerna, se översikt på http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/humanitarianaid/palestinians/ Trots välkända fakta sätter alltså Israelhatare upp bilder där de jämför Israel med Nazityskland, detta på publika platser.......
Den censurerades omedelbart bort - varför? . Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ingen-antisemitism-pa-Stockholms-Stadsbibliotek/122628507793338?v=wall SvD967 X504 . ....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Ariel

Har du hört talas om Ariel? En judisk universitetsstad i Samarien.  den ligger exakt där den måste ligga för att utgöra ett högbeläget skydd för attack emot centrala Israel, där de flesta människor bor. Förstörs den staden, som Obama hade älskat att göra, kommer samma sak att hända som när alla judar lämnade Gaza. Vem blev lycklig? Vem hade blivit lycklig mer än Obama? Här en överblick över området: Och 3D-kartan som jag visat innan som demonstrerar varför Israel av säkerhetsskäl inte kan lämna de gamla judiska områdena Judeen och Samarien: När hörde du senast någon svensk politiker eller journalist visa det så klart? Jag skriver detta just nu därför en hög stora tidningar i USA som Christian Science MonitorWashington Post, och flera andra  anser att Obama ska förstöra alltsammans. De sluter helt och hållet upp för den arabiska sidan gentemot judarna. Obama glädjestrålande förstås, vilket är avsikten. En naturbild nära Ariel. Också något Obama vill förstöra. En del, både i Stockholm och Tel Aviv tror att Samarien ligger på andra sidan Månen, inte några tiotals minuter i bil från Tel Aviv eller Jerusalem, så i städerna i Israel som hade hamnat i samma situation som Sderot om inte Ariel hade varit, har gjorts reklam och erbjdanden att komma och besöka och se. Israels största tidning åkte en runda och tog lite bilder. Mer om stan på denna länk. Där var en del snack att en handfull israeliska artister av extremvänstertyp vägrade uppträda där - artister som gärna hade uppträtt i vilket arabland som helst. Resten av israelerna blev högeligen irriterade..... 11500 studenter har just börjat det nya akademiska året i Ariel, varav 500 är araber. Fel det också?
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Fångade med byxorna nere: “Peace Now” samarbetar med USA emot Israel.

Peace Now eskorterar amerikanska tjänstemän vid judiska bosättningar

av Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu Hagit Ofran, en tjänsteman från den politiska extremvänster-lobbygruppen  Peace Now, fotograferades i tisdags när hon eskorterar amerikanska tjänstemän och tar bilder på den judiska byn Revava i Samareen. Amerikanska tjänstemän har avböjt att kommentera och hänvisade frågor till konsulatets taleskvinna, som hittills inte har besvarat en förfrågan om telefonintervju. Ofran, barnbarn till den avlidna israeliska filosofen Yeshayahu Leibowich, också på extremvänsterkanten, reser ofta till judiska församlingar i Judéen för att dokumentera byggandet av judiska bostäder, som Peace Now motsätter sig. Hon gömde ansiktet efter att ha sett att hon var fotograferad av Samariens sambandsråd regissören David Ha'Ivri, som hälsade henne med ett "hej". Ha'Ivri såg också henne med Jonathan Cullen, en politisk officer med konsulatet. Ha'Ivri, vars grupp är en officiellstatig myndighet i Samarien, som tidigare har rest med Cullen förklarar för honom fakta som inte hade varit kända atv amerikanska tjänstemän, till exempel förhållandet mellan judiska arbetsgivare och arabiska arbetare och omfattningen av judisk industriell utveckling i Judéen och Samarien. Ha'Ivri berättade för Israel National News att han frågade Cullen, "Vad gör du - spionerar på oss?" Cullen svarade, "V äri bara på besök." Ha'Ivri sade till INN, "Vi ger USA information de inte visste" om judiskt liv i Judéen och Samarien ", och vi har ingenting att dölja. Nu kommer de tillbaka med en politisk extremvänstergrupp. " INN försökte i Jerusalem be amerikanska konsulatet att samma eskort privilegier skulle beviljas nationalistiska lobbygrupper, men ingen var tillgänglig för kommentarer. Cullen, liksom en amerikansk ambassad talesman i Tel Aviv, hänisade alla frågor till konsulatet. Tisdagen var inte första gången Ofran kände sig tvungen att dölja sin identitet eller sin kamera. Global Post's Fredy Gareis skrev förra månaden, "Med en van rörelse gömmer Hagit Ofran sin kamera under sätet, när hon stannar sin  vita SUV framför en [IDF] vägspärr." . DN800 D913 DN265 . ....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Varför vänstertjejer älskar att resa till Västbanken

Araber trakasserar kvinnliga "freds"aktivister, vänstern tystar offren

av Gil Ronen Två aktivister har visat på ett oroande fenomen som de säger är en offentlig hemlighet inom "fredsrörelsen": kvinnliga "freds"aktivister blir rutinmässigt trakasserade och våldtagna av araberna i Judéen och Samarien med vilka de har kommit att identifiera sig. De säger att fenomenet har blivit värre nyligen och att många utländska kvinnor hamnar som hustrur till lokala araberna mot sin vilja, men kan inte undkomma sina nya hem. Roni Aloni Sedovnik, en feministisk aktivist, har skrivit en artikel i news 1 - en oberoende webbplats som drivs av respekterade undersökande reporter Yoav Yitzchak - under rubriken "Vänsterns svek mot kvinnliga fredsaktivister som blev utsatta för sexuellt våld." "Ett äcklig illdåd har pågått under en lång tid bakom kulisserna på vänstern" vid demonstrationer vid Bil'in, Naalin och Sheikh Jarrah [Shimon HaTzaddik] ", skriver hon. "En mörk hemlighet som hotar att krossa de grundläggande ideologiska värderingar som trycket att avsluta ockupationen av territorierna baseras på." Det visar sig, förklarar hon, att när kvinnliga fredsaktivister från Israel och utomlands kommer ut i Judéen och Samarien och demonstrerar mot den israeliska "ockupationen", överfalls de sexuellt av arabiska män som de har kommit för att hjälpa. Dessa är inte isolerade händelser, betonar Aloni-Sedovnik. Snarare är detta ett "pågående och omfattande" fenomen som inkluderar verbala och fysiska övergrepp. Hon anklagar  "freds"-läger för att avsiktligt dölja trenden så de inte förolämpar "palestinierna och deras arv, som ser kvinnor som sexobjekt."

Media-mörkläggningen

Aloni-Sedovnik citerar två specifika fall hon har kunskap om - ".Ett fall av våldtäkt och ett annat är "allvarliga sexuella trakasserier". Anfallarna var i båda fallen bekanta med offren och visste att de var "fredsaktivister", Våldtäkten inträffade för flera månader sedan i byn Umm Salmona, nära Betlehem. Offret, en amerikansk aktivist, ville väcka åtal men vänsterorienterade aktivister satte press på henne att inte göra det, så du inte skadar kampen mot "ockupationen". Det andra rörde sig om en israelisk aktivist som deltog i demonstrationerna vid Shimon HaTzaddik, en stadsdel i östra Jerusalem, där High Court fastställde att judiska familjer får flytta in i hem som de har ägt i generationer. Denna kvinna lämnade in en polisanmälan men drog tillbaka den efter "allvarliga och orättvisa påtryckningar" från demonstrationernas organisatörer, enligt Aloni-Sedovnik. Dessutom vädjade arrangörerna till demonstranterna att klä sig anständigt när de kommer till de arabiska stadsdelarna och föreslog att de bär slöja. Aloni-Sedovnik anklagar de israeliska medierna för delaktighet i mörkläggningen.
"Hur kommer det sig att vi inte hör en enda röst från de radikala feminister som upprepar dag och natt, att "ockupationen" är ockupation, och det spelar ingen roll om det är en nation som underkuvar, eller en man som underkuvar ett kvinna? "Det verkar som det finns ett gap mellan den radikala vänsterorienterade feministiska teorin om det aktiva motståndet mot ockupationen av territorier och det stammande förnekandet av sig själv inför den våldsamma erövringen av kvinnor."
Umm Salmona-fallet rapporterades i Haaretz som ett försök till våldtäkt, men verkar inte ha gjort det bortom bloggsidorna.

Utländska kvinnor våldtagna och underkuvade

Tidigare i år skrev en bloggare och litteraturälskare vid namn Yehudah Bello, som skriver inom olika områden om historia och evolutionsteori, ett blogginlägg med den slående titeln "Female Leftist Aktivists are raped day after day, night after night. "Bello är ingen ultra-nationalist, och han stöder inrättandet av ett PA-stat - ett faktum som gör hans påståenden desto mer trovärdiga. De flesta kvinnliga europeiska aktivister på vänsterkanten, skriver Bello, är hjärntvättade i sin ungdom till att hata Israel, och sedan skickas de direkt till Judeen och Samarien, utan att spendera en enda natt i Tel Aviv, så att de ser det civila israeliska samhället på egen hand och kan råka upptäcka att de gillar det . De forslas iväg till Sikem, Jenin och andra palestinska städer och placeras i arabiska skolor och kulturinstitut eller privata hem. Lokala arabiska flickor skickas till dem med order att bli vänner,  och de har inget annat val än att lita på dem. Det är enkelt, förklarar Bello, "att genomföra ett sexualbrott mot en utländsk tjej under hennes första dagar borta från sin familj, på en plats där ingen polis någonsin har besökt. Och detta är vad som händer och har hänt. " "Jag fick veta om sådana våldtäkter från kvinnor som inte är judiska: en kvinnlig europeisk vänsteraktivist, en kvinnlig Röda Korset-volontär och en ung arabisk kvinna från Jaffa, säger han Han säger att han träffade dessa kvinnor när han tjänstgjorde i IDFs reserv, och träffade dem efteråt också. "De berättade för mig vad som pågår där, i de palestinska byarna, långt från alla nyfikna ögon." . "Dessa är inte bara fall av våldtäkt som utförs för att tillfredsställa lusten", skriver han "Vanligtvis utförs de systematiskt för att göra flickan gravid och sedan ta henne till hustru - efter att hon konverterar till islam, förstås. Vi vet om detta system från berättelser av kvinnor som genomgick en liknande process inom Israel och flydde till Europa Men det är svårt att fly från de palestinska områdena. Ibland tillåts dessa kvinnor -.. en del av dem är inte unga längre - aldrig att lämna sina hem ensamma, för att undvika att de flyr. " Om någon skulle jämföra listan över utländska kvinnliga aktivister som kommer till Judéen och Samarien med listan över de som lämnar, hävdar Bello, skulle omfattningen av fenomenet bevisas. "Alla vet om det, men ingen vågar prata om det. Palestinierna har förvandlats till martyrer. I Mellanösterns TV-kanaler representeras  israeliska soldater som brutala våldtäktsmän, som våldtar palestinska kvinnor. "

New Israel Funds engagemang

Rapporterna från Aloni-Sedovnik och Bello är av särskilt intresse, eftersom feministiska grupper har gått i spetsen för vänsterorienterad aktivism i Israel under många år. Enligt Gila Svirsky, tidigare chef för New Israel Fund i Israel och grundare av NIF-sponsrade Women's Coalition for Peace "kvinnliga fredsorganisationer, som tillsammans benämns de israeliska kvinnornas fredsrörelse, är den mest livliga och ihållande delen av fredslägret i Israel". Dessa grupper hyllar en ideologi som jämställer militarism (av israelerna) med manlig dominans av kvinnor. Långt ifrån att vara en marginell del, är vänsterorienterade feminister av det slaget en dominerande kraft inom den israeliska akademiska världen, pressen, Knesset och rättsväsendet.....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Sveriges “kristna” vänster

Diakonias Weiderud har en blogg,  Kristen Vänster, där han förhärligar Hamas och uttrycker sin antisemitism - senast på denna länken, där han talar om att Israel inte får försvara sig mot terrorister, nämner inte med ett andetag att Hamas hade sänt raketer och granater över judiska kvinnor och barn innan Israel attackerade tunnlar där de smugglar vapen in till Gaza. Jag lade in två helt sakliga kommentarer där, bägge avlägsnades omedelbart. Ingen kritik tillåten. En glädjande nyhet till Sveriges "kristna" vänster: Hamas har nu raketer som kan gå längre än Tel Aviv, vilket väl får Weiderud att dansa och dela ut karameller, som de gör i Gaza när de lyckats döda en jude. Det var ett antal år sedan jag slutade kalla mej kristen efter det att sådana typer har kapat ordet "kristen", och ingen inom Kyrkan eller någonstans protesterar i kristendomens namn, tvärtom skriker de med i den antisemitiska kören.....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Hur extremvänstern i Israel ordnar akademiska kurser i hjärntvätt, i att hata armén, sionism

Origianl in Maariv in Hebrew This is the Isracampus Translation

Academic Brainwashing

(Isracampus Translation From the Hebrew)

Ben Dror Yemini – August 20th, 2010 (a condensed version appeared in print in Maariv and a longer version on the Maariv blog)

Israeli universities were not established with the sole purpose of promoting any Zionist vision of Israel.  A call for an academic boycott against Israel or a call to dismiss professors from the left or from the right is unworthy of consideration.  Yet when respected branches of Israeli academia allow themselves to be misused as tools of an anti-Zionist agenda and as de facto appendages of radical left-wing NGOs – it is imperative to make this known. The problem arises when the right to publicize and criticize is met with a counter campaign designed to intimidate, expose, and condemn.  That is what threatens both freedom of expression and proper public discourse. A case in point:  Here is the official description (http://law.huji.ac.il/merkazim.asp?cat=936&in=610) of a university course given at an Israeli university: "The course will focus on the controlling techniques that were generated by the Israeli occupation in the territories. We will study the historic sources of these techniques and will attempt to place them within the colonialist context, especially that of the British and French." Sounds somewhat dubious, but nevertheless it is not a crime to teach about the "Israeli Occupation," and it is even permissible to invent an artificial connection with Western colonization from previous centuries. The course description continues as follows: "In addition to Prof. Yehouda Shenhav, attorney Michael Sfard will oversee the course as a guest lecturer and as legal advisor to the Yesh Din NGO – 'Volunteers for Human Rights.'  Twice a month students will participate in activities within the framework of Yesh Din's 'Monitoring the Military Courts Project' and with 'Machsom Watch's' District Coordination and Liaison Aid Project. "The students, working under the guidance and supervision of the above organizations, will document, advocate and confront the IDF Civil Administration authorities, while keeping a precise, daily record of their activities.  Those activities will be overseen by attorney Yael Barda at the individual level and as a group. The students will receive transportation fare to places of activism, in addition to a stipend of NIS 1,450.  At the end of the year, students will submit an article based upon their activities and experiences, relating to the theoretical content of the course.  Some of the articles will be included in a booklet edited by Prof. Shenhav, Michael Sfard and Yael Barda, in cooperation with the above organizations." So is this an academic course or is it the deliberate brainwashing of students, conducted by three people who have never attempted to conceal their partisan political identities?  Is this an academic seminar, or is it an activism training workshop run by radical left wing organizations?  Should a university be permitted to engage in agitprop within the confines of a "course" that masquerades as an academic exercise?  Should students publish their "course work" in a book written in cooperation with partisan political organizations? We did not have to go to the university for answers to these questions, since from experience we know their kneejerk automatic answer will be: "Freedom of Expression". The syllabus for that course then gets even worse.  It lists a series of articles that taken together could successfully serve as tools for an indoctrination camp, in a course that should be entitled, "Introduction to political brainwashing for the purpose of delegitimizing the State of Israel." There is also a film included in as educational material the syllabus: It is "The Specialist", directed by one of the most lethal anti-Israel directors in the world, Eyal Sivan.  The movie is supposedly based on Hannah Arendt's, "The Banality of Evil" (http://www.tau.ac.il/~shura1/1/paper1.PDF).  Nazism, according to Arendt, is the result of bureaucratic banality. There is no need to create an explicit connection between Eichmann's evil and Sivan's take on Israel, and I have no idea whether or not one was pointed out to students in that course.   However the analogy is obvious.  Murderous Nazism and the Israeli Occupation have in common the same bureaucratic banality. Pravda, back in the Dark Ages of the USSR, could learn a thing or two from this seminar. Of course the course instructors can also continue to profess innocence and respond, "Who?  Us?  Brainwashing? What are you talking about?!" The filme itself pretends to be a documentary.  In actual fact, it turns out to be a work of fraud.  Hillel Tryster (http://www.notes.co.il/eshed/32229.asp), who was the director of the Steven Spielberg Jewish Film Archive, examined the film and concluded that it was a perverse fraud.   It is a leading contender for championship in the Fabrication Industry. In addition, the legal advisor to Jerusalem's Hebrew University filed a complaint against the movie and its maker, claiming that many sections of the "documentary" film were forged (http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Eichmann/trialfilm_forgery.htm.) Sivan's manipulations are indeed worthy of study as a case point in the use of the cinema for brainwashing –  but not as learning material in a seminar course in the School of Law.  Such a course might work well as part of the list of school requirements at the Islamic University in Gaza, or in a Political Science course in Teheran.  But this is a course taught in the School of Law at the Hebrew University. It is doubtful whether one should even call this an academic course.  It would be more accurate to define it as a left-wing political workshop, coupled with a propaganda movie that the same university filed a complaint against as being fraudulent.  It is masquerading as an academic course. In another course taught by Shenhav at Tel Aviv University, there are no less than 38 articles included in the course work that were published in the Marxist and blatantly anti-Zionist magazine, "Theory and Criticism."   Of course. Shenhav himself is editor of that magazine.  Brainwashing?  Of course not! They'll call it "Critical Discourse." "Partnership" (a seminar for student activists) is another ambitious project of the Hebrew University.  It is organized by dozens of NGOs, mostly from the radical Left.  In it the "Nakba" is taught by an activist from the radical left organization, "Zochrot," which advocates the Right of Return (for Palestinian Arabs to Israel) and the elimination of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Can such a concentrated exercise in blatantly anti-Zionist brainwashing be considered to be a bona fide academic course?  And where is the Council for Higher Education?  Where is the Minister of Education? And why do Israeli taxpayers have to fund such a "seminar"? As revealed recently in an article by Yishai Friedman in the Makor Rishon newspaper, The New Israel Fund grants NIS 7,400 scholarships to students participating in the Fund's political  activities (http://rotter.net/forum/scoops1/22416.shtml ).  This takes place at the Politics and Government course at Ben-Gurion University and counts as part of the students' program of studies. Does this collaboration with blatant political groups, including NGOs from the radical left, fall under the definition of "academic freedom of expression"?   Is there any connection between this collaboration and the fact that the person who heads this class happens to be calling for an academic boycott against Israel?  Is that what the heads of the academy intend when they publicize automatic support for any anti-Zionist masquerading as an academic?  Or perhaps they intend to demand that discussion itself be subject to censorship? The Legitimacy of De-Legitimization Another thing needs to be stated: Despite the fact that Shenhav is very close to the Arab Balad Party - "The National Democratic Assembly" [before the elections he hosted MK Hanin Zuabi at a parlor meeting in his home (http://www.tajamoa.org/?mod=article&ID=834)], despite the fact that the other two collaborators in the above "seminar" are radical left-wing activists, despite the fact that the above seminar is molded according to their extremist views, and despite the fact that what we have here is nothing less than political preaching – the seminar is legitimate. That is the meaning of academic freedom.  Teaching needs to provoke, anger and deviate from the consensus. Therefore there is no place for calling for the dismissal of those professors nor for an ultimatum to the university, demanding that it should mend its ways.  Threats of boycotts are ugly and unnecessary, whether emanating from the left or the right. But there is something else that is permitted: to publicize the existence of these courses, their contents, their motivations and political bias, and to publicize their use of brainwashing.  It is perfectly acceptable to reveal the fact that, for some reason, under the umbrella of "academic freedom" there is not a chance in hell of finding an academic seminar that refers its students to "practicum" or internships with, for any rightwing NGOs, like "Arteret Kohanim".  Nor will any students publish a joint booklet in conjunction with groups like that. It is also perfectly permissible to disclose that the vast majority of professors from the Political Science and Sociology Departments hold extremist anti-Zionist views.  Anyone who claims otherwise really wants leftist academics to be allowed to do whatever they wish without criticism. Yet at the same time anyone who so much as dares to think differently from the leftist Canon is not permitted to utter a word.  It is prohibited to criticize, expose or refute.  The reason for that is that the "sanctity of the academia" is reserved exclusively for the radical Left.  Every word of criticism is met with screams about "McCarthyism", "Fascism", and other "isms" from the bla bla of the academic First Amendment. In a forthcoming article, Prof. Amnon Rubenstein states that, according to the German Constitution, academic freedom of expression is a constitutional right as long as it does not (and that's an important condition) undermine the constitutional foundation of the country.  Thus, the restraint imposed upon the academia, within the context of their role in molding the minds of students, is even greater than that upon the rest of society.  This is not a suggestion that we adopt the German model, but food for thought for the purpose of public debate, so essential in this matter. Sociology in the Service of Demonization In recent years, much data have been accumulated dealing with the anti-Zionist tilt in university courses and in "academic conferences" (http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/529/615.html), conferences that often have nothing to do with academia and are sponsored by political groups. Here and there a few examples are publicized.   But they are only the tip of the iceberg. Dr, Hannan Moses conducted a research for the Institute for Zionist Strategy about the post-Zionist biases in the sociology departments (http://izs.org.il/documents/Post%20Zionism%20in%20the%20Academy-Draft.doc).  The findings were unequivocal. Their report illuminates the Israeli sociological maze of darkness. The IZS draft was sent to the Council for Higher Education and to close to 1,000 academics.  Not to protest.  Not to silence anyone.  Only for the purpose of presenting findings and to receive feedback in preparation for the report's final publication. Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles.  Prof. Joseph Klafter, President of Tel Aviv University, asked to have a look at the report and check its claims.  He asked to be shown the syllabi of certain courses.  That was the beginning of the deafening national "Gevalt" Campaign. How dare HE examine anything?  He is just a university president!  And once again, like in a Pavlovian reaction, the familiar chorus chants on: "Fascism!"  "McCarthyism!" The academic Thought Police adulates freedom, critique, defiance, and provocation – but all on one condition: that those things be the monopoly of the post-Zionists.  And the Thought Police achieved its purpose: There will be no investigation of courses at Tel Aviv University. Predictably, Haaretz newspaper is leading the campaign to silence the criticism of radical academics.  In an editorial under the title, "Politruks in Academia" (http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/politruks-in-academia-1.308486), the newspaper teamed up with the very same Yehoudah Shenhav, who of course was screeching "McCarthyism"!   The same Shenhav is attempting to turn the academy into a branch of "Balad" and leads the seminar in brainwashing sponsored by the series of left-wing organizations noted above. Interestingly enough, the only editorial in Israel that has explicitly preached against freedom of speech and against academic freedom appeared in that same Haaretz (http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/1059719.html).  It was when Israeli army colonel Pnina Baruch-Sharvit was supposed to give a course at the Tel Aviv University.  Baruch-Sharvit served in the military attorney's office and, as part of her job, she had to authorize certain military activities.  The enlightened newspaper decided to accuse her of "war crimes" and rashly hurried to convict and defame her in the court of leftist journalism on its editorial and news pages. Now this same champion of journalistic McCarthyism has the audacity to preach about academic freedom!  The impudence! A World Phenomenon A study in the United States (http://www.criticalreview.com/2004/pdfs/cardiff_klein.pdf ) reveals data indicating that political bias exists in every university.   In certain departments, the Republican:Democratic ratio was 1:5, 1:10 or 1:20 in favor of the Democrat professors (left-wing in Israeli terminology).  Except the difference between the US and Israel is immense.  The Democrats in the US consist of 50% of the population, while the post-Zionists are only a tiny fraction in Israeli society.  The problem isn't the dovish bias or even the left-wing politics of many Israeli professors. The problem lies in the fact that their common denominator is much more ambitious: Denial of Israel's right as a Jewish democratic state. Those who research crimes committed against the natives in North America or Australia do not rule out the right of Americans and Australians to exist, nor do they demand the "Right of Return" for millions of outsiders. This is not the case with Israel. Here we have political indoctrination that intentionally undermines the very existence of the state of Israel, at the same time masquerading as "academic freedom." Professors or Radical Left-Wing Activism? Dr. Moses's research points to Prof. Oren Yiftachel, one of the most prominent spokesmen for Post-Zionism and a role model for the others.   In "academic" articles, Yiftachel rejects the definition of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.  He has long labored at rearing a new generation of anti-Israel academics. Moses points out how Yiftachel's students mimic what they learn from their guru: "Indoctrination dominates these studies, including a consistent use of terminology and theories taken from the Post-Zionism 'School' and in particular from the teachings of Oren Yiftachel. "The repeated conclusions reached in these papers all proclaim in a single voice: The Jewish-Zionist collective created a non-democratic system (Israel) in order to expand at the expense of the Palestinian People . . .the Zionist-National ethos represents the basis of the discrimination, disinheritance and exclusion of the Palestinian (sic) residents of Israel. The precondition for transforming the State of Israel into an enlightened and democratic state is to cancel its Jewish nature and to cancel the Zionism of the state, and adopt a liberal-civilian, multi-cultured and post-national ethos." Ok, so if this were but one ideological approach among many presented to students, so be it.   But when all of Yiftachel's students are themselves a generic clone of himself – this is not about critical or academic discourse.  This is pure political propaganda. Many of Yiftachel's students are active in radical left-wing NGOs.  The fact of the matter is that there is no separation between their political activities and their "academic" activities.

The result is truly frightening:  A powerful campaign of indoctrination with one purpose: revoking the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their own country.

What they don't Teach

Prof. Ephraim Ya'ar, who is not suspected of any right-wing inclinations and who is in fact highly critical of the Right, stated in an article he published recently in Haaretz (https://secure.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/1176810.html ) that "academic freedom (in Israel) is being threatened by the radical Left." Ya'ar had no problem with what is taught in required classes.  His problem was with what is not taught.  He favors broad and critical dialogue.  But some of his colleagues, it turns out, prefer an indoctrination dialogue. The real problem is that materials from the 'School' of post-nationalism, post-colonization, or anti-Zionism are included in courses. The problem is that ONLY such anti-Israel materials are included, and there are very few dissenting alternatives in the study materials. Many of the graduates of the anti-Zionist courses are totally unaware that over 50 million people have experienced the difficult process of forced transfer and population exchange in order to create new states and nations (http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archives/009518.shtml ); or that the Jewish Nakba was worse than that of the Palestinians (http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archive/2009/05/ben-dror-yemini-the-jewish-nakba-expulsi/ ); or that the "Venice Committee" (http://amnonrubinstein.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=546&Itemid=101 ), founded by the European Union, recognizes the legitimacy of laws that were intended, in certain places, to give preferences for the sake of preserving the positions of an ethnic majority or national ethnic character (Benefit Laws); or that the right of self-determination of the nations includes the Jewish nation, just like the Slovakians, Armenians, or Palestinians. Academia does not have to serve as a mouthpiece for the Zionist vision.  And even when parts of the academy become tools in the hands of the anti-Zionists and the radical leftist NGOs – there is still no place for censorship or banning. Nevertheless it is necessary to expose, critique and demand open public discourse about this.  The problem is that there are those out there who wish to silence and suppress anyone who wishes to engage in such public discourse The Vicious Cycle Career advancement for many researchers is dependent upon publication in academic journals in the West, where some of those journals are explicitly anti-Zionist. An academic's chances are higher for publishing an anti-Zionist article.  They are in vogue.  The result of this is, as studies have shown, that post-Zionist academics tend to get far more exposure for their political writings. But there is a dangerous vicious cycle here.  Since promotion is dependent upon publication, the anti-Zionists benefit from an immense advantage. Anyone exposed to these "publications" knows that they boil down to a single article with endless generic mutations. Their writing is uniform.  As long as they use the tested codes and pet phrases - such as "ethnocracy," Zionist colonialism, oppression, narrative, Nakba, "ethnic cleansing," gaining control over territories, exclusion – their publication is assured.  They quote one another, justify one another, and radicalize one another, while creating a sticky hotbed of anti-Israel "orthodoxy."   This is the uniformity of thinking for our Bolshevik crowd. Prof. Shlomo Sand from Tel Aviv University published a book about the supposed fabricated invention of the Jewish People.  According to the writer, the Jews of today are descendants of Turkic communities that converted to Judaism and have no connection to the Jews of the past.  Hence Jews are at best religious tribes, not a nation.  Serious academics – there are still some out there and they are still the majority – refute most of the claims in the book. This did not interfere with the book becoming a best-seller (outside of Israel).

There is nothing like an Israeli academic in the service of the anti-Zionist assault: there is no Jewish People, therefore they have no right to a state. The success of the book, lapped up around the world by haters of Israel, makes it an intellectual terrorist attack.  No book refuting Sand's nonsense, no matter how excellently researched and written, will be met with similar success.

The reason for this is that something is rotten.  In academic life today, it is not only the quality of the publication that determines academic success. It is political orientation of the writer that is the ticket to success.

Orwell on the Silencing Orthodoxy

It must be stated clearly: the leading universities in Israel are not predominantly anti-Zionist.  The majority of the professors carry out their jobs fairly, and most of the professors with extremist views do not impose their opinions upon their students.  (Isracampus – we are not sure we agree with Yemini!) The study by the IZS mentioned above is limited to the sociology departments alone, and find them full of bias. The danger is not that someone exposed the bias in sociology departments, but in the kneejerk responses that prohibit such voicing of criticism. The disease may well spread. Academic freedom in Israel is indeed in danger, but not because someone dares to expose the prevalent and somewhat crazed anti-Zionist biases in certain departments and schools. George Orwell wrote: "Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness." That is exactly what is happening today in parts of the Israeli academia. There is no "critical discourse" in academic life, as the pampered academic mandarins like to claim, only an "Orthodox discourse," where that "orthodoxy" is leftist. There is no need for banning people, for soliciting the university donors to stop donating, and there is no place for dismissing professors because of their politics.  But for the sake of free academic expression, it is necessary to expose the ugly facts about parts of Israeli academia - for the sake preserving public discourse. Epilogue Before publication, I sent this blog item for comment to about 60 academics, almost all from the left although people who are not anti-Zionist.  From close to 30 who have responded so far, only two claimed that the article was way off the mark.  Many added intelligent comments and a few volunteered examples that reinforce the claims made. One professor, who teaches in the social-economics field and whose research is but nature critical, sent me the syllabus of the course he teaches. There he instructs his students to read articles that disagree with himself – and not just in token dosage. That is how it should be! Most of the comments I received were taken into consideration and they appear in the present version. The final responsibility for the article, needless to say, is mine alone. --- Ben  Dror Yemini Ynet har också en artikel om att sätta stopp för israeliska extremvänsterakademiker som talar för bojkott av Israel . ....
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share

Bloggen “al haMatzav” är högeligen irriterad över min åsiktsfrihet

Denna bloggartikeln, som stöder den israeliska vänsterns attacker mot den regering och riksdag som valts fram, har också åsiktsfrihet förstås. Den tycks vara lika disorienterad om pressfrihet och åsiktsfrihet som Bildt var när Aftonbladet som KULTUR, inte nyheter, publicerade en medeltida rövarhistoria om att Israel skulle stjäla organ från mer eller mindre levande palestinaaraber. Boström sa själv ungefär att "kanske det inte är sant men se hur bra jag har plockat ihop detaljer som indikerar att Israel är värt att hata", och blev inbjuden som hedersgäst till både Iran och arabländer. Många anklagade artikeln för att skriva om antisemitism - tillåtet att skriva om förstås, men Bildt ansåg att det var förbjudet att uttrycka åsikten att det var antisemitism. Också EU-medlemmar uppmanade honom, och Sverige hade ordförandeskapet då, men han totalvägrade. Sverige och Israel har liknande lagar för pressfrihet och åsiktsfrihet - UNDER ANSVAR, med skillnaden att Israel är i  krig med nästan alla grannar - på grund av grannarna. De är också i [media]krig med en stor del av befolkningen i de länder där ledningen har en mer eller mindre kall fred med Israel, men låter deras statliga media fortsätta med israelhat. Israel är i mediakrig med nästan hela vänstern och de flesta muslimer som har slagit sig ner i Västvärlden. Jag gav länken till där Peace Now anklagas för spioneri. Inte mitt påhitt, även om det irriterar vissa. Där står bl.a. att Peace Now fick €50.000 från Finland för spioneri på judar i Judéen/Samarien, $100.000 från sympatetisörer i USA och €150.000 från Europeiska grupper. Dessa pengar för att flygspana efter judar, bättre än Hitler någonsin lyckades med. Detta är straffbart i Israel:
The Israel Penal Code for Espionage was distributed to Knesset Interior Committees. Clause 3 of that code defines "photography of sensitive areas of Israel for any foreign power" as an act of espionage, punishable by ten years imprisonment if convicted.
Denna flygfotografering är alltså definierad som spioneri. De fotograferar också militära installationer som lämnas ut till deras donatorer. Chefen för Peace Now har en enorm lön efter Israeliska mått mätt. Högern vann valet i Israel. Vänstern - som tilltalar många tidningar i Israel och de flesta i Sverige, förkväver fortfarande information från högersidan. Sök i Eniros nyhetsförmedling efter dessa extremvänstergrupper som kallar sig "människorättsgrupper", så länge man inte räknar nationalistiska judar som människor: B'tselem 48 träffar Peace Now 113 och Fred Nu 29 Gush Shalom 28 Tillsammans 218 om jag har räknat rätt Och den högergrupp som hörts mest på sistone, Im Tirzu har NOLL träffar. Nämner man alltså något om att där faktiskt finns högergrupper och deras åsikter i Israel, hojtar al haMatzav högeligen över orättvisan, som om jag hade gjort något fult. Fler länkar om Im Tirzu: JPost länk2 JPost länk4 Im Tirzu började bli mer känd när de avslöjade hur Meretz-stödda NGO:s (Meretz är ett närmast marxistiskt parti i Israel som lyckades ta åt sej 2.95% av röstarna vid senaste valet - en del al haMatzav-medarbetare är kända Meretz-sympatetisörer.) Jag kopierar in en artikel härifrån:

The Israeli Free Speech Movement (at last!!)

(In photo, Ronen Shoval) I grow up in the 60s when Mario Savio, head of the Berkeley Free Speech movement, was my hero. The Mario Savio of Israel today is Ronen Shoval, head of the Im Tirtzu Zionist student organization, and his many comrades. Im Tirtzu has become the dominant voice on Israeli campuses, even – and indeed notably – on Ben Gurion University, with its scores of rabidly anti-Zionist leftist faculty members. While Shoval and his team have had enormous successes to date, even I was astounded at the incredible coup they engineered this morning. Im Tirtzu has issued a set of demands (remind anyone of Berkeley in the 60s?) insisting that Ben Gurion University do something to restrain and balance the anti-Israel bias in its politics department and in other departments, or else Im Tirtzu will call upon donors to the university to withhold funds or put them into escrow until BGU really does something about the anti-Israel indoctrination there. The Israeli mainstream media is hysterical and having a field day. Haaretz runs the story as its top banner headline on its front page. Every other Israeli newspaper today (I have not seen Maariv yet but suspect it makes a full house with this) runs the story. Every radio station in Israel carried reports and debates about the Im Tirtzu move and no doubt the evening news shows on TV will also carry reports. The far Left is hysterical. BGU’s David Newman is all over the place trying ti discredit the report. He claims that BGU leftists cannot be seen as anti-Zionist because a lot of them (like him) made aliya themselves and that proves they are Zionist. This is a bit like claiming that because that Moslem who shot up Fort Hood in Texas had joined the US army, he must be a patriot and pro-American. Yossi Ben Artzi, the leftist Rector of the University of Haifa, is leading the pack of leftist academics denouncing Im Tirtzu (he was a founder of Peace Now). Ben-Artzi’s politics will be clear to you from this: he has always refused to shut down the anti-Semitic ALEF list (see this) but ordered me to his office to tell me that use of sarcasm on a Haifa professors list to mock the anti-Israel political activism of Haifa leftist faculty members is prohibited. At the bottom of this posting, I attach a typical example of ALEF Neo-Nazism.
I think the newspaper reports speak for themselves, and attach or excerpt them below, Excerpt from Haaretz story: The high proportion of "anti-Zionist" faculty in the department compared to the prevalence of such views in the general population "arouses grave suspicions that the main basis for acceptance into and promotion within the department is not professional, but political," the (Im Tirtzu) letter continued. It also accused Carmi of "apathy that has enabled an academic dictatorship to overpower academic freedom." "Out of honest concern for the student body's academic freedom and fear for the university's future, we urge you to put an end to the department's severe anti-Zionist tilt and its ban on Zionist students and researchers," the letter continued.
Im Tirtzu threatens boycott of Israeli university over 'anti-Zionist' bias Rightist group targets political science faculty at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. By Or Kashti If Ben-Gurion University of the Negev doesn't take steps "to put an end to the anti-Zionist tilt" in its politics and government department, Im Tirtzu will work to persuade donors in Israel and abroad to stop funding the university, the organization threatened in a letter to university president Prof. Rivka Carmi last month. The group said it would ask donors to put contributions in escrow until "this tilt in the makeup of the department's faculty and the content of its syllabi has been corrected." It also said it would "advise political science students to stay away from the university." Finally, it gave Carmi one month to accede to its demands - which will be up tomorrow. Until now, the university has not responded. But on Monday, the heads of all the country's universities issued a joint response. "No Israeli university has to prove its staff's love of their homeland to any organization, and certainly not to a political one that is trying to present a tendentious, manipulative document as 'research' to advance its own public relations," the statement said. "As is proper in an enlightened democratic country, Israeli academia is not a political body, and academic faculty are chosen solely according to objective criteria of excellence in research and teaching." The "document" in question, a report Im Tirtzu published several months ago on post-Zionism in the political science departments of Israeli universities in general, met with a tepid response from the universities. But the unprecedented direct attack on Ben-Gurion made them realize that any of them could be next - hence Monday's strong statement. Prof. David Newman - the newly appointed dean of Ben-Gurion's Faculty of the Humanities and Social Sciences, who has been a tireless campaigner against efforts to impose an academic boycott on Israel - termed the letter "a clear attempt to threaten the university in an era of diminishing financial resources." Im Tirtzu's accusations against the department, he added, are "very far from the truth." Though its earlier report's methodology was widely criticized, Im Tirtzu chairman Ronen Shoval and spokesman Erez Tadmor cited it in their July 18 letter to Carmi as the basis for their demands, saying it showed that the department's faculty "works deliberately and energetically to promote fiercely anti-Zionist messages." They charged that nine of its 11 permanent faculty members were involved in "radical left-wing" political activity, and six had signed a letter supporting refusal to serve in the army; two of its research fellows "are known among the students for their anti-Zionist worldview"; and eight of its 19 adjunct faculty "express radical leftist views." As an example, they cited department chairman Prof. Neve Gordon, who has called for a "social, economic and political boycott of Israel." They also said the department's course syllabi were heavily tilted toward "anti-national and anti-Zionist content." The high proportion of "anti-Zionist" faculty in the department compared to the prevalence of such views in the general population "arouses grave suspicions that the main basis for acceptance into and promotion within the department is not professional, but political," the letter continued. It also accused Carmi of "apathy that has enabled an academic dictatorship to overpower academic freedom." "Out of honest concern for the student body's academic freedom and fear for the university's future, we urge you to put an end to the department's severe anti-Zionist tilt and its ban on Zionist students and researchers," the letter continued. In other words, Im Tirtzu itself asked the university to introduce political considerations into the choice of its faculty. It then asked Carmi to detail the "practical steps" she intends to take to comply with its demands within a month. If she refuses, "we will use all legal means at our disposal to inform present and future students, and especially supporters of the university both in Israel and abroad," the letter concluded. Tadmor charged on Monday that the department has ceased to be a center of "academic excellence" and instead become "a hotbed of anti-Israel propaganda." "The public expects university heads to stop rolling their eyes and provide clear answers as to why this department, and other departments at other universities, have become centers of anti-Israel propaganda and incitement and how they intend to deal with the matter," he added. Asked how Im Tirtzu plans to carry out its threats, he said the issue has been already broached with some Ben-Gurion donors - "not just one or two" - and "this is only the beginning." But he said the group does not plan to send similar letters to other universities. It chose to begin with Ben-Gurion, he said, because "to the best of our knowledge, the problem is worst there." Officially, Ben-Gurion has decided not to respond to the letter. But one university source termed the demands "scandalous," a violation of "everything that is sacred to academia. The very act of responding to the letter would give this right-wing organization legitimacy." Another university official said that most of the department's staff had immigrated from the West, and "there is no more Zionist act than that. The department also teaches air force cadets, who would not come if anyone thought we were preaching anti-Zionism here. It's ridiculous to start proving that we're Zionists." (the talkbacks on page are worth reading; Here is the Haaretz official Editorial about this – denouncing critics of the Left as “Politruks”. This coming from the anti-Zionist far-leftist newspaper whose degree of pluralism resembles that of Pravda back in the days of Brezhnev: Meanwhile, Israel’s radical leftists are soiling their nappies over the success of NGO Monitor in persuading the Knesset to advance a bill that would force anti-Israel NGOs (non-government organizations) to reveal the sources of their funding. See this. Naturally Haaretz considers this also “McCarthyist.” The Left is afraid that the Israeli public will learn about the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sources funding such groups operating in Israel. Here is the Jerusalem Post’s Story: Im Tirzu threatens BGU donations By JPOST.COM STAFF 08/17/2010 10:17 Zionist organization demands university change "left-wing" faculty. In a letter written to Ben-Gurion University head Prof. Rivka Carmi last month, Zionist organization Im Tirzu threatened to take action to stop contributions to the school if Carmi didn't work to end the "anti-Zionist tendencies" in the university's Politics and Government Department. The letter gave Carmi a thirty day ultimatum, which ended on Tuesday, to make changes to the faculty before Im Tirzu would begin persuading donors to cease contributing financially to the university. Im Tirzu requested in the letter that the faculty add more right-wing professors to its staff and change the contents of its syllabi accordingly. The organization also said it would "advise political science students to stay away from the university. The letter claimed that nine of the department's eleven permanent members were involved in "radical left-wing" political activity. Carmi was accused of "apathy that has enabled an academic dictatorship to overpower academic freedom." Carmi denied that Ben-Gurion University had any political agenda and said that Im Tirzu's threats were reminiscent of "McCarthyist persecution," in a Tuesday interview with Army Radio. See also RELATED:Fighting anti-Zionism on Israeli campuses 'now more vital than ever' NIF: Im Tirtzu report consists of ‘lies, manipulations' Here is the Yediot report on the same story. The Hebrew Haaretz report is here and contains hundreds of talkbacks, almost all of them supporting Im Tirtzu!! Neo-Nazism on the University of Haifa ALEF list: Tony Greenstein (tonygreenstein@yahoo.com), British Communist and Anti-Semite, posted this "report" on his trip to Auschwitz on ALEF on 16 August 2010 To: Alef Date: Monday August 16, 2010 (excerpt) It was in short an error-strewn explanation acceptable to all who have a vested interest in Auschwitz as the justification for Israel's oppression today. Poland, being a good friend of Israel, conducts the tours accordingly. Instead of the solemnity of Sachsenhausen there is the tourist fanfare of Auschwitz. In short Auschwitz-Birkenau is a money spinner for the Polish state and in return loads of Israeli Jewish high-school students visit in order to learn one of the foundational lessons of why Israel came into being. Auschwitz, whose bombing the Zionists failed to campaign around at the time (Ben-Gurion opposing idea altogether) and to whom nearly half a million Hungarian Jews were deported in the spring of 1944 after the Zionists had done a deal to save the elite of Hungarian Jewry, is now used to justify further racism and murder, whilst the remaining survivors of the holocaust live in poverty in Israel and America as Zionist organisations have siphoned off the funds. It goes without saying that to see the heap of prosthetic limbs and the mounds of clothing, to say nothing of the victims, especially the child victims of Auschwitz, is heart-rending. It is unfortunate that Auschwitz, the symbol of fascist barbarity, the deliberate and industrial extermination of millions of people, has been harnessed to justify the cruelties of Zionism. Just as the goal of Nazism was to make Germany Jew-free, so today Zionism's goal is the Judification of the Negev and Galilee. Perhaps this brought out best when I asked, in both the Auschwitz and the Birkenau bookshops whether there was anything written by Rudolph Vrba, who together with Alfred Wetzler, were the second and third Jewish escapees who had broken out of Auschwitz on April 9th 1944 and reached Slovakia 15 days later. Their Auschwitz Protocols described the camp and its purpose in detail yet in Hungary itself the Zionist leadership sat on it. When eventually they were publicised thanks to Swiss newspapers and then a BBC broadcast, the deportations halted and and estimated 200,000 Hungarian Jews were saved. Maybe I had expected something more from the visit, possibly the quiet horror which is all that remains of Sachsenhausen, instead Auschwitz has become a tourist destination. Tony Greenstein This Hatred is Disseminated via the University of Haifa Ephraim Nimni claims Ahmadinejad is not an anti-Semite on ALEF on 12 May 2009 Re: Standing up against antisemitism, " (Ephraim Nimni) Are these the deeds of an Anti-Semite? Brian Klug is wrong, and this is not to say that Ahmadinejad is right. Ahmadinejad is a religious fundamentalist like the friend he is kissing. I dislike Ahmadinejad's world view as much as I dislike the world view of his mate in the photo. Their views are Manichean, like the views of all fundamentalists: there is one source of absolute truth and one source of absolute evil. I personally find this Manichean dichotomy absurd, and moreover, there is a great dose of conspiratorial third worldism in Ahmadinejad arguments and a manifest inability to understand the West and its sensitivities. All of this undermines his political campaign But to accuse Ahmadinejad of anti-Semitism is to fall into the inverted mirror image of Ahmadinejad third worldism, a deep Eurocentrism that only knows to judge the world in terms of European categories and remains blissfully ignorant of non European circumstances, logics or categories of thought. In this regard, Brian Klug appears to exhibit the Orientalist thinking so eloquently denounced by Edward Said. Apart from ignoring that the largest Jewish community in the Middle East outside Israel lives voluntarily under Ahmadinejad's sovereignty, Klug appears to ignore that Ahmadinejad's extreme language is addressed to Israel and not to Jews. His Holocaust conference was an act of crass ignorance, not anti-Semitism. He falls neatly into the category that Joseph Massad calls Zionist Muslims, and he is an embarrassment to those who support the Palestinian cause. These "Zionist Muslims" deny the Holocaust because they subscribe to the Zionist logic that the Holocaust is the justification for Israel, so they believe that if they deny the Holocaust they will be denying Israel. This is a statement of crass ignorant Third Worldism (sic) but not of (western) Anti-Semitism. Instead of fighting Zionism, Ahmadinejad and his mates end up justifying a Zionist claim. And Brian Klug, in spite of his early perceptive differentiations between criticisms of Israel and anti-Semitism, joins the ranks of the Orientalists and those who use accusations of anti-Semitism to deflect criticisms of Israel. Ephraim This Hatred is Disseminated via the University of Haifa
Andra artiklar med liknande innehåll på t.ex.
Hur mycket har du läst om detta i Sverige - utanför denna blogg som utnyttjar rätten att uttrycka sig? Yttrandefrihet i all ära, men när alla yttranden censureras - jag har sänt oändliga israelpositiva artiklar till svenska tidningar och t.ex. SvDs Brännpunkt (en tidning som i yttrandefrihetens namn bojkottar denna blogg) har aldrig någonsin tagit in något jag sänt dom! De har "aldrig plats"........
Det är min åsikt.
.
. ...
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Share